Assessing quality of life after traumatic brain injury: examination of the short form 36 health survey.
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Menon | P. Hutchinson | H. Richards | M. Guilfoyle | H. Seeley | E. Corteen | C. Harkin
[1] J. Hobart,et al. Testing the SF-36 in Parkinson's disease , 2008, Journal of Neurology.
[2] L. H. van den Berg,et al. Cross-diagnostic validity of the SF-36 physical functioning scale in patients with stroke, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a study using Rasch analysis. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.
[3] J. Hobart,et al. Measuring Outcomes in Cervical Spine Surgery: Think Twice Before Using the SF-36 , 2006, Spine.
[4] J. Hobart,et al. Comparison of physician outcome measures and patients' perception of benefits of inpatient neurorehabilitation , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[5] J. Hobart,et al. Quality of Life Measurement After Stroke: Uses and Abuses of the SF-36 , 2002, Stroke.
[6] M. Swash,et al. Use of the short form health survey (SF-36) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: tests of data quality, score reliability, response rate and scaling assumptions , 2002, Journal of Neurology.
[7] A. Thompson,et al. The SF-36 in multiple sclerosis: why basic assumptions must be tested , 2001, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
[8] T. Ashman,et al. The reliability and validity of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire for use with individuals with traumatic brain injury. , 2001, Brain injury.
[9] I J Higginson,et al. Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[10] G. Teasdale,et al. Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow outcome scale , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.
[11] A Bowling,et al. Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.
[12] G. Baker,et al. The SF-36 as a health status measure for epilepsy: A psychometric assessment , 1999, Quality of Life Research.
[13] J. Brazier,et al. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[14] P. Dorman,et al. Doctors and patients don't agree: cross sectional study of patients' and doctors' perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis , 1997, BMJ.
[15] C. Sherbourne,et al. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. , 1994 .
[16] M. Abdalla,et al. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? , 1993, BMJ.
[17] C. McHorney,et al. The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs , 1993, Medical care.
[18] J. E. Brazier,et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.
[19] C. Sherbourne,et al. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .
[20] H Rodgers,et al. Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients? , 1998, Age and ageing.