Transcranial stimulation and cognition.

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a unique method for studying cognitive function. For the study of cognition, NIBS has gained popularity as a complementary method to functional neuroimaging. By bypassing the correlative approaches of standard imaging techniques, it is possible to establish a putative relationship between brain cognition. In fact, functional neuroimaging data cannot demonstrate the actual role of a particular cortical activation in a specific function because an activated area may simply be correlated with task performance, rather than being responsible for it. NIBS can induce a temporary modification of performance only if the stimulated area is causally engaged in the task. In analogy with lesion studies, NIBS can provide information about where and when a particular process occurs. Based on this assumption, NIBS has been used in many different cognitive domains. However, one of the most interesting questions in neuroscience may not be where and when, but how cognitive activity occurs. Beyond localization approaches, NIBS can be employed to study brain mechanisms. NIBS techniques have the potential to influence behavior transiently by altering neuronal activity, which may have facilitatory or inhibitory behavioral effects. NIBS techniques include transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). TMS has been shown transiently to modulate neural excitability in a manner that is dependent mainly on the timing and frequency of stimulation (high versus low). The mechanism underlying tES is a change in neuronal membrane potentials that appears to be dependent mainly on the direction of current flow (anodal versus cathodal). Nevertheless, the final effects induced by TMS or tES depend on many technical parameters used during stimulation, such as the intensity of stimulation, coil orientation, site of the reference electrode, and time of application. Moreover, an important factor is the possible interactions between these factors and the physiological and cognitive state of the subject. To use NIBS in cognition, it is important to understand not only how NIBS functions but also the brain mechanisms being studied and the features of the area of interest. To describe better the advanced knowledge provided by NIBS in cognition, we will treat each NIBS technique separately and underline the related hypotheses beyond applications.

[1]  C. Umilta,et al.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: A new synthesis of methodological issues , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  C. Sherrington Flexion‐reflex of the limb, crossed extension‐reflex, and reflex stepping and standing , 1910, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  New light through old windows: Moving beyond the “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, NeuroImage.

[4]  T. Bliss,et al.  Plasticity in the human central nervous system. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  G. Fink,et al.  Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Tomás Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye ®eld Facilitates Visual Awareness , 2022 .

[7]  L. Bindman,et al.  Long-lasting Changes in the Level of the Electrical Activity of the Cerebral Cortex produced by Polarizing Currents , 1962, Nature.

[8]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Klaus Funke,et al.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single‐unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Jarmo Ruohonen,et al.  Chapter 1 Background physics for magnetic stimulation , 2003 .

[11]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Magnetic stimulation studies of visual cognition , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Denis Schluppeck,et al.  Temporal characteristics of global motion processing revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Simone Gori,et al.  The neural basis of the Enigma illusion: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal? , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  The mechanism of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognition , 2010, Cortex.

[18]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  A shift of visual spatial attention is selectively associated with human EEG alpha activity , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[19]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The Role of Alpha-Band Brain Oscillations as a Sensory Suppression Mechanism during Selective Attention , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[20]  M Seyal,et al.  Suppression of cutaneous perception by magnetic pulse stimulation of the human brain. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Alpha-generation as basic response-signature to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) targeting the human resting motor cortex: a TMS/EEG co-registration study. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[22]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Electrical Stimulation of the Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[23]  J. Solomon The history of dipper functions , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Two periods of processing in the (circum)striate visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  V. Walsh,et al.  State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[27]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: a tutorial and review of application , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  J. Born,et al.  Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory , 2006, Nature.

[30]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  State-dependent TMS reveals a hierarchical representation of observed acts in the temporal, parietal, and premotor cortices. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[32]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[33]  M Gangitano,et al.  Chronometry of parietal and prefrontal activations in verbal working memory revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2003, NeuroImage.

[34]  A T Barker,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the human brain and peripheral nervous system: an introduction and the results of an initial clinical evaluation. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[35]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Enhances Individual Alpha Activity in Human EEG , 2010, PloS one.

[37]  Brian N. Pasley,et al.  State-Dependent Variability of Neuronal Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Visual Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[38]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  The neural mechanisms of the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on perception. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  G. R. Fink,et al.  Ameliorating spatial neglect with non-invasive brain stimulation: From pathophysiological concepts to novel treatment strategies , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[40]  C. Miniussi,et al.  New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS–EEG studies , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacology of transcranial direct current stimulation: missing effect of riluzole. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[42]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  Anomia training and brain stimulation in chronic aphasia , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[43]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Modelling contrast discrimination data suggest both the pedestal effect and stochastic resonance to be caused by the same mechanism. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[44]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  P. Schyns,et al.  Entrainment of Perceptually Relevant Brain Oscillations by Non-Invasive Rhythmic Stimulation of the Human Brain , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[46]  Gary W. Thickbroom,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: experimental framework and human models , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  P. Rossini,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive rehabilitation , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[48]  J. Rothwell,et al.  How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition , 2009, Cortex.

[49]  Li Yue,et al.  The effects of chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid in rat brain , 2009, Brain Research.

[50]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Accurate and Rapid Estimation of Phosphene Thresholds (REPT) , 2011, PloS one.

[51]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[52]  Michele Hilmes Never Ending Story , 2013 .

[53]  Brian N. Pasley,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Elicits Coupled Neural and Hemodynamic Consequences , 2007, Science.

[54]  J. Gross,et al.  On the Role of Prestimulus Alpha Rhythms over Occipito-Parietal Areas in Visual Input Regulation: Correlation or Causation? , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  V. Amassian,et al.  Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[56]  O. Lippold,et al.  Prolonged changes in excitability of pyramidal tract neurones in the cat: a post‐synaptic mechanism. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[57]  P. Schyns,et al.  Rhythmic TMS Causes Local Entrainment of Natural Oscillatory Signatures , 2011, Current Biology.

[58]  F. Fregni,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation with Low-Intensity Electrical Currents: Putative Mechanisms of Action for Direct and Alternating Current Stimulation , 2010, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[59]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  A study of the effects of lorazepam and dextromethorphan on the response to cortical 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2005, Neuroreport.

[60]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation over V5 Enhances Visuomotor Coordination by Improving Motion Perception in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  John C. Rothwell,et al.  Therapeutic uses of rTMS , 2003 .

[63]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[64]  P. Rossini,et al.  Cerebral restorative plasticity from normal ageing to brain diseases: a "never ending story". , 2010, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[65]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[66]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Improved language performance in Alzheimer disease following brain stimulation , 2010, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[67]  G. Tononi,et al.  Breakdown of Cortical Effective Connectivity During Sleep , 2005, Science.

[68]  Stefan Knecht,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Language Learning , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  M. Ridding,et al.  Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non‐invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[70]  Y. Kim,et al.  Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory , 2008, Neuroreport.

[71]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[72]  F. M. Mottaghy,et al.  Facilitation of picture naming by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke’s area , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Testing for causality with transcranial direct current stimulation: pitch memory and the left supramarginal gyrus , 2006, Neuroreport.

[74]  W. Paulus Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES – tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[75]  M Hallett,et al.  Dextromethorphan decreases the excitability of the human motor cortex , 1998, Neurology.

[76]  A. Moser,et al.  Neuronal electrical high frequency stimulation enhances GABA outflow from human neocortical slices , 2006, Neurochemistry International.

[77]  B. Payne,et al.  Bilateral impact of unilateral visual cortex lesions on the superior colliculus , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[78]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Using state‐dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex: a comparison of TMS‐priming and TMS‐adaptation paradigms , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[79]  L. Bindman,et al.  The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effects , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[80]  E Corthout,et al.  Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[81]  B. Dreher,et al.  Relationship between contrast adaptation and orientation tuning in V1 and V2 of cat visual cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[82]  Julie M. Baker,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Naming Reaction Time in Fluent Aphasia: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study , 2011, Stroke.

[83]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Combining TMS and EEG Offers New Prospects in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2009, Brain Topography.

[84]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  The Functional Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Signal Suppression or Neural Noise Generation? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[85]  Filippo Brighina,et al.  A Case Study of Primary Progressive Aphasia: Improvement on Verbs After rTMS Treatment , 2006, Neurocase.

[86]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[87]  B L Day,et al.  Some experiences of techniques for stimulation of the human cerebral motor cortex through the scalp. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[88]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Brain stimulation and behavioural cognitive rehabilitation: A new tool for neurorehabilitation? , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[89]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[90]  Erol Başar,et al.  EEG responses to combined somatosensory and transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[91]  Debora Brignani,et al.  Combining Transcranial Electrical Stimulation With Electroencephalography , 2012, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[92]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection , 2009, Trends in Neurosciences.

[93]  P M Rossini,et al.  The role of the left frontal lobe in action naming: rTMS evidence , 2002, Neurology.

[94]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  The effect of TMS on visual motion sensitivity: an increase in neural noise or a decrease in signal strength? , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[95]  Yuan-wu Mei,et al.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the expression of c-Fos and brain-derived neurotrophic factor of the cerebral cortex in rats with cerebral infarct , 2007, Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban.

[96]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[97]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  Effects of Right Parietal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Object Identification and Orientation Judgments , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[98]  L. Cohen,et al.  Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive neurorehabilitation , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[99]  S. Sato,et al.  Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals , 2005, Neurology.

[100]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Memory Decline , 2012, Neurobiology of Aging.

[101]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[102]  G. Fink,et al.  Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[103]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[104]  A. Barker,et al.  NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX , 1985, The Lancet.

[105]  S. Cramer,et al.  BDNF val66met polymorphism is associated with modified experience-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[106]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Anticipatory Biasing of Visuospatial Attention Indexed by Retinotopically Specific α-Bank Electroencephalography Increases over Occipital Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[107]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  The role of the angular gyrus in the modulation of visuospatial attention by the mental number line , 2009, NeuroImage.

[108]  Katsuyuki Sakai,et al.  Task-specific signal transmission from prefrontal cortex in visual selective attention , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[109]  Anusha Venkatakrishnan,et al.  Combining transcranial direct current stimulation and neuroimaging: novel insights in understanding neuroplasticity. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[110]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation to assess and modulate neuroplasticity in Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[111]  A. Antal,et al.  Increasing Human Brain Excitability by Transcranial High-Frequency Random Noise Stimulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[112]  W. Paulus,et al.  Breaks during 5Hz rTMS are essential for facilitatory after effects , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[113]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Using Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation to Treat Stroke Patients With Aphasia , 2010, Stroke.

[114]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Reliability, synchrony and noise , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[115]  Itamar Kahn,et al.  Transient disruption of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during verbal encoding affects subsequent memory performance. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[116]  Heidi M. Schambra,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation Promotes BDNF-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: Potential Implications for Motor Learning , 2010, Neuron.

[117]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Stochastic Resonance Effects Reveal the Neural Mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[118]  P. Rossini,et al.  Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on serum brain derived neurotrophic factor in drug resistant depressed patients. , 2006, Journal of affective disorders.

[119]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Naming facilitation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[120]  R. Hanajima,et al.  Bidirectional long‐term motor cortical plasticity and metaplasticity induced by quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[121]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[122]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Enhancing language performance with non-invasive brain stimulation—A transcranial direct current stimulation study in healthy humans , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[123]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional role of cross-frequency coupling , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[124]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[125]  David E. J. Linden,et al.  Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional imaging in cognitive brain research: possibilities and limitations , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[126]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Random Noise Stimulation Improves Neuroplasticity in Perceptual Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[127]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. , 1962, Experimental neurology.

[128]  Valentina Fiori,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Word Retrieval in Healthy and Nonfluent Aphasic Subjects , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[129]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Mechanisms of Deafferentation-Induced Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[130]  Robin Laycock,et al.  Evidence for fast signals and later processing in human V1/V2 and V5/MT+: A TMS study of motion perception. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.