New findings on primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: do all roads lead to RAS?

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy with the monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab is the main targeted treatment to combine with standard chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Many clinical studies have shown the benefit of the addition of these agents for patients without mutations in the EGFR pathway. Many biomarkers, including KRAS and NRAS mutations, BRAF mutations, PIK3CA mutations, PTEN loss, AREG and EREG expression, and HER-2 amplification have already been identified to select responders to anti-EGFR agents. Among these alterations KRAS and NRAS mutations are currently recognized as the best predictive factors for primary resistance. Liquid biopsy, which helps to isolate circulating tumor DNA, is an innovative method to study both primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. However, high-sensitivity techniques should be used to enable the identification of a wide set of gene mutations related to resistance.

[1]  G. Milano,et al.  The relevance of ADCC for EGFR targeting: A review of the literature and a clinically-applicable method of assessment in patients. , 2015, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[2]  A. Russo,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of non-haematological tumours: update of an expanding scenario , 2015, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[3]  M. Wiese,et al.  Extended RAS mutations and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  Ivo D. Shterev,et al.  Gene Expression Markers of Efficacy and Resistance to Cetuximab Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results from CALGB 80203 (Alliance) , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  P. Pauwels,et al.  Liquid biopsies in lung cancer: the new ambrosia of researchers. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  C. Boni,et al.  Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Russo,et al.  The role of targeted therapy for gastrointestinal tumors , 2014, Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[8]  Y. Wu,et al.  Circulating cell-free DNA in serum as a biomarker for diagnosis and prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  A. Bass,et al.  Managing advanced colorectal cancer: have we reached the PEAK with current therapies? , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Hecht,et al.  PEAK: a randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  Bert Vogelstein,et al.  DETECTION OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA IN EARLY AND LATE STAGE HUMAN MALIGNANCIES , 2014 .

[13]  Mef Nilbert,et al.  The predictive value of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN for anti-EGFR treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Acta oncologica.

[14]  R. Schilsky,et al.  CALGB/SWOG 80405: Phase III trial of irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) with bevacizumab (BV) or cetuximab (CET) for patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (wt) untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC). , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  A. Bardelli,et al.  TGFα and Amphiregulin Paracrine Network Promotes Resistance to EGFR Blockade in Colorectal Cancer Cells , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  J. Barrett,et al.  Combined epiregulin (EREG) and amphiregulin (AREG) expression levels as a biomarker of prognosis and panitumumab benefit in RAS-wt advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). , 2014 .

[17]  F. Lordick,et al.  Updated analysis of KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in study 20050181 of panitumumab (pmab) plus FOLFIRI for second-line treatment (tx) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). , 2014 .

[18]  S. Serrano,et al.  Evolution of heterogeneous mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab-based therapy in colorectal cancer. , 2014 .

[19]  G. Fontanini,et al.  Subgroup analyses in RAS mutant, BRAF mutant and all-wt mCRC pts treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) or FOLFIRI plus bev in the TRIBE study. , 2014 .

[20]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Treatment outcome according to tumor RAS mutation status in OPUS study patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) randomized to FOLFOX4 with/without cetuximab. , 2014 .

[21]  A. Russo,et al.  How to find the Ariadne's thread in the labyrinth of salvage treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer? , 2014, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[22]  F. Ciardiello,et al.  Primary and Acquired Resistance of Colorectal Cancer Cells to Anti-EGFR Antibodies Converge on MEK/ERK Pathway Activation and Can Be Overcome by Combined MEK/EGFR Inhibition , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  S. Yuan,et al.  KRAS mutations: analytical considerations. , 2014, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[24]  Z. Mo,et al.  Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody-based therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the effect of PIK3CA mutations in KRAS wild-type patients , 2014, Archives of medical science : AMS.

[25]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Blockade of EGFR and MEK Intercepts Heterogeneous Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to Anti-EGFR Therapies in Colorectal Cancer , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[26]  M. Tzardi,et al.  BRAFV600E Mutation Analysis in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in Daily Clinical Practice: Correlations with Clinical Characteristics, and Its Impact on Patients’ Outcome , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  A. Russo,et al.  Effects of anti-miR-182 on TSP-1 expression in human colon cancer cells: there is a sense in antisense? , 2013, Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.

[28]  Zuyao Yang,et al.  Promising biomarkers for predicting the outcomes of patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies: A systematic review with meta‐analysis , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[29]  F. Ciardiello,et al.  Increased TGF-α as a Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to the Anti-EGFR Inhibitor Cetuximab through EGFR–MET Interaction and Activation of MET Signaling in Colon Cancer Cells , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[30]  G. Botti,et al.  The S492R EGFR ectodomain mutation is never detected in KRAS wild-type colorectal carcinoma before exposure to EGFR monoclonal antibodies , 2013, Cancer biology & therapy.

[31]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  KRAS gene amplification in colorectal cancer and impact on response to EGFR‐targeted therapy , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[33]  A. Russo,et al.  Dilemma in metastatic colorectal cancer: VEGF versus EGRF targeting , 2013, Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.

[34]  Susan Richman,et al.  Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[35]  D. Lambrechts,et al.  Somatic Profiling of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway in Tumors from Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy ± Cetuximab , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[36]  Andrea Bertotti,et al.  Amplification of the MET receptor drives resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[37]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer Genome Landscapes , 2013, Science.

[38]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  HER2 gene copy number status may influence clinical efficacy to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer patients , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[39]  C. Cybulski,et al.  KRAS mutation testing in colorectal cancer as an example of the pathologist's role in personalized targeted therapy: a practical approach. , 2012, Polish journal of pathology : official journal of the Polish Society of Pathologists.

[40]  R. Lieberman Food and Drug Administration approval of cetuximab and a new KRAS genetic test for metastatic colorectal cancer: major advance but just the tip of the biomarker iceberg. , 2012, American journal of therapeutics.

[41]  A. Russo,et al.  MicroRNAs in colorectal cancer stem cells: new regulators of cancer stemness? , 2012, Oncogenesis.

[42]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Association of KRAS G13D tumor mutations with outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy with or without cetuximab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  A. Russo,et al.  Cetuximab rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: how to come away from acquired resistance? , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[44]  V. Heinemann,et al.  The influence of KRAS and BRAF mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab‐based first‐line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer: An analysis of the AIO KRK‐0104‐trial , 2012, International journal of cancer.

[45]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Intrapatient cetuximab dose escalation in metastatic colorectal cancer according to the grade of early skin reactions: the randomized EVEREST study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[47]  Enzo Medico,et al.  Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer , 2012, Nature.

[48]  Johannes G. Reiter,et al.  The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers , 2012, Nature.

[49]  H. Sorbye,et al.  Phase III trial of cetuximab with continuous or intermittent fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) versus FLOX alone in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NORDIC-VII study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[50]  F. Bosch,et al.  Identification of a mutation in the extracellular domain of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor conferring cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[51]  M. Caraglia,et al.  Predicting efficacy and toxicity in the era of targeted therapy: focus on anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF molecules. , 2011, Current drug metabolism.

[52]  Davide Corà,et al.  A molecularly annotated platform of patient-derived xenografts ("xenopatients") identifies HER2 as an effective therapeutic target in cetuximab-resistant colorectal cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[53]  P. Jänne,et al.  Activation of ERBB2 Signaling Causes Resistance to the EGFR-Directed Therapeutic Antibody Cetuximab , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[54]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[55]  S. Anderson Laboratory methods for KRAS mutation analysis , 2011, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[56]  R. Ferris,et al.  Natural killer (NK):dendritic cell (DC) cross talk induced by therapeutic monoclonal antibody triggers tumor antigen-specific T cell immunity , 2011, Immunologic research.

[57]  D. Lambrechts,et al.  Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[58]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[59]  T. Trikalinos,et al.  Systematic Review: Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Treatment Effect Modification by KRAS Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[60]  C. Ficorella,et al.  EGFR genomic alterations in cancer: prognostic and predictive values. , 2011, Frontiers in bioscience.

[61]  A. Russo,et al.  Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer: is KRAS and BRAF wild type status required for anti-EGFR therapy? , 2010, Cancer treatment reviews.

[62]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Association of KRAS p.G13D mutation with outcome in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2010, JAMA.

[63]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[64]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  Markers for EGFR pathway activation as predictor of outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with or without cetuximab. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[65]  M. Marra,et al.  Cytotoxic drugs up-regulate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in colon cancer cells and enhance their susceptibility to EGFR-targeted antibody-dependent cell-mediated-cytotoxicity (ADCC). , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[66]  F. Lévi,et al.  Acquired KRAS mutations during progression of colorectal cancer metastases: possible implications for therapy and prognosis , 2010, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[67]  F. J. Ramos,et al.  Pharmacogenomic and pharmacoproteomic studies of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: biomarker analysis of a phase I dose-escalation study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[68]  Comparison of two different screening methods for the KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer. , 2010, Clinical laboratory.

[69]  A. Russo,et al.  The Long and Winding Road to Useful Predictive Factors for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma: The KRAS/BRAF Pathway , 2010, Oncology.

[70]  J. Barrett,et al.  KRAS and BRAF mutations in advanced colorectal cancer are associated with poor prognosis but do not preclude benefit from oxaliplatin or irinotecan: results from the MRC FOCUS trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[71]  J. Reid,et al.  Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[72]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[73]  Linda Mol,et al.  Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[74]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Nuclear EGFR contributes to acquired resistance to cetuximab , 2009, Oncogene.

[75]  J. Vandesompele,et al.  Amphiregulin and epiregulin mRNA expression in primary tumors predicts outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[76]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Biomarkers Predicting Clinical Outcome of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[77]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Multi-Determinants Analysis of Molecular Alterations for Predicting Clinical Benefit to EGFR-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies in Colorectal Cancer , 2009, PloS one.

[78]  N. Funel,et al.  PTEN expression and KRAS mutations on primary tumors and metastases in the prediction of benefit from cetuximab plus irinotecan for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[79]  D. Lambrechts,et al.  PIK3CA Mutations Are Not a Major Determinant of Resistance to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[80]  D. Hedley,et al.  Heterogeneity and power in clinical biomarker studies. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[81]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Differing deregulation of EGFR and downstream proteins in primary colorectal cancer and related metastatic sites may be clinically relevant , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[82]  P. Harari,et al.  Establishment and Characterization of a Model of Acquired Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeting Agents in Human Cancer Cells , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[83]  Francesca Molinari,et al.  PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with clinical resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. , 2009, Cancer research.

[84]  Seta Shahin,et al.  A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[85]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[86]  I. Floriani,et al.  High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice. , 2008, The oncologist.

[87]  Dongsheng Tu,et al.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[88]  Shuji Ogino,et al.  CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability, BRAF mutation and clinical outcome in colon cancer , 2008, Gut.

[89]  S. Veronese,et al.  Mutations of KRAS and BRAF in primary and matched metastatic sites of colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[90]  A. Ryan,et al.  Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 Contributes to Resistance to Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Drugs in Human Cancer Cells , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[91]  P. Parren,et al.  Complement-dependent tumor cell lysis triggered by combinations of epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. , 2008, Cancer research.

[92]  S. Leung,et al.  Persistent Aberrations in Circulating DNA Integrity after Radiotherapy Are Associated with Poor Prognosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[93]  P. Harari,et al.  Mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab: role of HER (ErbB) family members , 2008, Oncogene.

[94]  Daniel J. Freeman,et al.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[95]  P. Keegan,et al.  U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval: Panitumumab for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Expressing Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma with Progression Following Fluoropyrimidine-, Oxaliplatin-, and Irinotecan-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[96]  Carlos L Arteaga,et al.  Human Breast Cancer Cells Selected for Resistance to Trastuzumab In vivo Overexpress Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and ErbB Ligands and Remain Dependent on the ErbB Receptor Network , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[97]  G. Yoo,et al.  Breast cancer expressing the activated HER2/neu is sensitive to gefitinib in vitro and in vivo and acquires resistance through a novel point mutation in the HER2/neu. , 2007, Cancer research.

[98]  Manuel Hidalgo,et al.  Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[99]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Multicenter phase II and translational study of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal carcinoma refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[100]  R. Schilsky,et al.  Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) ± cetuximab for patients (pts) with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC): CALGB 80203 preliminary results. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[101]  H. Reber,et al.  Increased integrity of free circulating DNA in sera of patients with colorectal or periampullary cancer: direct quantitative PCR for ALU repeats. , 2006, Clinical chemistry.

[102]  Tak W. Mak,et al.  Beyond PTEN mutations: the PI3K pathway as an integrator of multiple inputs during tumorigenesis , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[103]  H. Lane,et al.  ERBB Receptors and Cancer: The Complexity of Targeted Inhibitors , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[104]  D. Hedley,et al.  Raf kinase as a target for anticancer therapeutics , 2005, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[105]  Armando Santoro,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[106]  D. Hoon,et al.  Circulating nucleic acids in plasma and serum: past, present and future. , 2004, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[107]  K. Fransén,et al.  Mutation analysis of the BRAF, ARAF and RAF-1 genes in human colorectal adenocarcinomas. , 2003, Carcinogenesis.

[108]  T. Kawabe,et al.  Functional analysis of mutations within the kinase activation segment of B-Raf in human colorectal tumors. , 2003, Cancer research.

[109]  C. Sawyers,et al.  The phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase–AKT pathway in human cancer , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[110]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer , 2002, Nature.

[111]  F T Bosman,et al.  Intratumor genetic heterogeneity in advanced human colorectal adenocarcinoma , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[112]  F. O. Fackelmayer,et al.  DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. , 2001, Cancer research.

[113]  T. Liloglou,et al.  K-ras point mutation detection in lung cancer: comparison of two approaches to somatic mutation detection using ARMS allele-specific amplification. , 2000, Clinical chemistry.

[114]  N. Thelwell,et al.  Mode of action and application of Scorpion primers to mutation detection. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[115]  D. Stolz,et al.  Cross-talk between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and c-Met Signal Pathways in Transformed Cells* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[116]  K. Iczkowski,et al.  Cell-free DNA in human blood plasma: length measurements in patients with pancreatic cancer and healthy controls. , 1998, Pancreas.

[117]  J. Schlom,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies in gastrointestinal cancers. , 1988, Seminars in oncology.