Channel Sensing in Molecular Communications With Single Type of Ligand Receptors

Molecular communication (MC) uses molecules as information carriers between nanomachines. MC channel in practice can be crowded with different types of molecules, i.e., ligands, which can have similar binding properties causing severe cross-talk on ligand receptors. Simultaneous sensing of multiple ligand types provides opportunities for eliminating interference of external molecular sources and multi-user interference, and developing new multiple access techniques for MC nanonetworks. In this paper, we investigate channel sensing methods that use only a single type of receptors and exploit the amount of time receptors stay bound and unbound during ligand-receptor binding reaction to concurrently estimate the concentration of multiple types of ligands. We derive the Cramér-Rao Lower Bound for multi-ligand estimation, and propose practical and low-complexity suboptimal estimators for channel sensing. We analyze the performance of the proposed methods in terms of normalized mean squared error (NMSE), and show that they can efficiently estimate the concentration of ligands up to 10 different types with an average NMSE far below $10^{-2}$ . Lastly, we propose a synthetic receptor design based on modified kinetic proofreading scheme to sample the unbound and bound time durations, and a chemical reaction network to perform the required computations in synthetic cells.

[1]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  The Internet of Molecular Things Based on FRET , 2016, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[2]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Maximum A-Posteriori Decoding for Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication Using Analog Filters , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[3]  Ilya Nemenman,et al.  Simple biochemical networks allow accurate sensing of multiple ligands with a single receptor , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Raghupathy Sivakumar,et al.  Time-Elapse Communication: Bacterial Communication on a Microfluidic Chip , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[5]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  On the Physical Design of Molecular Communication Receiver Based on Nanoscale Biosensors , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[6]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  The Internet of nano-things , 2010, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[7]  Nicholas P. Jewell,et al.  Mixtures of Exponential Distributions , 1982 .

[8]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[9]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  Transmitter and Receiver Architectures for Molecular Communications: A Survey on Physical Design With Modulation, Coding, and Detection Techniques , 2019, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of SiNW FET-Based Molecular Communication Receiver , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[11]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Molecular determinants of drug-receptor binding kinetics. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[12]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Molecular communication options for long range nanonetworks , 2009, Comput. Networks.

[13]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Detection With Ligand Receptors for Diffusion-Based Molecular Communications in Internet of Bio-Nano Things , 2018, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[14]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Chemical reaction networks for computing logarithm , 2017, Synthetic biology.

[15]  Thierry Mora,et al.  Physical Limit to Concentration Sensing Amid Spurious Ligands. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[16]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  Fundamentals of Molecular Information and Communication Science , 2017, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  Rahul Sarpeshkar,et al.  Synthetic analog computation in living cells , 2013, Nature.

[18]  Paul François,et al.  Chemodetection in fluctuating environments: Receptor coupling, buffering, and antagonism , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  Selective Signal Detection with Ligand Receptors Under Interference in Molecular Communications , 2018, 2018 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC).

[20]  Chan-Byoung Chae,et al.  Novel Modulation Techniques using Isomers as Messenger Molecules for Nano Communication Networks via Diffusion , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Robert Schober,et al.  Joint Channel Parameter Estimation via Diffusive Molecular Communication , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[23]  Y. Koucheryavy,et al.  The internet of Bio-Nano things , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[24]  Vahid Jamali,et al.  Channel Estimation for Diffusive Molecular Communications , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[25]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Modulation Techniques for Communication via Diffusion in Nanonetworks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[26]  V. Hasselblad Finite mixtures of distributions from the exponential family , 1969 .

[27]  Vahid Jamali,et al.  Biological Optical-to-Chemical Signal Conversion Interface: A Small-Scale Modulator for Molecular Communications. , 2019, IEEE transactions on nanobioscience.

[28]  Sebastian Magierowski,et al.  Optimum receiver for molecule shift keying modulation in diffusion-based molecular communication channels , 2012, Nano Commun. Networks.

[29]  Robert Schober,et al.  Comprehensive Reactive Receiver Modeling for Diffusive Molecular Communication Systems: Reversible Binding, Molecule Degradation, and Finite Number of Receptors , 2016, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[30]  T. Suda,et al.  Microplatform for intercellular communication , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems.

[31]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  A Markovian Approach to the Optimal Demodulation of Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[32]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Cognitive radio sensor networks , 2009, IEEE Network.

[33]  W. Bialek Biophysics: Searching for Principles , 2012 .

[34]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Maximum likelihood and the single receptor. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[35]  Ergin Dinc,et al.  Theoretical Limits on Multiuser Molecular Communication in Internet of Nano-Bio Things , 2017, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[36]  Eric D. Siggia,et al.  Decisions on the fly in cellular sensory systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  A. Berezhkovskii,et al.  Effect of ligand diffusion on occupancy fluctuations of cell-surface receptors. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[38]  Vahid Jamali,et al.  Biological Optical-to-Chemical Signal Conversion Interface: A Small-Scale Modulator for Molecular Communications , 2018, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[39]  Adam Noel,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Molecular Communication Systems With a Reversible Adsorption Receiver , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[40]  Mehdi Maleki,et al.  On the Coexistence of Nano Networks: Sensing Techniques for Molecular Communications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.