Differences in Fitts' Law Task Performance Based on Environment Scaling

Haptics research has begun implementing haptic feedback in tasks of great precision and skill, such as robotic surgery. Haptic displays can represent task environments with arbitrary scaling. Fitts' Law suggests differences in the scale of a workspace rendered on a visual display and in a haptic display should not affect performance of those tasks. However, interactions of great precision and skill may require understanding and verifying the influence of perceiving an environment when the visual and haptic displays represent those environments with differing scales. This experiment measured the influence that mismatched haptic and visual display scalings had on movement times in. Each of five treatments used different scales in the visual and the haptic displays. A Friedman rank test showed a significant difference across all treatments. A post hocpairwise comparison showed a nearly significant difference between two treatments. These findings suggest the need for further study using more participants and parametric statistics to measure the magnitude of the possible influences.

[1]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  How low can you go? Detection thresholds for small haptic effects. , 2001 .

[2]  L. A. Marascuilo,et al.  Nonparametric and Distribution-Free Methods for the Social Sciences , 1977 .

[3]  G. S. Lee Low Power Haptic Devices: Ramifications on Perception and Device Design , 2004 .

[4]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Doc at a Distance , 2006, IEEE Spectrum.

[5]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Preliminary two dimensional haptic thresholds and task performance enhancements , 2003, 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2003. HAPTICS 2003. Proceedings..

[7]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Haptic Feedback in a Telepresence System for Endoscopic Heart Surgery , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[8]  Richard M. Satava,et al.  HOW THE FUTURE OF SURGERY IS CHANGING: ROBOTICS, TELESURGERY, SURGICAL SIMULATORS AND OTHER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES: , 2009 .

[9]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  H. Abdi The Bonferonni and Šidák Corrections for Multiple Comparisons , 2006 .

[11]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Haptic feedback of kinematic conditioning for telerobotic applications , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).