Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields

In visual search, items defined by a unique feature are found easily and efficiently. Search for a moving target among stationary distractors is one such efficient search. Search for a stationary target among moving distractors is markedly more difficult. In the experiments reported here, we confirm this finding and further show that searches for a stationary target within a structured flow field are more efficient than searches for stationary targets among distractors moving in random directions. The structured motion fields tested included uniform direction of motion, a radial flow field simulating observer forward motion, and a deformation flow field inconsistent with observer motion. The results using optic flow stimuli were not significantly different from the results obtained with other structured fields of distractors. The results suggest that the local properties of the flow fields rather than global optic flow properties are important for determining the efficiency of search for a stationary target.

[1]  P. McLeod,et al.  Motion coherence and conjunction search: Implications for guided search theory , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  D. Foster,et al.  Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  E Ruthruff,et al.  A test of the deadline model for speed-accuracy tradeoffs , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  A. Treisman.  Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Getting beyond the serial/parallel debate in visual search: a hybrid approach , 2001 .

[8]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Bravo,et al.  Preattentive Vision and Perceptual Groups , 1990, Perception.

[11]  G. Moraglia,et al.  Display organization and the detection of horizontal line segments , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  O. Braddick,et al.  Serial Search for Targets Defined by Divergence or Deformation of Optic Flow , 1991, Perception.

[13]  K. Shapiro.  The limits of attention : temporal constraints in human information processing , 2001 .

[14]  R. Rosenholtz.  Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  S. Yantis.  Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  R. Ivry,et al.  Asymmetry in visual search for targets defined by differences in movement speed. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[18]  J. Duncan.  Target and nontarget grouping in visual search , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[20]  J. Townsend.  Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[21]  S Ullman,et al.  Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. , 1987, Science.

[22]  U. Neisser.  VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[23]  G K Humphrey,et al.  Parallel discrimination of subjective contours defined by offset gratings , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[25]  T. Takeuchi,et al.  Visual search of expansion and contraction , 1997, Vision Research.

[26]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Differential effects of shared attention on perception of heading and 3-D object motion , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  W C Gogel,et al.  Induced Motion as a Function of the Speed of the Inducing Object, Measured by Means of Two Methods , 1979, Perception.

[28]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[29]  W. D. Ross,et al.  A Neural Theory of Attentive Visual Search : Interactions of Boundary , Surface , Spatial , and Object Representations By : Stephen Grossberg , 2004 .

[30]  D. Pelli,et al.  The information capacity of visual attention , 1992, Vision Research.

[31]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[32]  Michael Grünau,et al.  Visual search asymmetry for viewing direction , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  H. Nothdurft.  The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues , 1993, Vision Research.