Advantages and Disadvantages of Resting State Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Applications

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is a powerful non-invasive technique for imaging BOLD (Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent) signal changes that is due to changes in brain hemodynamics responses associated to local neuronal activity to identify activated brain regions [1,2]. This technique allows researchers in laboratory environment to investigate the BOLD signals to determine the activated brain reigns for different stimuli or the processing of various cognitive tasks [3,4]. Furthermore, fMRI can be used in clinical applications to determine the brain abnormalities in population of subjects with neurological disease. Our knowledge about brain functions comes from task-state studies in the presence of external stimuli that the neural activity and subject responses are measured for analysis. However, the brain is very active in resting-state without any stimuli. Recent findings that have been proven very valuable in the clinical area of fMRI applications, involves investigation of brain fluctuations at resting condition and their results demonstrate that spontaneous modulation of the BOLD does not produce randomly. Spontaneous modulations in BOLD signal are structured in spatial patterns that make correlated networks between various brain regions. The analysis of brain fluctuations in BOLD signal usually involves spatial patterns of correlated activity across regions of interests that are known as resting state connectivity networks. After data acquisition and preprocessing [5], there are two important data analysis techniques for studying the resting state functional connectivity: seed-based correlations approaches that are based on calculating the correlation between extracted regions of interests to identify spatial pattern of spontaneous activity and ICA (Independent Component Analyses)-based approaches that use all brain voxels activity to separate brain functional networks that are correlated with spontaneous component of BOLD signal (to account for non-neural noise with considering maximally independent spontaneous BOLD fluctuations) [4,6-8]. Functional connectivity approaches are divided into resting state and task state studies [4,9,10].

[1]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Fahmeed Hyder,et al.  Energetic basis of brain activity: implications for neuroimaging , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  Mohammad Reza Daliri,et al.  fMRI: Clinical and Research Applications , 2013 .

[5]  H. Boyaci,et al.  Statistical Analysis Methods for the fMRI Data , 2011 .

[6]  P. Sebel,et al.  Functional connectivity changes with concentration of sevoflurane anesthesia , 2005, Neuroreport.

[7]  N. Logothetis The Underpinnings of the BOLD Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  Mohammad Reza Daliri,et al.  Software Tools for the Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012 .

[10]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  The chronoarchitecture of the human brain—natural viewing conditions reveal a time-based anatomy of the brain , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  S. Laughlin,et al.  An Energy Budget for Signaling in the Grey Matter of the Brain , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[12]  Roel H. R. Deckers,et al.  Large-amplitude, spatially correlated fluctuations in BOLD fMRI signals during extended rest and early sleep stages. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain , 2007, Nature.

[14]  Mohammad Reza Daliri,et al.  Predicting the Cognitive States of the Subjects in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signals Using the Combination of Feature Selection Strategies , 2011, Brain Topography.

[15]  P. Lennie The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[16]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Mintun,et al.  Brain work and brain imaging. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Adelbert Ames,et al.  CNS energy metabolism as related to function , 2000, Brain Research Reviews.

[19]  John C Gore,et al.  Assessing functional connectivity in the human brain by fMRI. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior , 2007, Neuron.

[21]  M. Fox,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[22]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of nondeterministic fMRI signal sources , 2003, NeuroImage.