The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development

In management accounting research, the capabilities of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) have only partially been utilized. These yet unexploited capabilities of PLS-SEM are a useful tool in the often explorative state of research in management accounting. After reviewing eleven top-ranked management accounting journals through the end of 2013, 37 articles in which PLS-SEM is used are identified. These articles are analysed based on multiple relevant criteria to determine the progress in this research area, including the reasons for using PLS-SEM, the characteristics of the data and the models, and model evaluation and reporting. A special focus is placed on the degree of importance of these analysed criteria for the future development of management accounting research. To ensure continued theoretical development in management accounting, this article also offers recommendations to avoid common pitfalls and provides guidance for the advanced use of PLS-SEM in management accounting research.

[1]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[2]  Michael R Chernick,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers , 2007 .

[3]  Frank H.M. Verbeeten,et al.  Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance , 2008 .

[4]  A. Diamantopoulos,et al.  Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective , 2012 .

[5]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Rethinking Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Breaking Chains and Forging Ahead , 2014 .

[6]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[7]  William Lewis,et al.  Does PLS Have Advantages for Small Sample Size or Non-Normal Data? , 2012, MIS Q..

[8]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[9]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[10]  Josep Bisbe,et al.  How control systems influence product innovation processes: examining the role of entrepreneurial orientation , 2015 .

[11]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares , 2016 .

[12]  C. Lau,et al.  The role of organisational concern for workplace fairness in the choice of a performance measurement system , 2012 .

[13]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Mapping Management Accounting: Graphics and Guidelines for Theory-Consistent Empirical Research , 2003 .

[14]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing , 2002 .

[15]  Aldónio Ferreira,et al.  Environmental management accounting and innovation: an exploratory analysis , 2010 .

[16]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[17]  Malcolm Smith,et al.  Research Methods in Accounting , 2003 .

[18]  Josep Bisbe,et al.  Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification , 2007 .

[19]  Sergeja Slapničar,et al.  The perceived fairness of performance evaluation: The role of uncertainty , 2012 .

[20]  Christopher J. Skousen,et al.  Characterizing Accounting Research , 2009 .

[21]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  You Write, but Others Read: Common Methodological Misunderstandings in PLS and Related Methods , 2013 .

[22]  Margaret A. Abernethy,et al.  Leadership and Control System Design , 2010 .

[23]  Lili-Anne Kihn,et al.  Information system integration, enabling control and performance , 2009 .

[24]  T. Dijkstra.  PLS' Janus Face – Response to Professor Rigdon's ‘Rethinking Partial Least Squares Modeling: In Praise of Simple Methods’ , 2014 .

[25]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  The effect of outcome and process accountability on customer–supplier negotiations , 2013 .

[26]  Sven Modell,et al.  Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: An assessment of validity implications , 2005 .

[27]  Laurence van Lent,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers , 2006 .

[28]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Reflections on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2014 .

[29]  R. Chenhall.  Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study , 2005 .

[30]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2010 .

[31]  Markus Eberl,et al.  An Application of PLS in Multi-Group Analysis: The Need for Differentiated Corporate-Level Marketing in the Mobile Communications Industry , 2010 .

[32]  Ryan T. Wright,et al.  Assessing Common Method Bias: Problems with the ULMC Technique , 2012, MIS Q..

[33]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[34]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research , 2003 .

[35]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[36]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[37]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS , 2014 .

[38]  R. Chenhall.  Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[39]  Michael D. Shields.  Established Management Accounting Knowledge , 2015 .

[40]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions , 1974 .

[41]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Handbook of management accounting research , 2007 .

[42]  Robert H. Chenhall,et al.  The Role of Cognitive and Affective Conflict in Early Implementation of Activity‐Based Cost Management , 2004 .

[43]  David Smith,et al.  A Review of Australian Management Accounting Research: 1980-2009 , 2011 .

[44]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[45]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[46]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[47]  Roland F. Speklé,et al.  Explaining management control structure variety: a transaction cost economics perspective , 2001 .

[48]  R. Chenhall.  Developing an Organizational Perspective to Management Accounting , 2012 .

[49]  Frank H.M. Verbeeten,et al.  The impact of subjectivity in performance evaluation practices on public sector managers’ motivation , 2012 .

[50]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications , 2012 .

[51]  Valérie Swaen,et al.  Environmental Management Control Systems: The role of contextual and strategic factors , 2013 .

[52]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[53]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  Fujun Lai,et al.  Using Partial Least Squares in Operations Management Research: A Practical Guideline and Summary of Past Research , 2012 .

[55]  W. Reinartz,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM , 2009 .

[56]  Andreas M. Kaplan,et al.  The Influence of Observed Heterogeneity on Path Coefficient Significance: Technology Acceptance Within the Marketing Discipline , 2011 .

[57]  Amran Rasli,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in Causal Inference for Archival Financial Accounting Research , 2014 .

[58]  L. Allison Jones-Farmer,et al.  Why you should consider SEM: A guide to getting started , 2006 .

[59]  Nathan S. Hartman,et al.  Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique , 2010 .

[60]  Stacie Petter,et al.  On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research , 2011, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Waymond Rodgers,et al.  Potential model misspecification bias: Formative indicators enhancing theory for accounting researchers , 2011 .

[62]  Mahfud Sholihin,et al.  Fairness in performance evaluation and its behavioural consequences , 2009 .

[63]  Ryan T. Wright,et al.  Controlling for Common Method Variance in PLS Analysis: The Measured Latent Marker Variable Approach , 2013 .

[64]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Strengthening causal inferences in positivist field studies , 2014 .

[65]  Daniel S. J. Costa,et al.  Testing complex models with small sample sizes: A historical overview and empirical demonstration of what Partial Least Squares (PLS) can offer differential psychology , 2015 .

[66]  Laurence van Lent,et al.  Performance measure properties and the effect of incentive contracts , 2006 .

[67]  Kenneth J. Smith,et al.  The Role of Stress Arousal in the Dynamics of the Stressor‐to‐Illness Process among Accountants* , 1993 .

[68]  Vijay Sathe,et al.  Controller involvement in management , 1982 .

[69]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[70]  Fabienne Miller,et al.  Modeling the Antecedents of Preferences for Incomplete Contracts in Bilateral Trade: An Experimental Investigation , 2013 .

[71]  T. Dijkstra.  Some comments on maximum likelihood and partial least squares methods , 1983 .

[72]  Frank G. H. Hartmann,et al.  Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change , 2007 .

[73]  Nancy K. Lankton,et al.  Integrated Information Systems and Alliance Partner Trust , 2011 .

[74]  Mahfud Sholihin,et al.  Goal-setting participation and goal commitment: Examining the mediating roles of procedural fairness and interpersonal trust in a UK financial services organisation , 2011 .

[75]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm , 2010, Comput. Stat..

[76]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications , 2010 .

[77]  Matthew D. Hall,et al.  The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance , 2008 .

[78]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Effect of internal cost management, information systems integration, and absorptive capacity on inter-organizational cost management in supply chains☆ , 2012 .

[79]  J. Henseler.  Partial least squares path modeling , 2017 .

[80]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli,et al.  Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research , 2009, MIS Q..

[81]  Carlin Dowling,et al.  Appropriate Audit Support System Use: The Influence of Auditor, Audit Team and Firm Factors , 2008 .

[82]  Frank G. H. Hartmann,et al.  How Top Management Teams Use Management Accounting Systems to Implement Strategy , 2006 .

[83]  C. Fornell.  A Second generation of multivariate analysis : classification of methods and implications for marketing research , 1985 .

[84]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Measurement and Meaning in Information Systems and Organizational Research: Methodological and Philosophical Foundations , 2011, MIS Q..

[85]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[86]  Nebojsa S. Davcik,et al.  The use and misuse of structural equation modeling in management research , 2014 .

[87]  A. Panter,et al.  Writing about structural equation models. , 1995 .

[88]  Sergeja Slapničar,et al.  How Formal Performance Evaluation Affects Trust between Superior and Subordinate Managers , 2009 .

[89]  Herman Wold,et al.  Model Construction and Evaluation When Theoretical Knowledge Is Scarce , 1980 .

[90]  Frank G. H. Hartmann,et al.  Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis , 1999 .

[91]  S. Mark Young,et al.  Factors influencing the performance of activity based costing teams: a field study of ABC model development time in the automobile industry☆ , 2002 .

[92]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[93]  Janet G. Hamilton,et al.  The surprising viability of a simple alternate estimation procedure for construction of large‐scale structural equation measurement models , 1994 .

[94]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[95]  Frank Moers,et al.  The Issue of Endogeneity within Theory-Based, Quantitative Management Accounting Research , 2007 .

[96]  Marie Adele Hughes,et al.  An integrative framework for theory construction and testing , 1990 .

[97]  Nebojsa S. Davcik,et al.  The use and misuse of structural equation modeling in management research: a review and critique , 2014 .

[98]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[99]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  On the Emancipation of PLS-SEM: A Commentary on Rigdon (2012) , 2014 .

[100]  Joan L. Luft,et al.  Subjectivity in Developing and Validating Causal Explanations in Positivist Accounting Research , 2014 .

[101]  T. Dijkstra.  Latent Variables and Indices: Herman Wold’s Basic Design and Partial Least Squares , 2010 .

[102]  Juha-Pekka Kallunki,et al.  Exploring the Relationships between Strategy, Innovation, and Management Control Systems: The Roles of Social Networking, Organic Innovative Culture, and Formal Controls , 2011 .

[103]  Maria Pia Maraghini,et al.  Chapman Christopher S., Hopwood Anthony G., Shields Michael D. (Eds.), “Handbook of Management Accounting Research”, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007, 1.137 pagine , 2008 .

[104]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[105]  Michael D. Shields.  Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s , 1997 .

[106]  Wynne W. Chin.  How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses , 2010 .

[107]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Customer Satisfaction with Commercial Airlines: The Role of Perceived Safety and Purpose of Travel , 2011 .

[108]  David Smith,et al.  Mentoring and turnover intentions in public accounting firms: a research note , 2009 .

[109]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Rethinking Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: In Praise of Simple Methods , 2012 .

[110]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  In Search of Management Accounting Theory , 2009 .

[111]  Habib Mahama,et al.  The Effect of Managers' Enabling Perceptions on Costing System Use, Psychological Empowerment, and Task Performance , 2013 .

[112]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Antecedents of participative budgeting , 1998 .

[113]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[114]  Carol Saunders,et al.  PLS: A Silver Bullet? , 2006 .

[115]  Sven Modell,et al.  Bridging the paradigm divide in management accounting research: The role of mixed methods approaches , 2010 .

[116]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  Leveraging Organizational Knowledge through Electronic Knowledge Repositories in Public Accounting Firms: An Empirical Investigation , 2011 .

[117]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[118]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[119]  Joan L. Luft,et al.  Zimmerman's contentious conjectures: describing the present and prescribing the future of empirical management accounting research , 2002 .

[120]  R. Chenhall.  Theorizing Contingencies in Management Control Systems Research , 2006 .

[121]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[122]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Incorporating Formative Measures into Covariance-Based Structural Equation Models , 2011, MIS Q..

[123]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Conjectures Regarding Empirical Managerial Accounting Research , 2001 .

[124]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Budgeting Research: Three Theoretical Perspectives and Criteria for Selective Integration , 2003 .

[125]  Margaret A. Abernethy,et al.  The Role of Performance Measures in the Intertemporal Decisions of Business Unit Managers , 2013 .

[126]  Mikko Rönkkö,et al.  A Critical Examination of Common Beliefs About Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2013 .

[127]  Christian Derquenne,et al.  A modified PLS path modeling algorithm handling reflective categorical variables and a new model building strategy , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[128]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[129]  Peter M Bentler,et al.  On Components, Latent Variables, PLS and Simple Methods: Reactions to Rigdon's Rethinking of PLS. , 2014, Long range planning.

[130]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[131]  Siegfried P. Gudergan,et al.  Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis in PLS Path Modeling , 2008 .

[132]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  Making management accounting research more useful , 2012 .

[133]  Kim Langfield-Smith,et al.  Structural equation modeling in management accounting research: critical analysis and opportunities , 2004 .

[134]  Sönke Albers,et al.  PLS and Success Factor Studies in Marketing , 2010 .

[135]  Wilhelm Hasselbring,et al.  Information system integration , 2000, CACM.

[136]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[137]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[138]  Mark A. Griffin,et al.  Refining individualized consideration: Distinguishing developmental leadership and supportive leadership , 2006 .

[139]  Victor S. Maas,et al.  The effects of uncertainty on the roles of controllers and budgets: an exploratory study , 2011 .

[140]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[141]  Rand R. Wilcox,et al.  How many discoveries have been lost by ignoring modern statistical methods , 1998 .

[142]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[143]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling , 2013, Comput. Stat..

[144]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  Fifty-Year Overview of Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting , 2011 .

[145]  Rainer Lueg,et al.  Differences in the Sophistication of Value-Based Management - The Role of Top Executives , 2013 .

[146]  Jean-François Henri,et al.  A quantitative assessment of the reporting of structural equation modeling information : the case of management accounting research , 2008 .

[147]  Carsten Homburg,et al.  Determinants of Contract Terms for Professional Services , 2009 .

[148]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[149]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics , 2011 .

[150]  Habib Mahama,et al.  Management control systems, cooperation and performance in strategic supply relationships: A survey in the mines , 2006 .

[151]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[152]  Herman Wold,et al.  Soft modelling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions , 1982 .

[153]  Matthew D. Hall,et al.  Do comprehensive performance measurement systems help or hinder managers' mental model development? , 2011 .

[154]  Straub,et al.  Editor's Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[155]  S. Mark Young,et al.  Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies , 2005 .

[156]  Frank G. H. Hartmann,et al.  Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research using moderated regression analysis: a second look , 2003 .

[157]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Silver Bullet or Voodoo Statistics? , 2009 .

[158]  Betty Vandenbosch,et al.  An empirical analysis of the association between the use of executive support systems and perceived organizational competitiveness , 1999 .

[159]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Proportional structural effects of formative indicators , 2008 .

[160]  Tenko Raykov,et al.  Bias of Coefficient afor Fixed Congeneric Measures with Correlated Errors , 2001 .

[161]  Christian Nitzl,et al.  Mediation Analysis in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Helping Researchers Discuss More Sophisticated Models , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[162]  Mohamed Z. Elbashir,et al.  The Role of Organizational Absorptive Capacity in Strategic Use of Business Intelligence to Support Integrated Management Control Systems , 2011 .

[163]  Jukka Ylitalo,et al.  PLS marker variable approach to diagnosing and controlling for method variance , 2011, ICIS.

[164]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2015, MIS Q..