Assessing quality of life after traumatic brain injury: examination of the short form 36 health survey.

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has an important role in the comprehensive assessment of patient recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We examined the validity of domain and summary scores derived from the Medical Outcomes Survey 36-Item Short Form Health Questionnaire (SF-36) as outcome measures for TBI in a prospective study of 514 patients with a range of functional impairment (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended [GOSE] scores 3-8). Item scaling criteria for the eight domain scores were tested and principal component analysis was used to examine if physical and mental component summary scores were valid. External validity was assessed by comparison with GOSE. Mean response, variance, and distribution of the items were largely equivalent, and item-own scale correlations corrected for overlap all exceeded the threshold for equivalent contribution to domain scores and convergent validity. All corrected item-own scale correlations were greater than the respective item-other correlations indicating no scaling failures, and reliability coefficients for the domain scores were high and substantially more than the inter-domain correlations. Overall, criteria for summing items into domain scores were satisfied, and there was a significant relationship of increasing score with more favorable GOSE class across all domains. However, there were floor and/or ceiling effects in four of the eight domains, and principal component analysis of the domain scores demonstrated only a unidimensional structure to the data. We conclude that individual SF-36 domain scores are valid measures of HRQoL in TBI patients, but that the physical and mental component summaries should be interpreted with caution.

[1]  J. Hobart,et al.  Testing the SF-36 in Parkinson's disease , 2008, Journal of Neurology.

[2]  L. H. van den Berg,et al.  Cross-diagnostic validity of the SF-36 physical functioning scale in patients with stroke, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a study using Rasch analysis. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[3]  J. Hobart,et al.  Measuring Outcomes in Cervical Spine Surgery: Think Twice Before Using the SF-36 , 2006, Spine.

[4]  J. Hobart,et al.  Comparison of physician outcome measures and patients' perception of benefits of inpatient neurorehabilitation , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  J. Hobart,et al.  Quality of Life Measurement After Stroke: Uses and Abuses of the SF-36 , 2002, Stroke.

[6]  M. Swash,et al.  Use of the short form health survey (SF-36) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: tests of data quality, score reliability, response rate and scaling assumptions , 2002, Journal of Neurology.

[7]  A. Thompson,et al.  The SF-36 in multiple sclerosis: why basic assumptions must be tested , 2001, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[8]  T. Ashman,et al.  The reliability and validity of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire for use with individuals with traumatic brain injury. , 2001, Brain injury.

[9]  I J Higginson,et al.  Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  G. Teasdale,et al.  Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow outcome scale , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  A Bowling,et al.  Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.

[12]  G. Baker,et al.  The SF-36 as a health status measure for epilepsy: A psychometric assessment , 1999, Quality of Life Research.

[13]  J. Brazier,et al.  Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  P. Dorman,et al.  Doctors and patients don't agree: cross sectional study of patients' and doctors' perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis , 1997, BMJ.

[15]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. , 1994 .

[16]  M. Abdalla,et al.  The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? , 1993, BMJ.

[17]  C. McHorney,et al.  The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs , 1993, Medical care.

[18]  J. E. Brazier,et al.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.

[19]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[20]  H Rodgers,et al.  Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients? , 1998, Age and ageing.