Correcting for Acquiescent Response Bias in the Absence of a Balanced Scale

This article describes a method for purging data of the effects of acquiescent response bias—a tendency to respond in the affirmative to survey items irrespective of substantive content—in the absence of a balanced scale (a scale with an equal number of positively worded and negatively worded items). The method is relevant in situations where the scale of interest is not balanced but where items similar in form from another content area are available to help identify acquiescence; it is illustrated here using data on class consciousness. Structural equation modeling techniques are used to extract a factor that captures the covariation among the items that is due to acquiescence. A series of models is presented illustrating the procedure on data from the Comparative Project on Class Structure and Class Consciousness for the United States. The model is then cross-validated on samples from Canada, Norway, and Sweden.

[1]  M. Jackman Education and prejudice or education and response-set? , 1973, American sociological review.

[2]  M. Mcclendon,et al.  Acquiescence and Recency Response-Order Effects in Interview Surveys , 1991 .

[3]  G. Moran,et al.  Double agreement as a function of item ambiguity and susceptibility to demand implications of the psychological situation. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  D. Peabody Authoritarianism Scales And Response Bias , 1966 .

[5]  J. Ray Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. , 1983 .

[6]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  SPECIFICATION SEARCHES IN COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELING , 1986 .

[7]  J. Ray Is the acquiescent response style problem not so mythical after all? Some results from a successful balanced F scale. , 1979, Journal of personality assessment.

[8]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response Styles , 1984 .

[9]  M. Browne Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[10]  D. Peabody,et al.  Attitude content and agreement set in scales of authoritarianism, dogmatism, anti-semitism, and economic conservatism. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[11]  B. Byrne,et al.  Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. , 1989 .

[12]  Leonard G. Rorer THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH. , 1965 .

[13]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Methodology Review: Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices , 1986 .

[14]  Catherine E. Ross,et al.  Eliminating defense and agreement bias from measures of the sense of control : A 2×2 index , 1991 .