Phase III Clinical Trial Development: A Process of Chutes and Ladders

Purpose: The Institute of Medicine report on cooperative groups and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) report from the Operational Efficiency Working Group both recommend changes to the processes for opening a clinical trial. This article provides evidence for the need for such changes by completing the first comprehensive review of all the time and steps required to open a phase III oncology clinical trial and discusses the effect of time to protocol activation on subject accrual. Methods: The Dilts and Sandler method was used at four cancer centers, two cooperative groups, and the NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Accrual data were also collected. Results: Opening a phase III cooperative group therapeutic trial requires 769 steps, 36 approvals, and a median of approximately 2.5 years from formal concept review to study opening. Time to activation at one group ranged from 435 to 1,604 days, and time to open at one cancer center ranged from 21 to 836 days. At centers, group trials are significantly more likely to have zero accruals (38.8%) than nongroup trials (20.6%; P < 0.0001). Of the closed NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program–approved phase III clinical trials from 2000 to 2007, 39.1% resulted in <21 accruals. Conclusions: The length, variability, and low accrual results demonstrate the need for the NCI clinical trials system to be reengineered. Improvements will be of only limited effectiveness if done in isolation; there is a need to return to the collaborative spirit with all parties creating an efficient and effective system. Recommendations put forth by the Institute of Medicine and Operational Efficiency Working Group reports, if implemented, will aid this renewal. Clin Cancer Res; 16(22); 5381–9. ©2010 AACR.

[1]  David M. Dilts,et al.  Steps and time to process clinical trials at the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Michelle A. Mathiason,et al.  Nature and outcome of clinical trials conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) from 1977 to 2006. , 2010 .

[3]  S. Nass,et al.  Multi-Center Phase III Clinical Trials and NCI Cooperative Groups: Workshop Summary , 2009 .

[4]  D. Dilts,et al.  A sense of urgency: Evaluating the link between clinical trial development time and the accrual performance of CTEP-sponsored studies. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  D. Steensma Processes to activate phase III clinical trials in a cooperative oncology group: the elephant is monstrous. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  F. Gao,et al.  Time to activate lung cancer clinical trials and patient enrollment: a representative comparison study between two academic centers across the atlantic. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Iztok Hozo,et al.  Treatment success in cancer: new cancer treatment successes identified in phase 3 randomized controlled trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative oncology groups, 1955 to 2006. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  Roger E. Bohn,et al.  Noise and learning in semiconductor manufacturing , 1995 .

[9]  M. Gobbi,et al.  Comparison between patients with Philadelphia-positive chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia who obtained a complete cytogenetic response within 1 year of imatinib therapy and those who achieved such a response after 12 months of treatment. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  C. Runowicz,et al.  Challenges to National Cancer Institute-Supported Cooperative Group Clinical Trial Participation: An ASCO Survey of Cooperative Group Sites. , 2010, Journal of oncology practice.

[11]  R. Gray,et al.  Challenges to accrual predictions to phase III cancer clinical trials: a survey of study chairs and lead statisticians of 248 NCI-sponsored trials , 2011, Clinical trials.

[12]  Richard L Schilsky,et al.  Processes to activate phase III clinical trials in a Cooperative Oncology Group: the Case of Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  David M Dilts,et al.  Invisible barriers to clinical trials: the impact of structural, infrastructural, and procedural barriers to opening oncology clinical trials. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  D. Dilts,et al.  Accrual to clinical trials at selected comprehensive cancer centers , 2008 .

[15]  Robert Gray,et al.  Development of Clinical Trials in a Cooperative Group Setting: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  R. Schilsky Personalizing cancer care: American Society of Clinical Oncology presidential address 2009. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  E. Emanuel,et al.  The costs of conducting clinical research. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Kingshuk K. Sinha,et al.  Applying Process Knowledge for Yield Variation Reduction: A Longitudinal Field Study , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[19]  Scott D Ramsey,et al.  A national cancer clinical trials system for the 21st century: reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  D. Dilts,et al.  A Sense of Urgency: Evaluating the Link between Clinical Trial Development Time and the Accrual Performance of Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (NCI-CTEP) Sponsored Studies , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  J. Cox Seeking serenity with influence. , 2010, Journal of oncology practice.