Website accessibility in the tourism industry: an analysis of official national tourism organization websites around the world

Abstract Purpose: To analyze the accessibility of official national tourism organization websites of countries around the world, in order to establish possible common patterns and rankings of those with exemplary practice through to those with the highest number of issues. The purpose for undertaking such an analysis is to provide a quasi-indicator of inclusive organizational practice for online accessibility for both destination managers and their accessible tourism consumers – domestic and overseas people with disability visiting the websites. Method: The official tourism websites of 210 countries included in the latest World Tourism Organization report were analyzed. A website accessibility evaluation tool (website accessible test) was used in the analysis, according to AA and AAA levels of conformance to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 requirements. Results: Different patterns compliance to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 were established for the clusters, which were rather similar for both AA and AAA conformance levels. The main issues in the least accessible websites were also identified, mainly focused on the following guidelines: navigable, compatible, adaptability, text alternatives and also referred to other assistive technologies. Conclusions: Once the main issues were established several alternatives are suggested to address them, such as implementing more prescriptive laws and regulations, complying with mandatory benchmark standards and/or having external agencies audit website designs. However, in addition to using benchmark standards, efforts to improve this situation should also be made by programmers, who should also rely on preexistent experiences and develop more dynamic knowledge. This knowledge may include text alternatives for any nontext content; creation of content that can be presented in different ways without losing information; provide ways to help users navigate, find content, determine where they are and navigate websites to maximize compatibility with assistive technologies and user agents. Implications for rehabilitation Access to information – in this case, online information – is an important factor in the process of rehabilitation for people with disability and those supporting them. Failure to apply homogeneous criteria for website accessibility around the world can hamper access to information by people with disabilities. Travel planning requires access to mainstream tourist distribution networks where online inclusive practice is a precursor to information searching. Documents for destination managers and programmers the main problems of accessibility to websites and examples of models or solutions to follow and not. Establish the main inclusive website design criteria on which to focus on improving the access of people with disabilities to websites (e.g., text alternatives, content presented in different ways, navigating and improving compatibility with assistive technologies etc.).

[1]  J. J. Burnett What services marketers need to know about the mobility‐ disabled consumer , 1996 .

[2]  Trinidad Domínguez Vila,et al.  Economic profitability of accessible tourism for the tourism sector in Spain , 2013 .

[3]  Dimitris Michailakis,et al.  Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities , 1995, Human Rights and Disabled Persons.

[4]  Claire Paddison,et al.  A proposed architecture for integrating accessibility test tools , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[5]  J. White The Americans with Disabilities Act. , 1996, Ohio nurses review.

[6]  Yuquan Shi,et al.  E-Government Web Site Accessibility in Australia and China , 2006 .

[7]  U. Gretzel,et al.  Designing persuasive destination websites: A mental imagery processing perspective , 2012 .

[8]  Amjad Mehmood,et al.  Web Accessibility for Disabled: A Case Study of Government Websites in Pakistan , 2012, 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology.

[9]  Stefano Federici,et al.  Checking an integrated model of web accessibility and usability evaluation for disabled people , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[10]  Youcheng Wang,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of US official state tourism websites , 2011 .

[11]  T. Domínguez,et al.  Economic Profitability of Accessible Tourism for the Tourism Sector in Spain , 2013 .

[12]  Simon Darcy,et al.  The trouble with travel: people with disabilities and tourism , 1999 .

[13]  José Fernández Cavia,et al.  Calidad de los sitios web turísticos oficiales de las comunidades autónomas españolas , 2013 .

[14]  Shane Pegg,et al.  Travelers and tourists with disabilities: a matter of priorities and loyalties. , 2005 .

[15]  Dimitrios Buhalis,et al.  Information-enabled tourism destination marketing: addressing the accessibility market , 2011 .

[16]  Fang Wang,et al.  A relationship-building model for the Web retail marketplace , 2000, Internet Res..

[17]  Dimitrios Buhalis,et al.  Progress in tourism management : a review of website evaluation in tourism research , 2010 .

[18]  Michael R. Hyman,et al.  Common Practices in Destination Website Design , 2012 .

[19]  John Tribe,et al.  TOURISM: A SITE OF RESISTANCE STRATEGIES OF INDIVIDUALS WITH A DISABILITY , 2013 .

[20]  Ye Zhang,et al.  Dimensions of lodging guest satisfaction among guests with mobility challenges: A mixed-method analysis of web-based texts , 2016 .

[21]  Hui Xiong,et al.  Understanding of Internal Clustering Validation Measures , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[22]  Rob Law,et al.  A review of website evaluation studies in the tourism and hospitality fields from 1996 to 2009 , 2011 .

[23]  J. Panel Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2013 .

[24]  Klaus Oestreicher,et al.  Global e-government Web Accessibility: An Empirical Examination of EU, Asia and African Sites , 2009, ICTA.

[25]  Bernadette McSherry,et al.  The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. , 2008, Journal of law and medicine.

[26]  T. Huan,et al.  Performance evaluation of tourism websites' information quality of four global destination brands: Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Taipei , 2014 .

[27]  U. Gretzel,et al.  Internet Technology Use by American Convention and Visitors Bureaus , 2003 .

[28]  R. Pagán,et al.  The contribution of holiday trips to life satisfaction: the case of people with disabilities , 2015 .

[29]  Nigel Morgan,et al.  Re)Envisioning tourism and visual impairment , 2010 .

[30]  Dimitrios Buhalis,et al.  Best practice in accessible tourism : inclusion, disability, ageing population and tourism , 2012 .

[31]  Nina M. Ray,et al.  “Ebilities” tourism: an exploratory discussion of the travel needs and motivations of the mobility-disabled , 2003 .

[32]  Friedrich Leisch,et al.  Evaluation of structure and reproducibility of cluster solutions using the bootstrap , 2010 .

[33]  Luis Ferreira,et al.  PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ACCESS , 1998 .

[34]  José Fernández-Cavia,et al.  Web quality index (WQI) for official tourist destination websites: proposal for an assessment system , 2014 .

[35]  Joanne Kuzma,et al.  Analysis of U.S. Senate Web Sites For Disability Accessibility , 2009 .

[36]  Hildegard Rumetshofer,et al.  Tourism Information Systems Promoting Barrier-Free Tourism for People with Disabilities , 2004, ICCHP.

[37]  Jo Mackiewicz,et al.  A usability analysis of municipal government website home pages in Alabama , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  T. D. Vila,et al.  UN NUEVO DESAFÍO: EL CONTENIDO Y LA ACCESIBILIDAD AL CONTENIDO DE LAS WEB TURÍSTICAS ESPAÑOLAS , 2009 .

[39]  Bob McKercher,et al.  Understanding the complex interplay between tourism, disability and environmental contexts , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[40]  S. Lewthwaite Web accessibility standards and disability: developing critical perspectives on accessibility , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation.

[41]  Dimitrios Buhalis,et al.  Accessible tourism: concepts and issues. , 2011 .

[42]  Ina Freeman,et al.  French versus Canadian Tourism: Response to the Disabled , 2010 .

[43]  M. B. A. Mourad,et al.  Accessibility Evaluation of Dubai e-Government Websites: Findings and Implications , 2013 .

[44]  Michael G. Paciello Web Accessibility for People with Disabilities , 2000 .

[45]  Te-Wei Wang,et al.  A comparison of the official tourism website of five east tourism destinations , 2014, J. Inf. Technol. Tour..

[46]  Joseph L. Cavinato,et al.  Transportation and Tourism for the Disabled: An Assessment , 1992 .

[47]  L. Dwyer,et al.  Economic contribution of tourists with disabilities: an Australian approach and methodology. , 2010 .

[48]  Mustafa Al-Radaideh,et al.  Evaluating Accessibility of Jordanian E-Government Websites for People with Disabilities , 2011 .

[49]  Wan Abdul Rahim Wan Mohd Isa,et al.  Assessing the Usability and Accessibility of Malaysia E-Government Website , 2011 .

[50]  Dan Comden,et al.  Seeking Predictors of Web Accessibility in U.S. Higher Education Institutions , 2013 .

[51]  Russell Williams,et al.  Meeting the on‐line needs of disabled tourists: an assessment of UK‐based hotel websites , 2006 .

[52]  Simon Darcy,et al.  A Whole-of-Life Approach to Tourism: The Case for Accessible Tourism Experiences , 2009 .

[53]  Md. Javed Hossain,et al.  Accessibility Analysis and Evaluation of Government-Websites' in Developing Countries: Case Study Bangladesh , 2012 .

[54]  Yakup Akgül,et al.  Web Accessibility Evaluation of Government Websites for People with Disabilities in Turkey , 2016 .

[55]  Yüksel Öztürk,et al.  Is the Turkish tourism industry ready for a disabled customer's market?: The views of hotel and travel agency managers , 2008 .

[56]  Simon Darcy,et al.  Inherent complexity: Disability, accessible tourism and accommodation information preferences , 2010 .

[57]  Computers Helping People with Special Needs , 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[58]  Gyan P. Nyaupane,et al.  Understanding Travel Constraints: Application and Extension of a Leisure Constraints Model , 2008 .

[59]  Franz Pühretmair,et al.  It's Time to Make eTourism Accessible , 2004, ICCHP.

[60]  D. H Metz,et al.  Mobility of older people and their quality of life , 2000 .

[61]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Travel agents as facilitators or inhibitors of travel: perceptions of people with disabilities. , 2003 .

[62]  Dimitrios Buhalis,et al.  eTourism: Information technology for strategic tourism management , 2003 .

[63]  Cristina Espadinha,et al.  Accessibility of Portuguese Public Universities' sites , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[64]  M. Knežević,et al.  Attitude change towards guests with disabilities: Reflections From Tourism Students , 2011 .

[65]  Joseph T. O'Leary,et al.  What does the consumer want from a DMO website? A study of US and Canadian tourists' perspectives. , 2007 .

[66]  Young A. Park,et al.  Success Factors for Destination Marketing Web Sites: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[67]  J. J. Burnett,et al.  Assessing the Travel-Related Behaviors of the Mobility-Disabled Consumer , 2001 .

[68]  Maeve Paris,et al.  Website accessibility: a survey of local e-government websites and legislation in Northern Ireland , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[69]  Aïda Valls,et al.  Extending Concordance and Discordance Relations to Hierarchical Sets of Criteria in ELECTRE-III Method , 2012, MDAI.

[70]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Digital Quality of Life: Understanding the Personal and Social Benefits of the Information Technology Revolution , 2008 .

[71]  Youcheng Wang,et al.  Conceptualizing and evaluating the functions of destination marketing systems , 2007 .

[72]  Eleni Michopoulou,et al.  Enabling access to tourism through information schemes , 2008 .

[73]  B. Mckercher,et al.  TRAVELING WITH A DISABILITY More than an Access Issue , 2004 .

[74]  D. Papatsenko,et al.  How the Dorsal gradient works: Insights from postgenome technologies , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  Elisabeth Kastenholz,et al.  Contributions of tourism to social inclusion of persons with disability , 2015 .

[76]  Liang Tang,et al.  Investigating the Routes of Communication on Destination Websites , 2012 .

[77]  T. Coles,et al.  Access, disability, and tourism: changing responses in the United Kingdom. , 2005 .

[78]  Margaret J. Daniels,et al.  “Travel Tales”: an interpretive analysis of constraints and negotiations to pleasure travel as experienced by persons with physical disabilities , 2005 .

[79]  Morten Goodwin,et al.  Global Web Accessibility Analysis of National Government Portals and Ministry Web Sites , 2011 .