Surgeon accuracy in the selection of the flexion-extension axis of the elbow: an in vitro study.

The incorrect determination of the flexion-extension axis of the elbow may result in poor clinical outcomes for patients undergoing ligament repairs, joint arthroplasties, and procedures requiring articulated external fixators. The variability in the selection of the flexion-extension axis based on a visual approximation of bony landmarks on the distal humerus was studied within a group of surgeons. Three surgeons of different experience levels independently selected points through which they believed the flexion-extension axis passed on the medial and lateral surfaces of 23 distal humeri. One surgeon repeated the point selection on three separate occasions. These surgeon points were compared with an axis calculated by use of a computer-assisted method that relied on the centers of the trochlear sulcus and capitellum via digitization of these structures. Relative to the computer-generated flexion-extension axis, the error in the surgeons' selections resulted in a mean frontal plane angle of 1.5 degrees +/- 3.0 degrees valgus (range, 6.3 degrees varus to 9.6 degrees valgus) and a coronal plane angle of 1.6 degrees +/- 3.3 degrees external rotation (range, 8.3 degrees internal rotation to 10.2 degrees external rotation). These results suggest that the use of a computer-assisted surgical technique will allow a more accurate determination of the flexion-extension axis of the elbow, which may lead to improved clinical outcomes in patients treated with ligament repairs or reconstructions, elbow arthroplasties, or articulated external fixators.

[1]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Single-strand ligament reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament restores valgus elbow stability. , 2002, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  A. Inglis,et al.  A critical analysis of alignment factors affecting functional outcome in total elbow arthroplasty. , 1986, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  T D Brown,et al.  Radiographic determinants of the elbow rotation axis: Experimental identification and quantitative validation , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  Peter S. Walker,et al.  Biomechanical basis for elbow hinge-distractor design. , 1987 .

[5]  B F Morrey,et al.  Loose-hinge total elbow arthroplasty. An experimental study of the effects of implant alignment on three-dimensional elbow kinematics. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  A Burkart,et al.  Precision of ACL tunnel placement using traditional and robotic techniques. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[7]  H E Veeger,et al.  Determination of the optimal elbow axis for evaluation of placement of prostheses. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  J. London Kinematics of the elbow. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  E. Chao,et al.  Passive motion of the elbow joint. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Bernard F. Morrey,et al.  The Elbow and Its Disorders , 2000 .

[11]  T D Brown,et al.  Hinged external fixation of the elbow: optimal axis alignment to minimize motion resistance. , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  A. Lundberg,et al.  Variation in the position and orientation of the elbow flexion axis. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Metallic radial head arthroplasty improves valgus stability of the elbow. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.