Abnormal reliance on object structure in apraxics' learning of novel object-related actions

We assessed the prediction that object structural cues could benefit the learning of object–action relationships in ideomotor apraxia (IMA). A total of 15 patients with left-hemisphere stroke, 11 of whom exhibited IMA, and 10 healthy subjects were trained to match novel gestures to novel tool pictures that were either High- or Low-Afforded by their associated tools. Learning was assessed with recognition and production tests. Only IMA patients demonstrated better recognition of High- than Low-Afforded gestures, and their recognition of High-Afforded gestures was statistically comparable to the other groups. This finding suggests that apraxics may rely abnormally on object structure when learning to associate novel gestures and tools. Finally, the “affordance benefit” was associated with relative sparing of structures in the dorsal visual processing stream. These data are consistent with the proposal that two routes may mediate skilled action, one specialized for stored information, and the other responsive to object structure, and that deficient gesture learning may be compensated by “bootstrapping” intact dorsal stream coding of action. (JINS, 2007, 13, 997–1008.)

[1]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[2]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[3]  L. Bérubé,et al.  [Clinical neuropsychology]. , 1982, Nursing Quebec.

[4]  E. Renzi,et al.  Modality-specific and supramodal mechanisms of apraxia. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  K. Heilman,et al.  Two forms of ideomotor apraxia , 1982, Neurology.

[6]  K. Heilman,et al.  Acquisition and retention of gestures by apraxic patients , 1984, Brain and Cognition.

[7]  K M Heilman,et al.  Apraxia and the supplementary motor area. , 1986, Archives of neurology.

[8]  K M Heilman,et al.  Spatial planning deficits in limb apraxia. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Angela Sirigu,et al.  A Selective Impairment of Hand Posture for Object Utilization in Apraxia , 1995, Cortex.

[10]  H. Sakata,et al.  Parietal neurons related to memory-guided hand manipulation. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.

[12]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  A Parietal-Frontal Circuit for Hand Grasping Movements in the Monkey: Evidence from Reversible Inactivation Experiments , 1997 .

[13]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Modeling parietal-premotor interactions in primate control of grasping , 1998, Neural Networks.

[16]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Grasping objects and grasping action meanings: the dual role of monkey rostroventral premotor cortex (area F5). , 1998, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[18]  H. Tanabe,et al.  Role of Somatosensory Feedback from Tools in Realizing Movements by Patients with Ideomotor Apraxia , 1999, European Neurology.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. , 1999 .

[20]  J A Fiez,et al.  Lesion segmentation and manual warping to a reference brain: Intra‐ and interobserver reliability , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[21]  R T Knight,et al.  Neural representations of skilled movement. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  R. Ellis,et al.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[23]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[24]  H. Sakata,et al.  Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  J B Poline,et al.  Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[27]  A. Milner,et al.  Grasping the past delay can improve visuomotor performance , 2001, Current Biology.

[28]  L. Buxbaum Ideomotor Apraxia: a Call to Action , 2001, Neurocase.

[29]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The Cortical Motor System , 2001, Neuron.

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  Kenneth M Heilman,et al.  Postural knowledge of transitive pantomimes and intransitive gestures , 2002, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[32]  J. Norman Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[33]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Visual Search Is Modulated by Action Intentions , 2002, Psychological science.

[34]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Motor affordance and its role for visual working memory: evidence from fMRI studies. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[37]  F. Garbarini,et al.  At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[38]  A. Milner,et al.  Automatic avoidance of obstacles is a dorsal stream function: evidence from optic ataxia , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  J Hermsdörfer,et al.  The effect of tactile feedback on pantomime of tool use in apraxia , 2004, Neurology.

[40]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Underlying Imitation Learning of Hand Actions An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2004, Neuron.

[41]  A. Milner,et al.  Erratum: Automatic avoidance of obstacles is a dorsal stream function: evidence from optic ataxia , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  On beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[43]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[44]  Laurel J. Buxbaum,et al.  Deficient internal models for planning hand–object interactions in apraxia , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Selection-for-action in visual search. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[46]  Garry Young,et al.  Are different affordances subserved by different neural pathways? , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[47]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI , 2006, Brain Research.

[48]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Spatial and kinematic features of apraxic movement depend on the mode of execution , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  S. Frey What Puts the How in Where? Tool Use and the Divided Visual Streams Hypothesis , 2007, Cortex.

[50]  Ed Symes,et al.  Visual object affordances: object orientation. , 2007, Acta psychologica.