Follow‐up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) remote viewing experiments☆
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Houran,et al. 'Feeling' or 'sensing' the future? Testing for anomalous cognitions in clinical versus healthy populations , 2022, Heliyon.
[2] E. Lebel,et al. Beyond the BICS Essays: Envisioning a More Rigorous Preregistered Survival Study , 2022, Journal of Scientific Exploration.
[3] H. Bauer,et al. 'Fringe Science'—A Tautology, Not Pariah , 2022, Journal of Scientific Exploration.
[4] J. Houran,et al. Adversarial Collaboration on a Drake-S Equation for the Survival Question , 2022, Journal of Scientific Exploration.
[5] J. Kennedy. Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems , 2022 .
[6] Álex Escolà-Gascón,et al. The Multivariable Multiaxial Suggestibility Inventory-2 (MMSI-2): A Psychometric Alternative to Measure and Explain Supernatural Experiences , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.
[7] Andrew Denovan,et al. Paranormal Belief, Thinking Style and Delusion Formation: A Latent Profile Analysis of Within-Individual Variations in Experience-Based Paranormal Facets , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.
[8] K. Drinkwater,et al. Conceptual and clinical implications of a “Haunted People Syndrome”. , 2021 .
[9] John G. Kruth. Associative Remote Viewing for Profit: Evaluating the Importance of the Judge and the Investment Instrument , 2021 .
[10] R. Mauri. A Non-local Phase Field Model of Bohm’s Quantum Potential , 2021, Foundations of Physics.
[11] Patrizio E. Tressoldi,et al. Stage 1 Registered Report: Anomalous perception in a Ganzfeld condition - A meta-analysis of more than 40 years investigation , 2021, F1000Research.
[12] Diego Avendaño,et al. Revised and short versions of the pseudoscientific belief scale , 2021 .
[13] Álex Escolà-Gascón. Forced-choice experiment on Anomalous Information Reception and correlations with states of consciousness using the Multivariable Multiaxial Suggestibility Inventory-2 (MMSI-2). , 2020, Explore.
[14] Álex Escolà-Gascón. Researching unexplained phenomena II: new evidences for anomalous experiences supported by the Multivariable Multiaxial Suggestibility Inventory-2 (MMSI-2) , 2020 .
[15] Th. Rabeyron. Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.
[16] Yong Cheng. CURRENT RESEARCH ON GÖDEL’S INCOMPLETENESS THEOREMS , 2020, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic.
[17] R. Schoot,et al. Tutorial: jamovi for Bayesian analyses with default priors , 2020 .
[18] Álex Escolà-Gascón. Researching unexplained phenomena: empirical-statistical validity and reliability of the Multivariable Multiaxial Suggestibility Inventory-2 (MMSI-2) , 2020, Heliyon.
[19] Agnieszka J. Jaroslawska,et al. How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes From an Extended Adversarial Collaboration , 2020, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[20] P. Dixon,et al. Assessing evidence for replication: A likelihood-based approach , 2020, Behavior Research Methods.
[21] C. Roe,et al. Performance at a Precognitive Remote Viewing Task, with and without Ganzfeld Stimulation: Three Experiments , 2020 .
[22] A. Reber,et al. Searching for the impossible: Parapsychology's elusive quest. , 2020, The American psychologist.
[23] Nemo C. Mörck. The Star Gate Archives : Reports of the United States Government Sponsored Psi Program, 1972–1995. Volume 3: Psychokinesis compiled and edited by Edwin C. May and Sonali Bhatt Marwaha , 2020, Journal of Scientific Exploration.
[24] Russell Targ,et al. What Do We Know about Psi? The First Decade of Remote-Viewing Research and Operations at Stanford Research Institute , 2019 .
[25] M. Wittmann,et al. Remote Meditation Support - A Multimodal Distant Intention Experiment. , 2019, Explore.
[26] J. Utts. An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning , 2019, Journal of Parapsychology.
[27] R. Hyman,et al. A Joint Communiqué: The Psi Ganzfeld Controversy , 2019, Journal of Parapsychology.
[28] E. Cardeña. The experimental evidence for parapsychological phenomena: A review. , 2018, The American psychologist.
[29] D. Hooper,et al. Cross-examining the case for precognition: Comment on Mossbridge and Radin (2018). , 2018 .
[30] J. Schooler,et al. Entertaining Without Endorsing: The Case for the Scientific Investigation of Anomalous Cognition , 2018 .
[31] D. Kornbrot,et al. Quality science from quality measurement: The role of measurement type with respect to replication and effect size magnitude in psychological research , 2018, PloS one.
[32] ALBERT VISSER,et al. ANOTHER LOOK AT THE SECOND INCOMPLETENESS THEOREM , 2017, The Review of Symbolic Logic.
[33] Marc H Bornstein,et al. Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research. , 2016, Developmental review : DR.
[34] Andrew Parker,et al. Toward a Better Understanding of the Relationship between Belief in the Paranormal and Statistical Bias: The Potential Role of Schizotypy , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[35] Michael B. Duggan,et al. Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events , 2016, F1000Research.
[36] T. Lanciano,et al. Does Emotions Communication Ability Affect Psychological Well-Being? A Study with the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) v2.0 , 2015, Health communication.
[37] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Quantum-like modeling of cognition , 2015, Front. Phys..
[38] D. Trafimow,et al. Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[39] E. Close,et al. The concept of relative non-locality: theoretical implications in consciousness research. , 2015, Explore.
[40] Markus A. Maier,et al. Feeling the Future Again: Retroactive Avoidance of Negative Stimuli , 2014 .
[41] M. Leifer. ψ-Epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[42] H. Irwin,et al. Paranormal beliefs and cognitive processes underlying the formation of delusions , 2012 .
[43] Julia Mossbridge,et al. Predictive Physiological Anticipation Preceding Seemingly Unpredictable Stimuli: A Meta-Analysis , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[44] Patrizio Emanuele Tressoldi. Replication Unreliability in Psychology: Elusive Phenomena or “Elusive” Statistical Power? , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[45] M. Thalbourne,et al. Has the sheep-goat variable had its day?: Testing transliminality as a psi predictor , 2012 .
[46] H. Irwin,et al. Paranormal belief and biases in reasoning underlying the formation of delusions , 2012 .
[47] Stuart J. Ritchie,et al. Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem's ‘Retroactive Facilitation of Recall’ Effect , 2012, PloS one.
[48] J. Carter. Radical Skepticism, Closure, and Robust Knowledge , 2011 .
[49] Patrizio Emanuele Tressoldi. Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence: The Case of Non-Local Perception, a Classical and Bayesian Review of Evidences , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[50] E. Wagenmakers,et al. Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[51] D. Bem. Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[52] R. Langdon,et al. The experience of altered states of consciousness in shamanic ritual: The role of pre-existing beliefs and affective factors , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.
[53] C. Ferguson. An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. , 2009 .
[54] Phil Wood. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2008 .
[55] R. Jahn,et al. Information and uncertainty in remote perception research. , 2007, Explore.
[56] H. Walach,et al. Synchronistic phenomena as entanglement correlations in generalized quantum theory , 2007 .
[57] R. Wooffitt. Epistemic Authority and Neutrality in the Discourse of Psychic Practitioners: Toward a Naturalistic Parapsychology , 2007 .
[58] Lucy Odling-Smee,et al. The lab that asked the wrong questions , 2007, Nature.
[59] Richard Wiseman,et al. Of two minds: Sceptic-proponent collaboration within parapsychology. , 2006, British journal of psychology.
[60] R. Henry. The mental Universe , 2005, Nature.
[61] M. Osman. An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[62] Rense Lange,et al. A Rasch scaling validation of a 'core' near-death experience. , 2004, British journal of psychology.
[63] R. Warner,et al. Emotional intelligence and its relation to everyday behaviour , 2004 .
[64] Jonathan Evans. In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[65] J. Kennedy. The Capricious, Actively Evasive, Unsustainable Nature of Psi: A Summary and Hypotheses , 2003 .
[66] P. Salovey,et al. Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. , 2003, Emotion.
[67] M. Srinivasan. Clairvoyant remote viewing: The US sponsored psychic spying , 2002 .
[68] M. Thalbourne,et al. Measures of the Sheep-Goat Variable, Transliminality, and Their Correlates , 2001, Psychological reports.
[69] P. Salovey,et al. Models of emotional intelligence , 2000 .
[70] E. C. May. The American Institutes for Research Review of the Department of Defense's Star Gate Program: A Commentary , 1996 .
[71] Glenn Geher,et al. Emotional intelligence and the identification of emotion , 1996 .
[72] Ray Hyman,et al. Evaluation of the Program on Anomalous Mental Phenomena , 1995 .
[73] P. Salovey,et al. Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings , 1995 .
[74] Jacob Cohen. The earth is round (p < .05) , 1994 .
[75] Theodor Landis,et al. A ‘sheep‐goat effect’ in repetition avoidance: Extra‐sensory perception as an effect of subjective probability? , 1990 .
[76] Gary James Jason,et al. The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .
[77] R. Hyman. Parapsychological research: A tutorial review and critical appraisal , 1986, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[78] R. Lazarus. Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. , 1982 .
[79] R. Targ,et al. Information transmission in remote viewing experiments , 1980, Nature.
[80] R. Zajonc. Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .
[81] DAVID MARKS,et al. Information transmission in remote viewing experiments , 1978, Nature.
[82] C. Tart. Learning to Use Extrasensory Perception , 1976 .
[83] R. Targ,et al. Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding , 1974, Nature.
[84] S. Krippner,et al. Clairvoyant Perception of Target Material in Three States of Consciousness , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.
[85] Jacob Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[86] Measurement Invariance , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[87] R. Lange,et al. Anomalous experiences and paranormal attributions: Psychometric challenges in studying their measurement and relationship. , 2019 .
[88] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[89] D. Luke. Anomalous phenomena, psi and altered consciousness , 2011 .
[90] R. Gunderman,et al. Emotional intelligence. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[91] Robert D. Daniels,et al. Quality of Science , 2011 .
[92] C. Scott,et al. Remote viewing , 2005, Experientia.
[93] H. E. Puthoff,et al. CIA-Initiated Remote Viewing Program at Stanford Research Institute , 1996 .
[94] Robert G. Jahn,et al. Precognitive Remote Perception: Replication of Remote Viewing , 1996 .
[95] B. Iwata,et al. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[96] Mario Bunge,et al. La ciencia: su método y su filosofía , 1981 .