Integrating ecosystem service bundles and socio-environmental conditions – A national scale analysis from Germany

Abstract Understanding the relationship and spatial distribution of multiple ecosystem services (ES) in the context of underlying socio-environmental conditions is an essential element of national ecosystem assessments. Here, we use Germany as an example to present a reproducible blueprint approach for mapping and analysing ecosystem service bundles (ESB) and associated socio-environmental gradients. We synthesized spatial indicators of eleven provisioning, regulating and cultural ES in Germany and used the method of self-organizing maps (SOM) to define and map ESBs. Likewise, we collated data from 18 covariates to delineate socio-environmental clusters (SEC). Finally, we used an overlap analysis to characterise the relationship between the spatial configuration of ESBs and co-occurring SECs. We identified and mapped eight types of ESBs that were characterized to varying degrees by provisioning, cultural and regulating/maintenance services. While ESBs dominated by provisioning ES were linked to regions with distinct environmental characteristics, cultural ESBs were associated with areas where environmental and socio-economic gradients had similar importance. Furthermore, spatial stratification of ESBs indicated hot spots where more detailed analysis is needed within national assessments. Our approach can serve as a blueprint for ESB analysis that can be reproduced in other geographical and environmental settings.

[1]  P. Verburg,et al.  Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: Demand and supply of pollination in the European Union , 2014 .

[2]  A. M. Kalteh,et al.  Review of the self-organizing map (SOM) approach in water resources: Analysis, modelling and application , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  M. Antrop Why landscapes of the past are important for the future , 2005 .

[4]  A. Meiner,et al.  An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 , 2016 .

[5]  Linda O. Mearns,et al.  The Practitioner's Dilemma: How to Assess the Credibility of Downscaled Climate Projections , 2013 .

[6]  José I. Barredo,et al.  Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services - An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 , 2013 .

[7]  Pragya Agarwal,et al.  Introduction: What is a Self‐Organizing Map? , 2008 .

[8]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape , 2015, AMBIO.

[9]  B. Hewitson,et al.  Climate downscaling: techniques and application , 1996 .

[10]  Donald W. Bouldin,et al.  A Cluster Separation Measure , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  H. Schreier,et al.  Linking Water Quality with Agricultural Intensification in a Rural Watershed , 2001 .

[12]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe , 2012 .

[13]  T. Koellner,et al.  Towards a national set of ecosystem service indicators: insights from Germany. , 2016 .

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  E. Bennett,et al.  Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Fabrice DeClerck,et al.  Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[17]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services: The supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe , 2014 .

[18]  Berta Martín-López,et al.  An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services , 2014 .

[19]  Francis Turkelboom,et al.  Assessing bundles of ecosystem services from regional to landscape scale: insights from the French Alps , 2015 .

[20]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape , 2014 .

[21]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  National ecosystem services mapping at multiple scales – The German exemplar , 2016 .

[22]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[24]  Sovan Lek,et al.  A comparison of self-organizing map algorithm and some conventional statistical methods for ecological community ordination , 2001 .

[25]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Archetypical patterns and trajectories of land systems in Europe , 2018, Regional Environmental Change.

[26]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Uncertainty of Monetary Valued Ecosystem Services – Value Transfer Functions for Global Mapping , 2016, PloS one.

[27]  Stefan Marzelli,et al.  Die Erfassung von Ökosystemleistungen: Erste Schritte für eine Nutzung des Konzepts auf nationaler Ebene für Deutschland , 2014 .

[28]  Lutgarde M. C. Buydens,et al.  Self- and Super-organizing Maps in R: The kohonen Package , 2007 .

[29]  E. Oteros‐Rozas,et al.  Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level , 2013 .

[30]  S. Lautenbach,et al.  A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services , 2014, bioRxiv.

[31]  Karin Naumann,et al.  Monitoring zur Wirkung des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz (EEG) auf die Entwicklung der Stromerzeugung aus Biomasse , 2012 .

[32]  Claire Brown,et al.  National Ecosystem Assessments in Europe: A Review , 2016, Bioscience.

[33]  Grizzetti Bruna,et al.  Nutrient Discharge from Rivers to Seas for Year 2000 , 2009 .

[34]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Assessing nitrogen pressures on European surface water , 2008 .

[35]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[36]  Pete Smith,et al.  UK National Ecosystem Assessment:Technical report , 2011 .

[37]  R. Valbuena,et al.  Mapping wood production in European forests , 2015 .

[38]  G. Marsily,et al.  A statistical method for source apportionment of riverine nitrogen loads , 2003 .

[39]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance , 2013 .

[40]  S. Lek,et al.  Applications of artificial neural networks for patterning and predicting aquatic insect species richness in running waters , 2003 .

[41]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Mapping global land system archetypes , 2013 .