Assessing the Consequential Role of Infrastructural Facilities in Academic Performance of Students in Pakistan

Physical infrastructure facilities are the compulsory components of any educational institution and are directly associated with better performance of students not only in academics but also in co-curricular activities. The current study has been undertaken to investigate students’ academic performance, behavioral components’ development and teachers’-students’ relations in Pakhtun society of Malakand division Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. The study has been approached through qualitative and quantitative design where the data is obtained from secondary sources like books, journals, magazines, reports and internet sources. Besides, the study has been framed in theoretical metaanalysis stance and an extensive work of economists that focuses on the efficiency of education measured through different inputs, building and class size, quality of physical facilities, students-teachers relation to educational outputs, such as test scores, obtained grades, class participation and social and moral development of students (Hanushek, 1999); Hoxby, 2000; Johnson, 2000; Krueger and Whitmore, 2000). For empirical analysis, data has been colleted from 120 samples of two boys’ government high schools applying purposive sampling technique and keeping accessibility to these schools in context. The collected information was finally classified through a computer based program and presented in tables along-with observations. The study shows that there is a positive relationship between physical infrastructural facilities and student’s academic performance and personality development.

[1]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  School Size, Characteristics, and Outcomes , 1991 .

[2]  Kirk A. Johnson Do Small Classes Influence Academic Achievement? What the National Assessment of Educational Progress Shows. A Report of the Heritage Center for Data Analysis. , 2000 .

[3]  Péter,et al.  Facilities , 1978, Higher Education Abstracts.

[4]  L. Meskin,et al.  Breath of fresh air. , 1996, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[5]  K. Cotton,et al.  New Small Learning Communities: Findings from Recent Literature. , 2001 .

[6]  Craig B. Howley,et al.  The Matthew Project: National Report. , 1999 .

[7]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. , 1971 .

[8]  Tom Gregory Small Is Too Big: Achieving a Critical Anti-Mass in the High School. , 1992 .

[9]  Craig B. Howley,et al.  Research about School Size and School Performance in Impoverished Communities. ERIC Digest. , 2000 .

[10]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An Update , 1997 .

[11]  M. Blank,et al.  Student and Educator Perceptions of the Impact of an Alternative School Structure. , 1993 .

[12]  Glen I. Earthman A Statewide Study of Student Achievement and Behavior and School Building Condition. , 1995 .

[13]  Denise C. Gottfredson,et al.  School Size and School Disorder. , 1985 .

[14]  Craig B. Howley,et al.  The Matthew Principle: A West Virginia Replication?. , 1995 .

[15]  Mark Schneider,et al.  Choosing Schools , 2021 .

[16]  Susanna Loeb,et al.  School Size in Chicago Elementary Schools: Effects on Teachers' Attitudes and Students' Achievement , 2000 .

[17]  Valerie E. Lee,et al.  High School Size: Which Works Best and for Whom? , 1996 .

[18]  Joe Nathan,et al.  Smaller, Safer, Saner, Successful Schools. , 2001 .

[19]  Mary Anne Raywid Current Literature on Small Schools. ERIC Digest. , 1999 .

[20]  Rocky Mountain,et al.  COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITY PLANNERS, INTERNATIONAL , 2010 .

[21]  Roger P. Greenberg,et al.  How Science Takes Stock: The Story of Meta-Analysis. , 1998 .

[22]  Carolyn S. Breda,et al.  Evidence from project star about class size and student achievement , 1989 .

[23]  C. Hoxby The Effects of Class Size on Student Achievement: New Evidence from Population Variation , 2000 .

[24]  M. Fisher,et al.  Living at Micro Scale , 2011 .

[25]  Glen I. Earthman,et al.  Where Children Learn: A Discussion of How a Facility Affects Learning. , 1998 .

[26]  J. Howard Bowers,et al.  Relationship of Student Achievement and Characteristics in Two Selected School Facility Environmental Settings. , 1987 .

[27]  F. Mosteller The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. , 1995, The Future of children.

[28]  R. Barker,et al.  Big school, small school : high school size and student behavior , 1965 .

[29]  Ronald F. Ferguson Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money , 1991 .

[30]  Tak Cheung Chan,et al.  The Impact of School Building Age on Pupil Achievement. , 1979 .

[31]  Craig Howley,et al.  The Academic Effectiveness of Small-Scale Schooling (An Update). ERIC Digest. , 1994 .

[32]  H. Walberg On Local Control: Is Bigger Better?. , 1992 .

[33]  Shirley M. Hord,et al.  Professional Learning Communities: Educators Work Together toward a Shared Purpose. , 2009 .

[34]  Robert B. Pittman,et al.  Influence of High School Size on Dropout Rate , 1987 .

[35]  J W Swing,et al.  EFFECTS OF NOISE ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND CLASSROOM BEHAVIOR , 1981 .

[36]  Mary Anne Raywid,et al.  "Small" Revolution in New York City , 1994 .

[37]  Patricia A. Wasley,et al.  Small Schools: Great Strides. A Study of New Small Schools in Chicago. , 2000 .

[38]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Introduction to psychology, 9th ed. , 1987 .

[39]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement , 1996 .