A framework for distributed analytical and hybrid simulations

A framework for multi-platform analytical and multi-component hybrid (testing-analysis) simulations is described in this paper and illustrated with several application examples. The framework allows the integration of various analytical platforms and geographically distributed experimental facilities into a comprehensive pseudo-dynamic hybrid simulation. The object-oriented architecture of the framework enables easy inclusion of new analysis platforms or experimental models, and the addition of a multitude of auxiliary components, such as data acquisition and camera control. Four application examples are given, namely; (i) multi-platform analysis of a bridge with soil and structural models, (ii) multiplatform, multi-resolution analysis of a high-rise building, (iii) three-site small scale frame hybrid simulation, and (iv) three-site large scale bridge hybrid simulation. These simulations serve as illustrative examples of collaborative research among geographically distributed researchers employing different analysis platforms and testing equipment. The versatility of the framework, ease of including additional modules and the wide application potential demonstrated in the paper provide a rich research environment for structural and geotechnical engineering.

[1]  Tao Wang,et al.  On‐line hybrid test combining with general‐purpose finite element software , 2006 .

[2]  Y. Namita,et al.  Real‐time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber , 1999 .

[3]  Georges Magonette,et al.  Bi‐directional pseudodynamic test of a full‐size three‐storey building , 1999 .

[4]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossings including soil–structure interaction , 2002 .

[5]  Peng Pan,et al.  Online hybrid test by internet linkage of distributed test‐analysis domains , 2005 .

[6]  Pui-Shum B. Shing,et al.  Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests , 1991 .

[7]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Pseudodynamic Method for Seismic Testing , 1985 .

[8]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  A novel predictor–corrector algorithm for sub‐structure pseudo‐dynamic testing , 2006 .

[9]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development of real‐time pseudo dynamic testing , 1992 .

[10]  Paolo Negro,et al.  PsD Test on Four-Story R/C Building Designed According to Eurocodes , 1996 .

[11]  T. Manivannan,et al.  On the accuracy of an implicit algorithm for pseudodynamic tests , 1990 .

[12]  Gregory L. Fenves,et al.  Software framework for distributed experimental–computational simulation of structural systems , 2006 .

[13]  A. Blakeborough,et al.  Improved control algorithm for real‐time substructure testing , 2001 .

[14]  Carol K. Shield,et al.  EFFECTIVE FORCE TESTING: A METHOD OF SEISMIC SIMULATION FOR STRUCTURAL TESTING , 1999 .

[15]  Pierre Pegon,et al.  α-Operator splitting time integration technique for pseudodynamic testing error propagation analysis , 1997 .