Feasibility Study of Land Cover Classification Based on Normalized Difference Vegetation Index for Landslide Risk Assessment

Unfavorable land cover leads to excessive damage from landslides and other natural hazards, whereas the presence of vegetation is expected to mitigate rainfall-induced landslide potential. Hence, unexpected and rapid changes in land cover due to deforestation would be detrimental in landslide-prone areas. Also, vegetation cover is subject to phenological variations and therefore, timely classification of land cover is an essential step in effective evaluation of landslide hazard potential. The work presented here investigates methods that can be used for land cover classification based on the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), derived from up-to-date satellite images, and the feasibility of application in landslide risk prediction. A major benefit of this method would be the eventual ability to employ NDVI as a stand-alone parameter for accurate assessment of the impact of land cover in landslide hazard evaluation. An added benefit would be the timely detection of undesirable practices such as deforestation using satellite imagery. A landslide-prone region in Oregon, USA is used as a model for the application of the classification method. Five selected classification techniques—k-nearest neighbor, Gaussian support vector machine (GSVM), artificial neural network, decision tree and quadratic discriminant analysis support the viability of the NDVI-based land cover classification. Finally, its application in landslide risk evaluation is demonstrated.

[1]  Saro Lee,et al.  Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis , 2005 .

[2]  S. Beguería,et al.  Changes in land cover and shallow landslide activity: a case study in the Spanish Pyrenees , 2006 .

[3]  R. Ray,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping using downscaled AMSR-E soil moisture: A case study from Cleveland Corral, California, US , 2010 .

[4]  K. M. Weerasinghe,et al.  Upgrading of the subjective landslide hazard evaluation scheme in Sri Lanka , 2011 .

[5]  Nedret Billor,et al.  Comparison of standard maximum likelihood classification and polytomous logistic regression used in remote sensing , 2013 .

[6]  John C. Davis,et al.  Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA , 2003 .

[7]  Jennifer M. Jacobs,et al.  Relationships among remotely sensed soil moisture, precipitation and landslide events , 2007 .

[8]  J. Townshend,et al.  NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale , 1994 .

[9]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  The Influence of Land Use Change on Landslide Susceptibility Zonation: The Briga Catchment Test Site (Messina, Italy) , 2013, Environmental Management.

[10]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[11]  C. Brodley,et al.  Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data , 1997 .

[12]  Suming Jin,et al.  Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States – Representing a Decade of Land Cover Change Information , 2015 .

[13]  Xiaoxia Wang,et al.  Land Cover Classification of Landsat Data with Phenological Features Extracted from Time Series MODIS NDVI Data , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[14]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focussing on different training sites. , 2009 .

[15]  Jidong Yang,et al.  Modeling crack deterioration of flexible pavements : Comparison of recurrent Markov chains and artificial neural networks , 2006 .

[16]  E. George Robison,et al.  Oregon Department of Forestry Storm Impacts and Landslides of 1996: Final Report , 1999 .

[17]  C. Gokceoğlu,et al.  Effects of land-use changes on landslides in a landslide-prone area (Ardesen, Rize, NE Turkey) , 2009, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[18]  Matthias Jakob,et al.  The impacts of logging on landslide activity at Clayoquot Sound, British Columbia , 2000 .

[19]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification , 2005, NIPS.

[20]  K. M. Weerasinghe.  Application of fuzzy sets and other statistical techniques in landslide hazard zonation mapping , 2011 .

[21]  L. S. Davis,et al.  An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classi(cid:142) cation , 2002 .

[22]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The status of agricultural lands in Egypt: The use of multitemporal NDVI features derived from landsat TM☆ , 1996 .

[23]  T. Kavzoglu,et al.  Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela , 2005 .

[24]  W. Wagner,et al.  Evaluation of the ESA CCI soil moisture product using ground-based observations , 2015 .