An inference method of team situation awareness based on mutual awareness

Team situation awareness (TSA) is a critical contributing factor in establishing collaborative relations among team members involved in cooperative activity. Currently, however, there is still a lack of a clearly understandable and commonly agreeable model of TSA. To resolve misunderstanding or conflict among team members or between a team and machines, our research aim is to find out the underlying mechanism of TSA that reflects team cognitive process in a way consistent with team cooperative activity, and to focus on how to achieve mutual understanding, and how to effectively incorporate human teams into a socio-technological system. In this paper, we argue that earlier models of TSA, where TSA was discussed as the intersection of situation awareness (SA) owned by individual team members, are inadequate for study of a sophisticated team reciprocal process. We suggest that it is necessary for the definition of TSA to integrate the notion of individual SA (ISA) into cooperative team activity. In particular, understanding of mutual awareness is an essential element in cooperative activity. We propose a new notion of TSA, which is reducible to mutual beliefs as well as ISA at three levels. Further, we develop an operational TSA inference method and discuss human competence and system-related factors that are required to build TSA. We then try to demonstrate how TSA is actively constructed via inferencing practices. We also develop criteria to assess appropriateness of TSA from two aspects: soundness and completeness of mutual beliefs. Comparison of evaluation results indicates that the notion of TSA proposed in this work is more suitable to depict team cooperative activity than conventional ones.

[1]  Carolyn Prince,et al.  An Overview of Team Performance Measurement , 1997 .

[2]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  On Acting Together , 1990, AAAI.

[3]  Endsley,et al.  A model of inter- and intrateam situation awareness: implications for design, training and measurement , 2001 .

[4]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Series in Applied Psychology. , 1997 .

[5]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  THE ROLE OF SITUATION ASSESSMENT IN THE CONDUCT OF FLIGHT AND IN DECISION MAKING. , 1997 .

[6]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Situation Awareness in Team Performance: Implications for Measurement and Training , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[7]  George M. Siouris,et al.  SAMPLE: SITUATION AWARENESS MODEL FOR PILOT IN-THE-LOOP EVALUATION , 1995 .

[8]  H. Artman,et al.  Situation Awareness as Distributed Cognition , 2004 .

[9]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[10]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  The Ecology of Human-Machine Systems II: Mediating 'Direct Perception' in Complex Work Domains , 1990 .

[11]  B. Hartman,et al.  Situational awareness is more than exceptional vision. , 1991, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[12]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[13]  Kazuo Furuta,et al.  Behavioral simulation of a nuclear power plant operator crew for human–machine system design , 1999 .

[14]  Karol G. Ross,et al.  The Recognition-Primed Decision Model , 2004 .

[15]  Hartman Bo,et al.  Situational awareness is more than exceptional vision. , 1991 .

[16]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Shared Cooperative Activity , 1991 .

[17]  C. Sidner,et al.  Plans for Discourse , 1988 .

[18]  J.M. O'Hara,et al.  Advanced control rooms and crew performance issues: implications for human reliability , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[19]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Situation Awareness and the Cognitive Management of Complex Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Effects of awareness support on groupware usability , 1998, CHI.

[22]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.