Effects of column and superstructure stiffness on the seismic response of bridges in the transverse direction1

The transverse seismic responses of continuous 4-span bridges designed based on the 2006 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code were studied using inelastic time history analyses. A total of 648 bridge configurations were considered in which the column heights, column diameters, superstructure stiffness and mass as well as abutment restraint conditions were studied. The maximum ductility demands obtained using elastic and inelastic analyses were compared to study the influence of the degree of irregularity. The effects of column stiffness ratios and superstructure to substructure stiffness ratios on the maximum ductility demands and concentration of ductility demands were investigated. A number of different regularity indices were compared to determine the suitability of these different indices in predicting the influence of irregularity. This study demonstrates the conservative nature of the 2006 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code and provides some guidance on factors for determining the degree of irregula...

[1]  Ahmad M. Itani,et al.  Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Bridges with Unconventional Configurations , 2001 .

[2]  Frederic Legeron,et al.  Confinement Reinforcement Design for Reinforced Concrete Columns , 2008 .

[3]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[4]  Susan Dowty,et al.  Seismic Design Criteria , 2011 .

[5]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Implementation of Inelastic Displacement Patterns in Direct Displacement-Based Design of Continuous Bridge Structures , 2006 .

[6]  Reza Akbari,et al.  The effect of higher modes on the regularity of single-column-bent highway viaducts , 2009 .

[7]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Analysis of the failure of interstate 10 freeway ramp during the Northridge earthquake of 17 January 1994 , 1995 .

[8]  Wai-Fah Chen,et al.  Bridge Engineering Handbook , 1999 .

[9]  Bryan E. Little,et al.  American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Drainage Guidelines American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications , 2000 .

[10]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges , 1996 .

[11]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Performance of bridges in the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1995 .

[12]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic response of bridges and recommendations for code provisions , 1996 .

[13]  Tatjana Isaković,et al.  Applicability of pushover methods for the seismic analysis of single‐column bent viaducts , 2008 .

[14]  Tatjana Isaković,et al.  Higher modes in simplified inelastic seismic analysis of single column bent viaducts , 2006 .

[15]  TehraniPayam,et al.  Effects of column stiffness irregularity on the seismic response of bridges in the longitudinal direction1 , 2013 .

[16]  Tatjana Isaković,et al.  Inelastic Seismic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Viaducts , 2003 .