Highlighting interventions and user differences: informing adaptive information visualization support

There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of information visualization techniques can be impacted by the particular needs and abilities of each user. This suggests that it is important to investigate information visualization systems that can dynamically adapt to each user. In this paper, we address the question of how to adapt. In particular, we present a study to evaluate a variety of visual prompts, called "interventions", that can be performed on a visualization to help users process it. Our results show that some of the tested interventions perform better than a condition in which no intervention is provided, both in terms of task performance as well as subjective user ratings. We also discuss findings on how intervention effectiveness is influenced by individual differences and task complexity.

[1]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[2]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization , 2005, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005..

[3]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[4]  Graham J Hole,et al.  How to Design and Report Experiments , 2002 .

[5]  Vibhu O. Mittal Visual Prompts and Graphical Design: A Framework for Exploring the Design Space of 2-D Charts and Graphs , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[6]  Cristina Conati,et al.  User-adaptive information visualization: using eye gaze data to infer visualization tasks and user cognitive abilities , 2013, IUI '13.

[7]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Exploring the role of individual differences in information visualization , 2008, AVI '08.

[8]  Hanspeter Pfister,et al.  LineUp: Visual Analysis of Multi-Attribute Rankings , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  Cristina Conati,et al.  When to Adapt: Detecting User's Confusion During Visualization Processing , 2013, UMAP Workshops.

[10]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-learning , 2008 .

[11]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  A. Jameson Adaptive interfaces and agents , 2002 .

[13]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[14]  Zhen Wen,et al.  Behavior-driven visualization recommendation , 2009, IUI.

[15]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures , 2011, CHI.

[16]  Cynthia A. Brewer,et al.  ColorBrewer.org: An Online Tool for Selecting Colour Schemes for Maps , 2003 .

[17]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  A Tour through the Visualization Zoo , 2010 .

[18]  Thomas W. Calvert,et al.  Moticons: : detection, distraction and task , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Marilyn Tremaine,et al.  Understanding visualization through spatial ability differences , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[20]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Powerful and consistent analysis of likert-type rating scales , 2010, CHI.

[21]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Individual user characteristics and information visualization: connecting the dots through eye tracking , 2013, CHI.

[22]  Giuseppe Carenini,et al.  ValueCharts: analyzing linear models expressing preferences and evaluations , 2004, AVI.

[23]  Beate Grawemeyer,et al.  Evaluation of ERST - An External Representation Selection Tutor , 2006, Diagrams.

[24]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[25]  Ingrid Zukerman,et al.  The automated understanding of simple bar charts , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[26]  T. Zandt,et al.  How to fit a response time distribution , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  William Ribarsky,et al.  How locus of control influences compatibility with visualization style , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[28]  Giuseppe Carenini,et al.  A multimedia interface for facilitating comparisons of opinions , 2009, IUI.

[29]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  A tour through the visualization zoo , 2010, ACM Queue.

[30]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[31]  Brian D. Fisher,et al.  Towards the Personal Equation of Interaction: The impact of personality factors on visual analytics interface interaction , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[32]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[33]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Elements of graph design , 1993 .

[34]  E. Vogel,et al.  Human Variation in Overriding Attentional Capture , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Maneesh Agrawala,et al.  Graphical Overlays: Using Layered Elements to Aid Chart Reading , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[36]  David R. Flatla,et al.  SSMRecolor: improving recoloring tools with situation-specific models of color differentiation , 2012, CHI.

[37]  Cristina Conati,et al.  An Analysis of Attention to Student - Adaptive Hints in an Educational Game , 2012, ITS.

[38]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Towards adaptive information visualization: on the influence of user characteristics , 2012, UMAP.