Active learning and active subspace enhancement for PDEM-based high-dimensional reliability analysis

Abstract An efficient reliability method, termed as the AL-AS-GPR-PDEM, is proposed in this study, which effectively combines the probability density evolution method (PDEM) and the Gaussian process regression (GPR) surrogate model enhanced by both the active subspace (AS)-based dimension reduction and the active learning (AL)-based sampling strategy. In this method, the AS-GPR model is developed, where the AS and the GPR are jointly calibrated so as to bypass the tricky prerequisite of gradient information to discover the latent AS of the original parameter space; then, the AL-based sampling strategy is employed to construct a satisfactorily accurate AS-GPR model using as fewer training samples as possible. This treatment allows that the newly-added training sample at each iteration can be simultaneously used to both update the discovered low-dimensional AS and refine the constructed GPR model within the AS. Lastly, the finalized AS-GPR model is employed to predict the equivalent extreme values (EEVs) of structural responses at the representative point set, thereby the PDEM-based reliability analysis can be readily performed based on the estimated EEVs. To testify the effectiveness of the proposed method, four numerical examples are addressed, involving both surrogate modelling of analytical functions with different characteristics and dynamic reliability analysis of linear/nonlinear engineering structures under seismic excitations. It is demonstrated that the proposed method is of satisfactory accuracy and efficiency for structural reliability analysis in high dimensions.

[1]  Chao Hu,et al.  A comparative study of probability estimation methods for reliability analysis , 2012 .

[2]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[3]  S. H. Crandall First-crossing probabilities of the linear oscillator , 1970 .

[4]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[5]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[6]  Wotao Yin,et al.  A feasible method for optimization with orthogonality constraints , 2013, Math. Program..

[7]  Jianbing Chen,et al.  Stochastic Dynamics of Structures , 2009 .

[8]  Ilias Bilionis,et al.  Gaussian processes with built-in dimensionality reduction: Applications in high-dimensional uncertainty propagation , 2016, 1602.04550.

[9]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  The Curse of Dimensionality in Data Mining and Time Series Prediction , 2005, IWANN.

[10]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[11]  Ralph C. Smith,et al.  Gradient-Free Construction of Active Subspaces for Dimension Reduction in Complex Models with Applications to Neutronics , 2019, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification.

[12]  Hong-Shuang Li,et al.  Matlab codes of Subset Simulation for reliability analysis and structural optimization , 2016, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[13]  Qiqi Wang,et al.  Erratum: Active Subspace Methods in Theory and Practice: Applications to Kriging Surfaces , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[14]  Dario De Domenico,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization of adaptive sliding base isolation system for improving seismic performance of structures , 2021, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Hongping Zhu,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by AK–SS: An active learning method combining Kriging and Subset Simulation , 2016 .

[16]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[17]  Yan Shi,et al.  A reliability analysis method based on analytical expressions of the first four moments of the surrogate model of the performance function , 2018, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[18]  Yongbo Peng,et al.  Nonlinear Response of Structures Subjected to Stochastic Excitations via Probability Density Evolution Method , 2014 .

[19]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  Moment methods for structural reliability , 2001 .

[20]  Masao Fukushima,et al.  On the Global Convergence of the BFGS Method for Nonconvex Unconstrained Optimization Problems , 2000, SIAM J. Optim..

[21]  Jun Xu,et al.  Extreme value distribution and small failure probabilities estimation of structures subjected to non-stationary stochastic seismic excitations , 2018 .

[22]  Tong Zhou,et al.  Structural reliability analysis via dimension reduction, adaptive sampling, and Monte Carlo simulation , 2020, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[23]  Tong Zhou,et al.  Adaptive Bayesian quadrature based statistical moments estimation for structural reliability analysis , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[25]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  H. Zhang,et al.  Parameter Analysis of the Differential Model of Hysteresis , 2004 .

[27]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2005 .

[28]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability , 1993 .

[29]  Jianbing Chen,et al.  Advances of the probability density evolution method for nonlinear stochastic systems , 2012 .

[30]  Brian Williams,et al.  Gradient free active subspace construction using Morris screening elementary effects , 2016, Comput. Math. Appl..

[31]  Jianbing Chen,et al.  The equivalent extreme-value event and evaluation of the structural system reliability , 2007 .

[32]  Haitao Liu,et al.  A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design , 2017, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[33]  Tong Zhou,et al.  An efficient reliability method combining adaptive global metamodel and probability density evolution method , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[34]  Jianbing Chen,et al.  A GF-discrepancy for point selection in stochastic seismic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters , 2016 .

[35]  Guannan Zhang,et al.  A Taylor Expansion‐Based Adaptive Design Strategy for Global Surrogate Modeling With Applications in Groundwater Modeling , 2017 .

[36]  Cristina H. Amon,et al.  Error Metrics and the Sequential Refinement of Kriging Metamodels , 2015 .

[37]  A. Olsson,et al.  On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2003 .

[38]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[39]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[40]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  A general procedure for first/second-order reliabilitymethod (FORM/SORM) , 1999 .

[41]  Tong Zhou,et al.  Kernel principal component analysis-based Gaussian process regression modelling for high-dimensional reliability analysis , 2020, Computers & Structures.