Blowflies as a Case Study in Non-Linear Population Dynamics

Time series have provided the stimulus for generating the central hypotheses in population ecology (regulation by endogenous factors vs. exogenous control; stability vs. instability; equilibria vs. cycles vs. chaos etc.). Time-series analysis also provides the first (and sometimes the sole) approach to testing competing hypotheses (Turchin and Ellner, this volume). Yet the last five years have shown that there is no simple means of characterising complex dynamic behaviour such as chaos in real ecological data (i.e. data sets that are short by physicists’ standards and noisy by any standards), despite early optimism about approaches such as non-linear forecasting (Sugihara and May, 1990; Ellner and Turchin, 1995). Most ecological time series are doubly flawed from a scientific point of view - they are insufficiently long and detailed for modern dynamical analysis, and they are unreplicated. Advances in computation have helped to alleviate the first problem, for example cross- validation has provided a very powerful aid to model selection (Turchin and Ellner, this volume); the universality of noise in ecology, however, renders interpretation of point estimates of any aspect of dynamics dubious.

[1]  R. Smith,et al.  Effects of population density and cadmium toxicity on growth and survival of blowflies. , 1993, Environmental pollution.

[2]  George Sugihara,et al.  Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series , 1990, Nature.

[3]  A. Wolf,et al.  Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series , 1985 .

[4]  G Sugihara,et al.  Distinguishing error from chaos in ecological time series. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  Michael Bruce. Forrest Toxins and blowfly population dynamics. , 1996 .

[6]  R. Costantino,et al.  Experimentally induced transitions in the dynamic behaviour of insect populations , 1995, Nature.

[7]  A. Nicholson An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. , 1954 .

[8]  J. Yorke,et al.  Coping with chaos. Analysis of chaotic data and the exploitation of chaotic systems , 1994 .

[9]  Henry D. I. Abarbanel,et al.  Tools for the Analysis of Chaotic Data , 1997 .

[10]  P. Turchin Reconstructing endogenous dynamics of a laboratory Drosophila population , 1991 .

[11]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Complex Dynamics in Ecological Time Series , 1992 .

[12]  Jesse A. Logan,et al.  Chaos and insect ecology , 1990 .

[13]  A. Gallant,et al.  Finding Chaos in Noisy Systems , 1992 .

[14]  R Mead,et al.  The dynamics of discrete-time stochastic models of population growth. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[16]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Chaos in a Noisy World: New Methods and Evidence from Time-Series Analysis , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[17]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Automatic Smoothing Spline Projection Pursuit , 1994 .

[18]  Ian P. Woiwod,et al.  Estimating Chaos in an Insect Population , 1997 .

[19]  Brian Dennis,et al.  Chaotic Dynamics in an Insect Population , 1997, Science.

[20]  J. Readshaw,et al.  Age-specific survival, fecundity and fertility of the adult blowfly, Lucilia cuprina, in relation to crowding, protein food and population cycles , 1983 .

[21]  A. N. Sharkovskiĭ Dynamic systems and turbulence , 1989 .

[22]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Modelling Time-Series Data , 2000 .

[23]  R. Smith,et al.  A simple larval diet for population studies on the blowfly Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) , 1991, Medical and veterinary entomology.

[24]  Ian P. Woiwod,et al.  Using Response-Surface Methodology to Detect Chaos in Ecological Time Series , 1993 .