A quantitative assessment on the placement practices of gas detectors in the process industries

Abstract Gas detection is an important safety system with interfaces to several other safety safeguards. However, the generality of the regulations, standards and recommended practices in conjunction with the inherent challenges of the gas detector placement problem, has resulted in a widespread use of prescriptive and qualitative detector placement strategies. In order to take advantage of the quantitative information provided by dispersion simulations, a stochastic programming formulation (SP-UV) was previously proposed, developed and validated by the authors. This formulation identifies the gas detector layout that minimizes the expected value of an overall damage coefficient (i.e., the minimization of a risk metric) given a set of dispersion scenarios. Results demonstrated the potential and suitability of numerical optimization to solve the gas detector placement problem while rigorously considering its inherent uncertainties. In this work, four existing approaches for gas detector placement were implemented and compared with the previously proposed quantitative optimization-based approach using three different performance metrics in accordance to the objectives of gas detection systems. Results provide evidence on the effectiveness of the use of dispersion simulations, and mathematical programming, to supplement the gas detector placement problem.

[1]  Krishnendu Chakrabarty,et al.  Sensor placement for effective coverage and surveillance in distributed sensor networks , 2003, 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003..

[2]  Mohammad Modarres Reliability engineering and risk analysis , 1999 .

[3]  Carl D. Laird,et al.  A Stochastic Programming Approach for the Optimal Placement of Gas Detectors: Unavailability and Voting Strategies , 2014 .

[4]  S. Hakimi Optimum Distribution of Switching Centers in a Communication Network and Some Related Graph Theoretic Problems , 1965 .

[5]  Ronald W Lee,et al.  A risk-based sensor placement methodology. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  Richard L. Church,et al.  The maximal covering location problem , 1974 .

[7]  Jay P. Boris,et al.  Using CT-Analyst to optimize sensor placement , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  Emel Kizilkaya Aydogan,et al.  Chemical agent detector placement methodology , 2008, Appl. Math. Comput..

[9]  Robert D. Carr,et al.  Designing Contamination Warning Systems for Municipal Water Networks Using Imperfect Sensors , 2009 .

[10]  S. Connolly,et al.  Evaluation of Flammable Gas Detector Networks Based on Experimental Simulations of Offshore, High Pressure Gas Releases , 2002 .

[11]  Carl D. Laird,et al.  A stochastic programming approach for gas detector placement using CFD-based dispersion simulations , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[12]  Charles ReVelle,et al.  Central Facilities Location , 2010 .

[13]  Oded Berman,et al.  Facility Reliability Issues in Network p-Median Problems: Strategic Centralization and Co-Location Effects , 2007, Oper. Res..

[14]  Carl D. Laird,et al.  Optimal gas detector placement under uncertainty considering Conditional-Value-at-Risk , 2013 .

[15]  Stephen Defriend,et al.  A risk-based approach to flammable gas detector spacing. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  S. Connolly,et al.  Sensitivity Studies of Offshore Gas Detector Networks Based on Experimental Simulations of High Pressure Gas Releases , 2005 .

[17]  John Daniel Siirola,et al.  A Stochastic Programming Approach for Gas Detector Placement in Process Facilities. , 2011 .

[18]  Prankul Middha,et al.  CFD‐based risk assessment for hydrogen applications , 2008 .

[19]  Prankul Middha,et al.  Equivalent cloud methods used for explosion risk and consequence studies , 2013 .