Total Variation Processing of Images with Poisson Statistics

This paper deals with denoising of density images with bad Poisson statistics (low count rates), where the reconstruction of the major structures seems the only reasonable task. Obtaining the structures with sharp edges can also be a prerequisite for further processing, e.g. segmentation of objects. A variety of approaches exists in the case of Gaussian noise, but only a few in the Poisson case. We propose some total variation (TV) based regularization techniques adapted to the case of Poisson data, which we derive from approximations of logarithmic a-posteriori probabilities. In order to guarantee sharp edges we avoid the smoothing of the total variation and use a dual approach for the numerical solution. We illustrate and test the feasibility of our approaches for data in positron emission tomography, namely reconstructions of cardiac structures with 18F-FDG and H$_2 \, ^{15}$O tracers, respectively.

[1]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[3]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Image processing and analysis - variational, PDE, wavelet, and stochastic methods , 2005 .

[4]  Ornella Rimoldi,et al.  Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow with H(2)(15)O and 3-dimensional PET: an experimental validation. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Alfredo N. Iusem,et al.  The EM algorithm for ill-posed integral equations: a convergence analysis , 2007 .

[6]  M. Wernick,et al.  Emission Tomography: The Fundamentals of PET and SPECT , 2004 .

[7]  M. Bertero,et al.  Iterative image reconstruction : a point of view , 2007 .

[8]  H. Engl,et al.  CORRIGENDUM: The expectation-maximization algorithm for ill-posed integral equations: a convergence analysis , 2007 .

[9]  Thomas J. Asaki,et al.  A Variational Approach to Reconstructing Images Corrupted by Poisson Noise , 2007, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[10]  Martin Benning,et al.  A Nonlinear Variational Method for Improved , 2008 .

[11]  L. Evans Measure theory and fine properties of functions , 1992 .

[12]  Frank Natterer,et al.  Mathematical methods in image reconstruction , 2001, SIAM monographs on mathematical modeling and computation.

[13]  Michael Frazier,et al.  Studies in Advanced Mathematics , 2004 .

[14]  Otmar Scherzer,et al.  Variational Methods in Imaging , 2008, Applied mathematical sciences.

[15]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[16]  ANTONIN CHAMBOLLE,et al.  An Algorithm for Total Variation Minimization and Applications , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[17]  Martin Burger,et al.  Bregman-EM-TV Methods with Application to Optical Nanoscopy , 2009, SSVM.

[18]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[19]  C. Vogel,et al.  Analysis of bounded variation penalty methods for ill-posed problems , 1994 .

[20]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  M. Burger,et al.  Accurate EM-TV algorithm in PET with low SNR , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.