Workplace Justice and Job Satisfaction As Predictors of Satisfaction with Union and Management

This research examined the extent to which workplace justice and job satisfaction predicted satisfaction with union and management. We defined workplace justice in terms of the procedural and distributive justice afforded by an organization's grievance system and, more generally, in terms of beliefs about a moral order in the workplace. Multivariate analyses were used to test a number of hypotheses about the relationships among measures of institutional satisfaction, job satisfaction, and workplace justice. The amounts of procedural and distributive justice afforded by a grievance system were the strongest predictors of satisfaction with a union, whereas belief in a moral order at a workplace was the strongest predictor of satisfaction with management. Justice in workplaces is an issue of substantial importance to workers, organized labor, and management. This study examined the extent to which workplace justice predicted satisfaction with union and management. We measured workplace justice both in terms of perceptions of the distributive and procedural justice afforded by a grievance system and in terms of beliefs about a moral order in a workplace. We also examined the relationships among various facets of job satisfaction and satisfaction with union and management.

[1]  R. Folger,et al.  Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions , 1989 .

[2]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Cultivating an Image of Justice: Looking Fair on the Job , 1988 .

[3]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  The Transformation of American Industrial Relations , 1988 .

[4]  D. Gallagher,et al.  Satisfaction with Union Representation , 1988 .

[5]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[6]  Paul E. Spector Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? , 1987 .

[7]  T. R. Knight The Role of the Duty of Fair Representation in Union Grievance Decisions , 1987 .

[8]  Laura L. Beauvais,et al.  The Job Satisfaction and Union Commitment of Unionized Engineers , 1984 .

[9]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  The Role of Perceived Injustice in Defendants' Evaluations of Their Courtroom Experience , 1984 .

[10]  J. Boudreau,et al.  Effects of unions on job satisfaction: The role of work-related values and perceived rewards , 1983 .

[11]  H. G. Heneman,et al.  Predicting the Outcome of Union Certification Elections: A Review of the Literature , 1983 .

[12]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  The Decertification Process: Evidence from California , 1982 .

[13]  James E. Martin Dual allegiance in public sector unionism: a case study , 1981 .

[14]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion , 1980 .

[15]  Shaffer Fa The decertification process. , 1980 .

[16]  M. Gordon,et al.  Commitment to the Union: Development of a Measure and an Examination of Its Correlates , 1980 .

[17]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[18]  L. Griffin,et al.  Causal Modeling of Psychological Success in Work Organizations , 1977 .

[19]  Z. Rubin,et al.  Belief in a Just World and Reactions to Another's Lot: A Study of Participants in the National Draft Lottery , 1973 .

[20]  Chester W. Harris,et al.  On factors and factor scores , 1967 .

[21]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  Understanding the union member , 1956 .

[22]  A Comparison of Management‐Labor Attitudes Toward Grievance Procedures , 1951 .

[23]  W. A. Kerr,et al.  An Experiment in Industrial Harmony1 , 1950 .

[24]  Phillips Bradley New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations , 1946 .