The Intrafirm Complexity of Systemically Important Financial Institutions

In November, 2011, the Financial Stability Board, in collaboration with the International Monetary Fund, published a list of 29 "systemically important financial institutions" (SIFIs). This designation reflects a concern that the failure of any one of them could have dramatic negative consequences for the global economy and is based on "their size, complexity, and systemic interconnectedness". While the characteristics of "size" and "systemic interconnectedness" have been the subject of a good deal of quantitative analysis, less attention has been paid to measures of a firm's "complexity." In this paper we take on the challenges of measuring the complexity of a financial institution and to that end explore the use of the structure of an individual firm's control hierarchy as a proxy for institutional complexity. The control hierarchy is a network representation of the institution and its subsidiaries. We show that this mathematical representation (and various associated metrics) provides a consistent way to compare the complexity of firms with often very disparate business models and as such may provide the foundation for determining a SIFI designation. By quantifying the level of complexity of a firm, our approach also may prove useful should firms need to reduce their level of complexity either in response to business or regulatory needs. Using a data set containing the control hierarchies of many of the designated SIFIs, we find that in the past two years, these firms have decreased their level of complexity, perhaps in response to regulatory requirements.

[1]  Fabrizio Lillo,et al.  Correlation, Hierarchies, and Networks in Financial Markets , 2008, 0809.4615.

[2]  J. Crémer.  A Partial Theory of the Optimal Organization of a Bureaucracy , 1980 .

[3]  Stefan Thurner,et al.  Risk trading, network topology and banking regulation , 2003 .

[4]  D. Watts.  The “New” Science of Networks , 2004 .

[5]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[6]  J. Mirrlees.  The Optimal Structure of Incentives and Authority Within an Organization , 1976 .

[7]  D. Rockmore,et al.  Topological structures in the equities market network , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Vickery,et al.  A Structural View of U.S. Bank Holding Companies , 2012 .

[9]  Nikolaus Hautsch,et al.  Financial Network Systemic Risk Contributions , 2013 .

[10]  Stefan Thurner,et al.  Network and eigenvalue analysis of financial transaction networks , 2009 .

[11]  Daniel N. Rockmore,et al.  Overlapping portfolios, contagion, and financial stability , 2015 .

[12]  M. Pascual,et al.  Ecological networks : Linking structure to dynamics in food webs , 2006 .

[13]  Nikolaus Hautsch,et al.  Forecasting Systemic Impact in Financial Networks , 2013 .

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .

[15]  George Sugihara,et al.  Ecology for bankers , 2008 .

[16]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions , 2004, Internet Math..

[17]  J. Kleinberg,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets , 2010 .

[18]  D. Garlaschelli,et al.  Early-warning signals of topological collapse in interbank networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Michael Boss,et al.  Network topology of the interbank market , 2003, cond-mat/0309582.

[20]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  On the Informational Properties of Trading Networks , 2009 .

[21]  Scott D. Pauls,et al.  Stability of the World Trade Web over Time - An Extinction Analysis , 2011, 1104.4380.

[22]  Stefano Battiston,et al.  The Network of Global Corporate Control , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  DebtRank: Too Central to Fail? Financial Networks, the FED and Systemic Risk , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Janet L. Yellen.  Macroprudential Supervision and Monetary Policy in the Post-crisis World , 2011 .

[25]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Googling Food Webs: Can an Eigenvector Measure Species' Importance for Coextinctions? , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  D. Teece,et al.  Organizational Structure and Economic Performance: A Test of the Multidivisional Hypothesis , 1978 .

[27]  D. Watts,et al.  A generalized model of social and biological contagion. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  Julia Grant,et al.  Complexity and Analyst Following of Multinational Firms , 2000 .

[29]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..