Primary care practitioner diagnostic action when the patient may have cancer: a vignette survey in 20 European countries
暂无分享,去创建一个
G. Dinant | H. Thulesius | B. Weltermann | E. Smyrnakis | A. Neves | P. Murchie | M. Brekke | M. Esteva | Davorina Petek | G. Foreva | J. Sawicka-Powierza | J. Azuri | Robert D. Hoffman | K. Buczkowski | S. Streit | T. Koskela | Michael Harris | M. Marzo-Castillejo | I. Aubin-Auger | N. Buono | S. Babić | Aida Puia | Gordon Taylor | P. Vedsted | D. Petek | Eva Jakob | Maria Petek Ster | Nicola Buono | R. Hoffman
[1] G. Dinant,et al. Identifying important health system factors that influence primary care practitioners’ referrals for cancer suspicion: a European cross-sectional survey , 2018, BMJ Open.
[2] M. Malmström,et al. It is important that the process goes quickly, isn't it?" A qualitative multi-country study of colorectal or lung cancer patients' narratives of the timeliness of diagnosis and quality of care. , 2018, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.
[3] G. Taylor,et al. How health system factors affect primary care practitioners’ decisions to refer patients for further investigation: protocol for a pan-European ecological study , 2018, BMC Health Services Research.
[4] Melissa Matz,et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries , 2018, The Lancet.
[5] M. McGrail,et al. Family effects on the rurality of GP’s work location: a longitudinal panel study , 2017, Human Resources for Health.
[6] J. Benneyan,et al. Timeliness of access to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment: A scoping literature review. , 2017, Lung cancer.
[7] P. Murchie,et al. A cancer geography paradox? Poorer cancer outcomes with longer travelling times to healthcare facilities despite prompter diagnosis and treatment: a data-linkage study , 2017, British Journal of Cancer.
[8] H. Thulesius,et al. How the probability of presentation to a primary care clinician correlates with cancer survival rates: a European survey using vignettes , 2017, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.
[9] Zerrin Aşan Greenacre,et al. The Importance of Selection Bias in Internet Surveys , 2016 .
[10] J. Hanprasertpong,et al. Longer waiting times for early stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy are associated with diminished long-term overall survival , 2015, Journal of gynecologic oncology.
[11] Jane M. Young,et al. Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey , 2015, BMJ Open.
[12] J. Emery,et al. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.
[13] K. Atkin,et al. Cancer detection in primary care: insights from general practitioners , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.
[14] Russell P. Harris,et al. Quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening: a systematic review of methods , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[15] S. Staniszewska,et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review , 2014, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.
[16] Jane M. Young,et al. Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions , 2014, BMC Family Practice.
[17] S. Pit,et al. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner’s survey response rates – a systematic review , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[18] Sandra Hollinghurst,et al. Preferences for cancer investigation: a vignette-based study of primary-care attendees. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.
[19] M. Coleman,et al. The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: an international collaboration to inform cancer policy in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. , 2013, Health policy.
[20] P. Gøtzsche,et al. Overestimated lead times in cancer screening has led to substantial underestimation of overdiagnosis , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.
[21] M. Frydenberg,et al. Evidence of increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals for five common cancers: a cohort study in primary care. , 2013, European journal of cancer.
[22] M. Coleman,et al. Stage at diagnosis and colorectal cancer survival in six high-income countries: A population-based study of patients diagnosed during 2000–2007 , 2013, Acta oncologica.
[23] A. Vanoli,et al. The prognostic role of time to diagnosis and presenting symptoms in patients with pancreatic cancer. , 2013, Cancer epidemiology.
[24] Bernard Rachet,et al. Lung cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK: a population-based study, 2004–2007 , 2013, Thorax.
[25] J. Wardle,et al. Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): do they contribute to differences in cancer survival? , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.
[26] Roger. T. Anderson,et al. Effect on survival of longer intervals between confirmed diagnosis and treatment initiation among low-income women with breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[27] I. Choi,et al. The influence of hospital volume and surgical treatment delay on long-term survival after cancer surgery. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[28] Aziz Sheikh,et al. Approaches to Recruiting 'Hard-To-Reach' Populations into Re-search: A Review of the Literature. , 2011, Health promotion perspectives.
[29] W. Treasure. Are the serious problems in cancer survival partly rooted in gatekeeper principles? , 2011, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[30] Gill Lawrence,et al. Evidence against the proposition that “UK cancer survival statistics are misleading”: simulation study with National Cancer Registry data , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[31] B Rachet,et al. Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data , 2011, Lancet.
[32] R. Neal. Commentary. Cancer diagnosis - the role of urgent referral guidelines. , 2010, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[33] D. Forman,et al. Cancer survival in England and the influence of early diagnosis: what can we learn from recent EUROCARE results? , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.
[34] M A Richards,et al. The size of the prize for earlier diagnosis of cancer in England , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.
[35] W. Hamilton,et al. The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.
[36] H. Møller,et al. A visual summary of the EUROCARE-4 results: a UK perspective , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.
[37] T. Peters,et al. Risk of ovarian cancer in women with symptoms in primary care: population based case-control study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[38] Margo C. Orchard,et al. Response Audit of an Internet Survey of Health Care Providers and Administrators: Implications for Determination of Response Rates , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.
[39] H. Storm,et al. [Cancer survival before and after initiating the Danish Cancer Control plan]. , 2008, Ugeskrift for laeger.
[40] Jeff Luck,et al. Measuring the Quality of Physician Practice by Using Clinical Vignettes: A Prospective Validation Study , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[41] R. Winkens,et al. Variation in test ordering behaviour of GPs: professional or context-related factors? , 2004, Family practice.
[42] E. Kumpusalo,et al. Does the doctors' professional experience reduce referral rates? Evidence from the Finnish referral study. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.
[43] C. Clancy,et al. Gatekeeping revisited--protecting patients from overtreatment. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.
[44] D. Wilkin,et al. Variation in general practitioners' referral rates to consultants. , 1987, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[45] H. Thulesius,et al. How health system factors influence referral decisions in patients that may have cancer: European symposium report , 2016 .
[46] G. Pond,et al. Impact of wait times on survival for women with uterine cancer. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[47] C. Hyde,et al. Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case-control study using electronic records. , 2014, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[48] M. Coleman,et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE--5-a population-based study. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.
[49] C. Foot,et al. How to improve cancer survival: Explaining England's relatively poor rates-The King's Fund, June 2011 , 2011 .
[50] M. Sant,et al. Survival for cancer patients in Europe. , 2009, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.
[51] R. Atkinson,et al. Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies , 2001 .
[52] D. Freedman. Ecological Inference and the Ecological Fallacy , 1999 .