Spatial variability of the effect of air pollution on term birth weight: evaluating influential factors using Bayesian hierarchical models

BackgroundEpidemiological studies suggest that air pollution is adversely associated with pregnancy outcomes. Such associations may be modified by spatially-varying factors including socio-demographic characteristics, land-use patterns and unaccounted exposures. Yet, few studies have systematically investigated the impact of these factors on spatial variability of the air pollution’s effects. This study aimed to examine spatial variability of the effects of air pollution on term birth weight across Census tracts and the influence of tract-level factors on such variability.MethodsWe obtained over 900,000 birth records from 2001 to 2008 in Los Angeles County, California, USA. Air pollution exposure was modeled at individual level for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) using spatiotemporal models. Two-stage Bayesian hierarchical non-linear models were developed to (1) quantify the associations between air pollution exposure and term birth weight within each tract; and (2) examine the socio-demographic, land-use, and exposure-related factors contributing to the between-tract variability of the associations between air pollution and term birth weight.ResultsHigher air pollution exposure was associated with lower term birth weight (average posterior effects: −14.7 (95 % CI: −19.8, −9.7) g per 10 ppb increment in NO2 and −6.9 (95 % CI: −12.9, −0.9) g per 10 ppb increment in NOx). The variation of the association across Census tracts was significantly influenced by the tract-level socio-demographic, exposure-related and land-use factors. Our models captured the complex non-linear relationship between these factors and the associations between air pollution and term birth weight: we observed the thresholds from which the influence of the tract-level factors was markedly exacerbated or attenuated. Exacerbating factors might reflect additional exposure to environmental insults or lower socio-economic status with higher vulnerability, whereas attenuating factors might indicate reduced exposure or higher socioeconomic status with lower vulnerability.ConclusionsOur Bayesian models effectively combined a priori knowledge with training data to infer the posterior association of air pollution with term birth weight and to evaluate the influence of the tract-level factors on spatial variability of such association. This study contributes new findings about non-linear influences of socio-demographic factors, land-use patterns, and unaccounted exposures on spatial variability of the effects of air pollution.

[1]  D. S. Wilkinson,et al.  Impact of perceived stress, major life events and pregnancy attitudes on low birth weight. , 2000, Family planning perspectives.

[2]  C. Dormann Response to Comment on “Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review” , 2009 .

[3]  Bradley D Schultz,et al.  Assessing the impact of race, social factors and air pollution on birth outcomes: a population-based study , 2014, Environmental Health.

[4]  G. Ghilagaber,et al.  Advanced techniques for modelling maternal and child health in Africa , 2014 .

[5]  Gang Lu,et al.  Evaluating Multipollutant Exposure and Urban Air Quality: Pollutant Interrelationships, Neighborhood Variability, and Nitrogen Dioxide as a Proxy Pollutant , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  R. Agius,et al.  Maternal residential proximity to sources of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and adverse birth outcomes in a UK cohort , 2014, Bioelectromagnetics.

[7]  R. Slama,et al.  Maternal exposure to nitrogen dioxide during pregnancy and offspring birth weight: comparison of two exposure models. , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[9]  J. Schwartz,et al.  The effects of socioeconomic status and indices of physical environment on reduced birth weight and preterm births in Eastern Massachusetts , 2008, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[10]  Catherine A. Calder,et al.  Beyond Moran's I: Testing for Spatial Dependence Based on the Spatial Autoregressive Model , 2007 .

[11]  A. Tardón,et al.  Indoor Air Pollution From Gas Cooking and Infant Neurodevelopment , 2012, Epidemiology.

[12]  Daniel Wartenberg,et al.  Maternal Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution and Term Birth Weight: A Multi-Country Evaluation of Effect and Heterogeneity , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  C. Milesi,et al.  Green spaces and pregnancy outcomes in Southern California. , 2013, Health & place.

[14]  T. Woodruff,et al.  Influences of study design and location on the relationship between particulate matter air pollution and birthweight. , 2008, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[15]  J. Currie,et al.  Air Pollution and Infant Health: What Can We Learn from California's Recent Experience? , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  R. Khalil,et al.  Vascular and cellular calcium in normal and hypertensive pregnancy. , 2009, Current clinical pharmacology.

[17]  R. Morello-Frosch,et al.  Ambient air pollution exposure and full-term birth weight in California , 2010, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[18]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data : a review , 2007 .

[19]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Generalized Additive Models , 1986 .

[20]  Matthew J. Strickland,et al.  Ambient Air Pollution and Birth Weight in Full-Term Infants in Atlanta, 1994–2004 , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[21]  Payam Dadvand,et al.  Green space, health inequality and pregnancy. , 2012, Environment international.

[22]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. , 1994 .

[23]  A. Getis The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics , 2010 .

[24]  H. Suen,et al.  Assessing the impact of the local environment on birth outcomes: a case for HLM , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[25]  Lianfa Li,et al.  Investigating the association between birth weight and complementary air pollution metrics: a cohort study , 2013, Environmental Health.

[26]  M. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Association between GIS-Based Exposure to Urban Air Pollution during Pregnancy and Birth Weight in the INMA Sabadell Cohort , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[27]  K. Pickett,et al.  Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[28]  Teri A. Crosby,et al.  How to Detect and Handle Outliers , 1993 .

[29]  O. Kallenberg Foundations of Modern Probability , 2021, Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling.

[30]  Robert Haining,et al.  Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .

[31]  Beate Ritz,et al.  Estimating Spatiotemporal Variability of Ambient Air Pollutant Concentrations with A Hierarchical Model. , 2013, Atmospheric environment.

[32]  M. Clyde,et al.  Health Effects of Air Pollution: A Statistical Review , 2003 .

[33]  Michelle L. Bell,et al.  Ambient Air Pollution and Low Birth Weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[34]  Lianfa Li,et al.  Sources and contents of air pollution affecting term low birth weight in Los Angeles County, California, 2001-2008. , 2014, Environmental research.

[35]  David M Stieb,et al.  Ambient air pollution, birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Environmental research.

[36]  W. Nicole Cooking Up Indoor Air Pollution: Emissions from Natural Gas Stoves , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[37]  Brian K. Lee,et al.  Residential proximity to electromagnetic field sources and birth weight: Minimizing residual confounding using multiple imputation and propensity score matching. , 2014, Environment international.

[38]  Joshua Millstein,et al.  Birth Outcomes and Prenatal Exposure to Ozone, Carbon Monoxide, and Particulate Matter: Results from the Children’s Health Study , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[39]  S. Richardson,et al.  Bayesian graphical models for regression on multiple data sets with different variables , 2008, Biostatistics.

[40]  M. Bonzini,et al.  Impact of ambient air pollution on birth outcomes: systematic review of the current evidences. , 2010, La Medicina del lavoro.

[41]  Lianfa Li,et al.  Modeling personal particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (pb-pah) exposure in human subjects in Southern California , 2012, Environmental Health.

[42]  Andreas Brezger,et al.  Generalized structured additive regression based on Bayesian P-splines , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[43]  Geoffrey H. Donovan,et al.  Urban trees and the risk of poor birth outcomes. , 2011, Health & place.

[44]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-duty diesel traffic , 2002 .

[45]  Elena Paoletti,et al.  Air quality impact of an urban park over time , 2011 .

[46]  Martyn Plummer,et al.  JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling , 2003 .

[47]  M. Klein,et al.  The issue of confounding in epidemiological studies of ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[48]  L. Fahrmeir,et al.  Bayesian inference for generalized additive mixed models based on Markov random field priors , 2001 .

[49]  J. Hammitt,et al.  Major Factors Influencing the Health Impacts from Controlling Air Pollutants with Nonlinear Chemistry: An Application to China , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[50]  David Ebdon,et al.  Statistics in geography: A practical approach , 1977 .

[51]  P. Rhodes Administration. , 1933, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[52]  Paul B English,et al.  Changes in the spatial pattern of low birth weight in a southern California county: the role of individual and neighborhood level factors. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[53]  N. Gouveia,et al.  Association between ambient air pollution and birth weight in São Paulo, Brazil , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[54]  B. Brunekreef,et al.  Ambient air pollution exposure, residential mobility and term birth weight in Oslo, Norway. , 2010, Environmental research.

[55]  L. Balluz,et al.  Geographic Variation in the Association between Ambient Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) and Term Low Birth Weight in the United States , 2015, Environmental health perspectives.

[56]  F. Lurmann,et al.  Exposure to traffic-related air pollution during pregnancy and term low birth weight: estimation of causal associations in a semiparametric model. , 2012, American journal of epidemiology.

[57]  B. Ritz,et al.  Modeling spatial effects of PM(2.5) on term low birth weight in Los Angeles County. , 2015, Environmental research.

[58]  Martin Bobak,et al.  Ambient Air Pollution and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Review of the Literature , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[59]  A. Correa,et al.  Relation between ambient air pollution and low birth weight in the Northeastern United States. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[60]  Z. Q. John Lu,et al.  Bayesian methods for data analysis, third edition , 2010 .

[61]  Kazuhiko Ito,et al.  Ambient fine particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and term birth weight in New York, New York. , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.

[62]  P. Shah,et al.  Air pollution and birth outcomes: a systematic review. , 2011, Environment international.

[63]  J Schwartz,et al.  Is Air Pollution a Risk Factor for Low Birth Weight in Seoul? , 2001, Epidemiology.

[64]  Lianfa Li,et al.  A spatial model to predict the incidence of neural tube defects , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[65]  M. Brauer,et al.  The International Collaboration on Air Pollution and Pregnancy Outcomes: Initial Results , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[66]  C. Hansen,et al.  Maternal exposure to low levels of ambient air pollution and preterm birth in Brisbane, Australia , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[67]  Jennifer M. Logue,et al.  Pollutant Exposures from Natural Gas Cooking Burners: A Simulation-Based Assessment for Southern California , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[68]  M Bobak,et al.  Pregnancy outcomes and outdoor air pollution: an ecological study in districts of the Czech Republic 1986-8. , 1999, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[69]  S. Cummins,et al.  Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[70]  Nectarios Rose,et al.  Validation of a spatiotemporal land use regression model incorporating fixed site monitors. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[71]  Lianne Sheppard,et al.  Health effects of air pollution , 2003 .

[72]  Barbara Heude,et al.  Ambient air pollution and low birthweight: a European cohort study (ESCAPE). , 2013, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[73]  M. Bell,et al.  Ambient air pollution and term birth weight in Texas from 1998 to 2004 , 2012, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[74]  Johan Lindström,et al.  Comparing universal kriging and land-use regression for predicting concentrations of gaseous oxides of nitrogen (NOx) for the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air). , 2011, Atmospheric environment.

[75]  M. Röösli,et al.  Air pollution during pregnancy and neonatal outcome: a review. , 2013, Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery.