Optimum active twist input scenario for performance improvement and vibration reduction of a helicopter rotor

Abstract In this paper, the best actuation scenario is sought using a multitude of active twist control inputs taking advantage of a global search algorithm to improve performance and reduce vibration of a helicopter rotor. The active twist schemes include a single harmonic, multiple harmonic, and three different segmented non-harmonic actuation cases. An advanced particle swarm assisted genetic algorithm (PSGA) is employed for the optimizer. In addition, a comprehensive rotorcraft analysis code CAMRAD II is used to reach the trim and to predict the rotor power and hub vibratory loads. A scale-down BO-105 model is used for the reference rotor while assuming the actuator material embedded in the blade structure. Among the active twist control inputs, the non-harmonic cases show the best performance gains in reducing the hub vibrations and power consumptions. The hub vibration is reduced by up to 87% while the rotor power required is decreased by 3.3% as compared to the baseline uncontrolled rotor in low speed descending flight condition when using the non-harmonic active twist schedules. The resulting optimized actuation profiles are found for each of the active twist control cases and the physical mechanism leading to less vibration and power consumption is discussed. The Pareto optimum is also examined to illustrate the simultaneous reduction in the power required and the hub vibration of the rotor.

[1]  Matthew L. Wilbur,et al.  FURTHER EXAMINATION OF THE VIBRATORY LOADS REDUCTION RESULTS FROM THE NASA/ARMY/MIT ACTIVE TWIST ROTOR TEST , 2002 .

[2]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics—Computational Structural Dynamics Analysis of Active Control of Helicopter Rotor for Performance Improvement , 2010 .

[3]  Do-Hyung Kim,et al.  Comprehensive Code Validation on Airloads and Aeroelastic Responses of the HART II Rotor , 2010 .

[4]  Matthew L. Wilbur,et al.  The Effect of Non-Harmonic Active Twist Actuation on BVI Noise , 2011 .

[5]  Hyeonsoo Yeo,et al.  Assessment of Active Controls for Rotor Performance Enhancement , 2008 .

[6]  I. Chopra,et al.  Induced strain actuation of composite beams and rotor blades with embedded piezoceramic elements , 1996 .

[7]  Sung Nam Jung,et al.  Advanced particle swarm assisted genetic algorithm for constrained optimization problems , 2014, Computational Optimization and Applications.

[8]  W. Johnson,et al.  CAMRAD - A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYTICAL MODEL OF ROTORCRAFT AERODYNAMICS AND DYNAMICS , 1994 .

[9]  Sung Nam Jung,et al.  Loose Fluid-Structure Coupled Approach for a Rotor in Descent Incorporating Fuselage Effects , 2013 .

[10]  Hyeonsoo Yeo,et al.  Investigation of Rotor Performance and Loads of a UH-60A Individual Blade Control System , 2010 .

[11]  van der Wall,et al.  2nd HHC Aeroacoustic Rotor Test (HART II) - Part I: Test Documentation - , 2003 .

[12]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Status of Application of Smart Structures Technology to Rotorcraft Systems , 2000 .

[13]  Brandon P. Hagerty,et al.  Study on Blade Property Measurement and Its Influence on Air/Structural Loads , 2015 .

[14]  Prashant M. Pawar,et al.  Single-crystal-material-based induced-shear actuation for vibration reduction of helicopters with composite rotor system , 2008 .

[15]  Matthew L. Wilbur,et al.  A Computational Study of BVI Noise Reduction Using Active Twist Control , 2010 .