How can we identify the optimal pacing site in the right ventricular septum? A simplified method applicable during the standard implanting procedure.

AIMS A short paced (p) QRS duration (d) can be a marker for selecting the most appropriate RV pacing site. Although this could be achieved by continual 12-Lead ECG monitoring, such a technique is not applicable during pacemaker (PM) implantation. The purpose of this study was to validate a method for identifying the optimal site for RV septum pacing using simple markers derived from few real-time ECG leads and fluoroscopy (F). METHODS AND RESULTS An overall of 304 measurements of pQRSd in different RV sites was performed in 102 patients undergoing PM implant. In accordance with F position the lead placement was classified high, medium, and low septum. Paced electrocardiographic/fluoroscopic parameters (q-wave/negative QRS in lead I, notching in limb leads, R/S wave in lead II, QRS precordial leads transition, and F septal segments pacing site) were analyzed to predict short pQRSd (≤ 160 ms). Logistic regression analysis showed that pQRSd > 160 ms was predicted by presence of pQRS notching in limb leads (OR = 3.24, p < 0.001), and with negative amplitude of QRS in lead II (OR = 2.53, p = 0.03). Short pQRSd (≤ 160 ms) was observed with mid F position (OR = 0.31, p < 0.001) and with the presence of a q-wave/negative QRS in lead I. CONCLUSION In RV septum pacing, simple QRS markers of few limb leads (lead I/II) added to F position are usefull to identifying the optimal site to place the RV lead.

[1]  H. Wellens,et al.  Radiological and electrocardiographic characterization of right ventricular outflow tract pacing. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  Ó. Cano,et al.  Comparison of effectiveness of right ventricular septal pacing versus right ventricular apical pacing. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  S. Barold,et al.  Variability of Left Ventricular Electromechanical Activation during Right Ventricular Pacing: Implications for the Selection of the Optimal Pacing Site , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  Yangang Su,et al.  Is Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Pacing Superior to Right Ventricular Apex Pacing in Patients with Normal Cardiac Function? , 2009, Clinical cardiology.

[5]  A. Ng,et al.  Long-term impact of right ventricular septal versus apical pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in patients with second- or third-degree heart block. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  R. Yee,et al.  Search for the Optimal Right Ventricular Pacing Site: Design and Implementation of Three Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trials , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  C. Lau,et al.  New‐Onset Heart Failure After Permanent Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients with Acquired High‐Grade Atrioventricular Block and Normal Left Ventricular Function , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  H. Mond,et al.  The Right Ventricular Outflow Tract: The Road to Septal Pacing , 2007, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  H. Mond,et al.  Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Pacing: Radiographic and Electrocardiographic Correlates of Lead Position , 2006, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  M. Sweeney,et al.  Heart Failure During Cardiac Pacing , 2006, Circulation.

[11]  J. Daubert,et al.  A Randomized Comparison of Permanent Septal Versus Apical Right Ventricular Pacing: Short‐Term Results , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[12]  T. Katagiri,et al.  Prolonged Paced QRS Duration as a Predictor for Congestive Heart Failure in Patients with Right Ventricular Apical Pacing , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  G. Lamas,et al.  Heart failure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRS duration. , 2005, Heart rhythm.

[14]  J. Twisk,et al.  Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: a quantitative review. , 2003, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Electrocardiographic Patterns of Superior Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Tachycardias: Distinguishing Septal and Free‐Wall Sites of Origin , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[16]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Optimal right ventricular pacing site in chronically implanted patients: a prospective randomized crossover comparison of apical and outflow tract pacing. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  G. Amit,et al.  Beneficial effects of right ventricular non-apical vs. apical pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  S. Barold,et al.  A new integrated approach to improve left ventricular electromechanical activation during right ventricular septal pacing. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  D. Shah,et al.  Utility of the surface electrocardiogram for confirming right ventricular septal pacing: validation using electroanatomical mapping. , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.