Field calibration of electrochemical NO 2 sensors in a citizen science context

Abstract. In many urban areas the population is exposed to elevated levels of air pollution. However, real-time air quality is usually only measured at few locations. These measurements provide a general picture of the state of the air, but they are unable to monitor local differences. New low-cost sensor technology is available for several years now, and has the potential to extend official monitoring networks significantly even though the current generation of sensors suffer from various technical issues. Citizen science experiments based on these sensors must be designed carefully to avoid generation of data which is of poor or even useless quality. This study explores the added value of the 2016 Urban AirQ campaign, which focused on measuring nitrogen dioxide ( NO2 ) in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Sixteen low-cost air quality sensor devices were built and distributed among volunteers living close to roads with high traffic volume for a 2-month measurement period. Each electrochemical sensor was calibrated in-field next to an air monitoring station during an 8-day period, resulting in R2 ranging from 0.3 to 0.7. When temperature and relative humidity are included in a multilinear regression approach, the NO2 accuracy is improved significantly, with R2 ranging from 0.6 to 0.9. Recalibration after the campaign is crucial, as all sensors show a significant signal drift in the 2-month measurement period. The measurement series between the calibration periods can be corrected for after the measurement period by taking a weighted average of the calibration coefficients. Validation against an independent air monitoring station shows good agreement. Using our approach, the standard deviation of a typical sensor device for NO2 measurements was found to be 7  µg m−3 , provided that temperatures are below 30  ∘C . Stronger ozone titration on street sides causes an underestimation of NO2 concentrations, which 75 % of the time is less than 2.3  µg m−3 . Our findings show that citizen science campaigns using low-cost sensors based on the current generations of electrochemical NO2 sensors may provide useful complementary data on local air quality in an urban setting, provided that experiments are properly set up and the data are carefully analysed.

[1]  Michael L. Wheeler,et al.  Performance Evaluation and Community Application of Low-Cost Sensors for Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide , 2016, Sensors.

[2]  A. Lewis,et al.  Evaluating the performance of low cost chemical sensors for air pollution research. , 2016, Faraday discussions.

[3]  L. Shang,et al.  The next generation of low-cost personal air quality sensors for quantitative exposure monitoring , 2014 .

[4]  L. Spinelle,et al.  Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part A: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide (cid:2) , 2022 .

[5]  L. Morawska,et al.  The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. , 2015, Environment international.

[6]  Michael Hannigan,et al.  Quantification Method for Electrolytic Sensors in Long-Term Monitoring of Ambient Air Quality , 2015, Sensors.

[7]  U. Lerner,et al.  On the feasibility of measuring urban air pollution by wireless distributed sensor networks. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Manuel Aleixandre,et al.  Performance evaluation of amperometric sensors for the monitoring of O3 and NO2 in ambient air at ppb level , 2015 .

[9]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements , 2017 .

[10]  G. Hagler,et al.  Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States. , 2016, Atmospheric measurement techniques.

[11]  A. Lewis,et al.  Validate personal air-pollution sensors , 2016, Nature.

[12]  Giovanni Squillero,et al.  Increasing pattern recognition accuracy for chemical sensing by evolutionary based drift compensation , 2011, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  Gb Stewart,et al.  The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks , 2013 .

[14]  Jonathan E. Thompson,et al.  Crowd-sourced air quality studies: A review of the literature & portable sensors , 2016 .

[15]  Yun Xiang,et al.  Mobile sensor network noise reduction and recalibration using a Bayesian network , 2015 .

[16]  Laurent Francis,et al.  Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir joint exercise , 2016 .

[17]  J. Cape,et al.  The Use of Passive Diffusion Tubes for Measuring Concentrations of Nitrogen Dioxide in Air , 2009 .

[18]  A. Hierlemann,et al.  Higher-order Chemical Sensing , 2007 .

[19]  Jonas Meyer,et al.  Design of an ozone and nitrogen dioxide sensor unit and its long-term operation within a sensor network in the city of Zurich , 2017 .

[20]  Alastair C. Lewis,et al.  Electrochemical ozone sensors: A miniaturised alternative for ozone measurements in laboratory experiments and air-quality monitoring , 2017 .

[21]  Qijun Jiang,et al.  Citizen Sensing for Improved Urban Environmental Monitoring , 2016, J. Sensors.