Risk-aversion: understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration

Teachers who do not integrate technology are often labelled as ‘resistant’ to change. Yet, considerable uncertainties remain about appropriate uses and actual value of technology in teaching and learning, which can make integration and change seem risky. The purpose of this article is to explore the nature of teachers’ analytical and affective risk perceptions, and how these influence decisions to integrate technology in their teaching practice. These ideas are explored through an in-depth qualitative analysis of teacher interviews focusing on experiences with, and beliefs about, technology and teaching. Results suggest decisions to integrate technology in teaching are influenced by negative affective responses to technology, general risk-aversion in teaching, and the perceived value of technology in teaching. The risk analysis framework and findings presented in this paper can be used to support communication with teachers to minimise perceived risks and, where appropriate, help support future technology use.

[1]  Alexa Darby.  Teachers’ emotions in the reconstruction of professional self-understanding , 2008 .

[2]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[3]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Preference for Insuring against Probable Small Losses: Insurance Implications , 1977 .

[4]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Cognitive Processes and Societal Risk Taking , 1976 .

[5]  S. Howard,et al.  Theorising knowledge practices: a missing piece of the educational technology puzzle , 2011 .

[6]  Willem J. Pelgrum,et al.  Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research , 2007 .

[8]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[9]  Sarah Katherine Howard,et al.  Affect and acceptability: exploring teachers’ technology-related risk perceptions , 2011 .

[10]  Donn Ritchie,et al.  What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[11]  K. Frank,et al.  Factors Affecting Technology Uses in Schools: An Ecological Perspective , 2003 .

[12]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Gene Rowe,et al.  A characterisation of the methodology of qualitative research on the nature of perceived risk: trends and omissions , 2008 .

[14]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risk and benefits’, Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, . , 2000 .

[15]  R. Lazarus.  Emotion and Adaptation , 1991 .

[16]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. , 1999 .

[17]  Jeffery D. Wilfong.  Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd rev. ed. , 1947 .

[19]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Personal Values, Beliefs, and Ecological Risk Perception , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Perception of risks. , 2004, Toxicology letters.

[21]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[23]  Sarah Katherine Howard.  Teacher change: Individual and cultural risk perceptions in the context of ICT integration , 2009 .

[24]  P. Fishburn.  The Foundations Of Expected Utility , 2010 .

[25]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Mary Webb,et al.  A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology , 2004 .

[27]  P. Ven,et al.  One teacher's identity, emotions, and commitment to change: A case study into the cognitive–affective processes of a secondary school teacher in the context of reforms , 2005 .

[28]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[29]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Evaluating Risk Communications: Completing and Correcting Mental Models of Hazardous Processes, Part II , 1994 .

[30]  M. Douglas,et al.  Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers , 1983 .

[31]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher Technology Change , 2010 .

[32]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Judgment and decision making: The dance of affect and reason. , 2003 .

[34]  Richard S. Lazanis.  Stress and emotion, a new synthesis , 1999 .

[35]  John Todman,et al.  Effects of qualitative differences in initial and subsequent computer experience on computer anxiety , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  U. Flick.  An introduction to qualitative research, 4th ed. , 2009 .

[37]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Designing risk communications: completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes, Part I. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[38]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? , 2005 .

[39]  Yu-Chu Yeh,et al.  The interactive effects of personal traits and guided practices on preservice teachers' changes in personal teaching efficacy , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[40]  D. Lupton,et al.  Risk and sociocultural theory: Introduction: risk and sociocultural theory , 1999 .

[41]  Willem J. Pelgrum,et al.  Pedagogy and ICT Use : In Schools Around the World Findings from the IEA Sites 2006 Study , 2008 .

[42]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Risk Perception Research , 2000 .

[43]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Designing risk communications , 1994 .

[44]  Introduction and Overview 1.1 Introduction , 2001 .

[45]  Douglas N. Harris,et al.  Models and Predictors of Teacher Effectiveness: A Comparison of Research About Teaching and Other Occupations , 2010 .

[46]  Gary Hackbarth,et al.  Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Janna Fox,et al.  The Writing’s on the Board , 2011 .

[48]  Craig R. Fox,et al.  The Role of Context in the Communication of Uncertain Beliefs , 1998 .

[49]  Jing Lei,et al.  Quantity versus quality: A new approach to examine the relationship between technology use and student outcomes , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[50]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change , 2005 .

[51]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in urban elementary schools , 2003 .

[52]  D. Lupton,et al.  Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives , 2000 .

[53]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates , 2011 .

[54]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.