Adaptable model for assessing sustainability in higher education

Many universities have started to measure sustainability, and many tools have been developed to assist them in this process. For universities at an early stage of sustainability implementation, choosing a tool that fits their specific context is an important step in their assessment process. The goal of this paper is to introduce an Adaptable Model for Assessing Sustainability into higher education institutions that enable the assessment of sustainability within different implementation stages and data availability scenarios. The model's design was based on previous experiences in the field of sustainability in higher education, and takes into account international declarations and other assessment models. The result is a model based on a four tiered hierarchy, with three main criteria: institutional commitment, example setting, and advancing sustainability. In order to establish the weight assigned to each tier of the proposed hierarchy, the analytic hierarchy process was applied. The results of this process showed a preference for institutional commitment and example setting/leadership criteria, with weights of 36.1%and 38.2% respectively, and less preference for the advancing sustainability criterion, with a weight of 25.7%. The resulting model enables the assessment of sustainability within different contexts while maintaining a universal methodological approach; this allows for comparison within a cluster of institutions with similar contexts. The assessment model could be used to improve other assessment tools by following the same process used to build the model, facilitating the participation of stakeholders and experts.

[1]  Rebeka Lukman,et al.  What are the key elements of a sustainable university? , 2007 .

[2]  Rebeka Lukman,et al.  University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators , 2010 .

[3]  Michael Shriberg Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory , 2002 .

[4]  Omidreza Saadatian,et al.  Identifying Strength and Weakness of Sustainable Higher Educational Assessment Approaches , 2011 .

[5]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Sustainability assessment of hydrogen energy systems , 2004 .

[6]  Audrey L Mayer,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. , 2008, Environment international.

[7]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  A tool for a Graphical Assessment of Sustainability in Universities (GASU) , 2006 .

[8]  Nora Munguia,et al.  Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions: An appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutions , 2005 .

[9]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  Assessing sustainability in university curricula: exploring the influence of student numbers and course credits , 2013 .

[10]  A. K. Dikshit,et al.  Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry , 2007 .

[11]  F. Colijn,et al.  A quantitative method for description & assessment of ecosystems: The AMOEBA-approach , 1991 .

[12]  A. Cortese THE CRITICAL ROLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN CREATING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE , 2003 .

[13]  Nicholas Tate,et al.  What Is Education For , 1999 .

[14]  W. Wu,et al.  Comparing the aggregation methods in the analytic hierarchy process when uniform distribution , 2008 .

[15]  Maria Berrittella,et al.  An Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Evaluation of Transport Policies to Reduce Climate Change Impacts , 2007 .

[16]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[17]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Developing a quantitative tool for sustainability assessment of HEIs , 2011 .

[18]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change , 2006 .

[19]  Michael Shriberg Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education , 2002 .

[20]  A. Hezri,et al.  Sustainability indicator system and policy processes in Malaysia: a framework for utilisation and learning. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  P. Glavič,et al.  How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability , 2005 .

[22]  Jairo H. Garcia Assessment of education for sustainable development in universities in Costa Rica: implications for Latin America and the Caribbean , 2010 .

[23]  Togo,et al.  UNIT-BASED SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT TOOL: A resource book to complement the UNEP Mainstreaming Environment and Sustainability in African Universities Partnership , 2009 .

[24]  F. J. Lozano,et al.  Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system , 2013 .

[25]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[26]  D. Shields The role of values and objectives in communicating indicators of sustainability , 2002 .

[27]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..