Coplanar film electrodes facilitate bovine nuclear transfer cloning

Automated lab on chip systems offer increased throughput and reproducibility, but the implementation of microelectrodes presently relies on miniaturisation of parallel plate electrodes that are time consuming and costly to fabricate. Electric field modelling of open electrofusion chambers suggested that widely spaced (≥2 mm) coplanar film electrodes should result in similar cell fusion rates as parallel plate electrodes provided the cell positioning was roughly midway between the electrodes. This hypothesis was investigated by electrofusion trials of bovine oocyte-donor cell couplets used in nuclear transfer (NT) cloning. Comparative experiments with reference parallel plate electrodes were conducted as controls. Coplanar fusion rates ≥ 90% were demonstrated for embryonic blastomeres, follicular cells and fetal and adult fibroblasts as NT donor cells. For embryonic and adult cell types, there was no significant difference in fusion rate between coplanar and parallel plate electrodes. For both electrode geometries, fusion efficiency with adult fibroblasts was highest at a calculated field strength of 2.33 kV/cm. The coplanar electrodes required a voltage π/2 times greater than parallel plate electrodes to achieve equivalent field strength when the couplets are placed midway between the electrodes.

[1]  I Wilmut,et al.  Improved development to blastocyst of ovine nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed during the presumptive S-phase of enucleated activated oocytes. , 1994, Biology of reproduction.

[2]  Ulrich Zimmermann,et al.  A traveling‐wave micropump for aqueous solutions: Comparison of 1 g and μg results , 1993 .

[3]  R. A. Sjodin,et al.  Determination of electric field threshold for electrofusion of erythrocyte ghosts. Comparison of pulse-first and contact-first protocols. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[4]  S. Masuda,et al.  Handling biological cells using a fluid integrated circuit , 1990 .

[5]  H. R. Tervit,et al.  Production of cloned calves following nuclear transfer with cultured adult mural granulosa cells. , 1999, Biology of reproduction.

[6]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Electric Field‐induced Fusion of Sea Urchin Eggs , 1981, Development, growth & differentiation.

[7]  Yi-Kuen Lee,et al.  Using a micro electroporation chip to determine the optimal physical parameters in the uptake of biomolecules in HeLa cells. , 2007, Bioelectrochemistry.

[8]  D. J. Brenner,et al.  Exact confidence limits for binomial proportions―Pearson and Hartley revisited , 1990 .

[9]  S. M. Seidel,et al.  Manual of the International Embryo Transfer Society , 1998 .

[10]  D. Wells,et al.  Cloning cattle: the methods in the madness. , 2007, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[11]  Micro pulsed radio-frequency electroporation chips. , 2006, Bioelectrochemistry.

[12]  D. Marcuse.  Electrostatic field of coplanar lines computed with the point matching method , 1989 .

[13]  Urban Seger,et al.  Cell immersion and cell dipping in microfluidic devices. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[14]  Guillaume Tresset,et al.  A Microfluidic Device for Electrofusion of Biological Vesicles , 2004, 17th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. Maastricht MEMS 2004 Technical Digest.

[15]  I. Wilmut,et al.  Human cloning: can it be made safe? , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  I. Wilmut,et al.  Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line , 1996, Nature.

[17]  T. Reese,et al.  Changes in membrane structure induced by electroporation as revealed by rapid-freezing electron microscopy. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Michael P. Eichenlaub,et al.  Aggregating Embryonic but Not Somatic Nuclear Transfer Embryos Increases Cloning Efficiency in Cattle1 , 2007, Biology of reproduction.

[19]  H Morgan,et al.  Analytical electric field and sensitivity analysis for two microfluidic impedance cytometer designs. , 2007, IET nanobiotechnology.

[20]  Ulrich Zimmermann,et al.  Electromanipulation of cells , 1996 .

[21]  Y. Chung,et al.  Embryonic stem cells using nuclear transfer. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[22]  I. Wilmut,et al.  "Viable Offspring Derived from Fetal and Adult Mammalian Cells" (1997), by Ian Wilmut et al. , 2014 .

[23]  S. D. de Laat,et al.  Nuclear transfer and electrofusion in bovine in vitro‐matured/in vitro‐fertilized embryos: Effect of media and electrical fusion parameters , 1993, Molecular reproduction and development.

[24]  Electric field analysis using Schwarz-Christoffel mapping , 2008 .

[25]  T. Tani,et al.  Direct Exposure of Chromosomes to Nonactivated Ovum Cytoplasm Is Effective for Bovine Somatic Cell Nucleus Reprogramming1 , 2001, Biology of reproduction.

[26]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  High throughput particle analysis: combining dielectrophoretic particle focussing with confocal optical detection. , 2006, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[27]  Analysis of the effects of an orifice plate on the membrane potential in electroporation and electrofusion of cells , 2007 .

[28]  H. R. Tervit,et al.  Cloned cattle derived from a novel zona-free embryo reconstruction system. , 2003, Cloning and stem cells.

[29]  P. Gaynor,et al.  Couplet alignment and improved electrofusion by dielectrophoresis for a zona-free high-throughput cloned embryo production system , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.