LPI Radar Waveform Recognition Based on CNN and TPOT

The electronic reconnaissance system is the operational guarantee and premise of electronic warfare. It is an important tool for intercepting radar signals and providing intelligence support for sensing the battlefield situation. In this paper, a radar waveform automatic identification system for detecting, tracking and locating low probability interception (LPI) radar is studied. The recognition system can recognize 12 different radar waveform: binary phase shift keying (Barker codes modulation), linear frequency modulation (LFM), Costas codes, polytime codes (T1, T2, T3, and T4), and polyphase codes (comprising Frank, P1, P2, P3 and P4). First, the system performs time–frequency transform on the LPI radar signal to obtain a two-dimensional time–frequency image. Then, the time–frequency image is preprocessed (binarization and size conversion). The preprocessed time–frequency image is then sent to the convolutional neural network (CNN) for training. After the training is completed, the features of the fully connected layer are extracted. Finally, the feature is sent to the tree structure-based machine learning process optimization (TPOT) classifier to realize offline training and online recognition. The experimental results show that the overall recognition rate of the system reaches 94.42% when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is −4 dB.

[1]  Phillip E. Pace,et al.  Autonomous Time-Frequency Morphological Feature Extraction Algorithm for LPI Radar Modulation Classification , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[2]  V. Koivunen,et al.  Automatic Radar Waveform Recognition , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[3]  Fulei Chu,et al.  Recent advances in time–frequency analysis methods for machinery fault diagnosis: A review with application examples , 2013 .

[4]  Lie Xu,et al.  Improvement of the Hilbert Method via ESPRIT for Detecting Rotor Fault in Induction Motors at Low Slip , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[5]  Wei Zuo,et al.  Robust radar waveform recognition algorithm based on random projections and sparse classification , 2014 .

[6]  Ming Zhang,et al.  LPI Radar Waveform Recognition Based on Time-Frequency Distribution , 2016, Sensors.

[7]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Automatic Cognitive Radio Waveform Recognition , 2017, IEEE Access.

[8]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Neural Networks for Radar Waveform Recognition , 2017, Symmetry.

[9]  K. D. Rao,et al.  Automatic Intrapulse Modulation Classification of Advanced LPI Radar Waveforms , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  Zhiyu Qu,et al.  Radar Signal Intra-Pulse Modulation Recognition Based on Convolutional Neural Network , 2018, IEEE Access.

[11]  Shuang Wang,et al.  Radar Waveform Recognition Based on Time-Frequency Analysis and Artificial Bee Colony-Support Vector Machine , 2018 .

[12]  Ping Li,et al.  Adaptive time‐frequency representation for weak chirp signals based on Duffing oscillator stopping oscillation system , 2018 .

[13]  Jiaqiu Ai,et al.  SRAD-CNN for adaptive synthetic aperture radar image classification , 2018, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[14]  Tao Chen,et al.  LPI Radar Waveform Recognition Based on Multi-Branch MWC Compressed Sampling Receiver , 2018, IEEE Access.

[15]  Phillip E. Pace,et al.  An Antenna for a Mast-Mounted Low Probability of Intercept Continuous Wave Radar: Improving Performance With Digital Architecture , 2019, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[16]  Yaser Norouzi,et al.  Reduced complexity and near optimum detector for linear‐frequency‐modulated and phase‐modulated LPI radar signals , 2019, IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation.

[17]  Kai Zeng,et al.  A Local Metric for Defocus Blur Detection Based on CNN Feature Learning , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[18]  Akhil Garg,et al.  Maximization of extraction of Cadmium and Zinc during recycling of spent battery mix: An application of combined genetic programming and simulated annealing approach , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[19]  Baoping Tang,et al.  Operational modal parameter identification based on PCA-CWT , 2019, Measurement.

[20]  Shiguang Shan,et al.  Occlusion Aware Facial Expression Recognition Using CNN With Attention Mechanism , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Bo Wang,et al.  Judgement of critical state of water film rupture on corrugated plate wall based on SIFT feature selection algorithm and SVM classification method , 2019, Nuclear Engineering and Design.

[22]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Classification of myocardial infarction with multi-lead ECG signals and deep CNN , 2019, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[23]  Azadeh Alsadat Emrani Zarandi,et al.  An efficient inexact Full Adder cell design in CNFET technology with high-PSNR for image processing , 2019, International Journal of Electronics.