"It's not black and white": Public health researchers' and ethics committees' perceptions of engaging research participants online

The internet offers an opportunity for researchers to engage participants in research in a cost-effective and timely manner. Yet the use of the internet as a research tool (internet research) comes with a range of ethical concerns, and the rapidly changing online environment poses challenges for both researchers and ethics committees. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the key ethical issues of using the internet to recruit, retain and trace participants in public health research, from the perspectives of researchers and human research ethics committee (HREC) members.,This study employed a qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with eight public health researchers and seven HREC members in Australia to explore the key ethical issues of using the internet to engage research participants.,The study identified commonalities between researchers and HREC members regarding the utility and ethical complexity of using the internet to recruit, retain and trace research participants. The need for guidance and support regarding internet research, for both groups, was highlighted, as well as the need for flexibility and responsiveness in formal ethical processes.,This research contributes to the understanding of how the internet is used to engage participants in public health research and the ethical context in which that occurs. Supporting the ethical conduct of internet research will benefit those involved in research, including researchers, HRECs, organisations and research participants.

[1]  Espen Røysamb,et al.  Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[2]  D. Rosenthal,et al.  Human Research Ethics in Practice , 2009, Monash bioethics review.

[3]  David M. Berry,et al.  Internet research: privacy, ethics and alienation: an open source approach , 2004, Internet Res..

[4]  Sandra L. Bell,et al.  Attrition in longitudinal studies: who do you lose? , 2006, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[5]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  The Ethics of Internet Research , 2008 .

[6]  T. Buchanan,et al.  Ethics Guidelines for Internet-mediated Research , 2013 .

[7]  Fabiola Baltar,et al.  Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook , 2012, Internet Res..

[8]  R. Spoth,et al.  Modeling Factors Influencing Enrollment in Family-Focused Preventive Intervention Research , 2000, Prevention Science.

[9]  Megan A. Moreno,et al.  Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  D. Babcock,et al.  The Use of Technology in Participant Tracking and Study Retention: Lessons Learned from A Clinical Trials Network Study , 2015, Substance abuse.

[11]  B. Bonevski,et al.  Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[12]  Nicola F. Johnson,et al.  Silences of ethical practice: dilemmas for researchers using social media , 2013 .

[13]  M. McFarlane,et al.  Recruitment and retention of an online sample for an HIV prevention intervention targeting men who have sex with men: the smart sex quest project , 2004, AIDS care.

[14]  S. Schneider,et al.  Facebook as a tool for respondent tracing , 2015 .

[15]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Reducing Longitudinal Attrition Through Facebook , 2015 .

[16]  M. Banaji,et al.  Psychological. , 2015, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[17]  L. Calderwood Tracking sample members in longitudinal studies , 2012 .

[18]  Joel R. Evans,et al.  The value of online surveys , 2005, Internet Res..

[19]  R. Mychasiuk,et al.  Facebook: an effective tool for participant retention in longitudinal research. , 2012, Child: care, health and development.

[20]  R. Loeber,et al.  Innovative Retention Methods in Longitudinal Research: A Case Study of the Developmental Trends Study , 2002 .

[21]  P. Batterham,et al.  Recruiting for health, medical or psychosocial research using Facebook: Systematic review , 2016, Internet interventions.

[22]  Annette N. Markham,et al.  Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Version 2.0 Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee , 2012 .

[23]  M. Toledano,et al.  How to Establish and Follow up a Large Prospective Cohort Study in the 21st Century - Lessons from UK COSMOS , 2015, PloS one.

[24]  S. Gosling,et al.  Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. , 2015, The American psychologist.

[25]  Stacey Hokke,et al.  Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review , 2018, PloS one.

[26]  Tamsin Ford,et al.  Ethical practice in internet research involving vulnerable people: lessons from a self-harm discussion forum study (SharpTalk) , 2011, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[27]  Deborah Loxton,et al.  Recruiting online: lessons from a longitudinal survey of contraception and pregnancy intentions of young Australian women. , 2015, American journal of epidemiology.

[28]  J. Hunt,et al.  Retaining and tracking cohort study members. , 1998, Epidemiologic reviews.

[29]  M. Brecht,et al.  Using Facebook to Maximize Follow-Up Response Rates in a Longitudinal Study of Adults Who Use Methamphetamine , 2012, Substance abuse : research and treatment.

[30]  J. Byles,et al.  Online and Offline Recruitment of Young Women for a Longitudinal Health Survey: Findings From the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health 1989-95 Cohort , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  R. DiClemente,et al.  Factors Associated With Testing for Hepatitis C in an Internet-Recruited Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men , 2001, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[32]  E. Buchanan,et al.  Online Survey Tools: Ethical and Methodological Concerns of Human Research Ethics Committees , 2009, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[33]  S. Galea,et al.  Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. , 2007, Annals of epidemiology.

[34]  Lisa Gibbs,et al.  Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis , 2007, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[35]  Elizabeth Buchanan,et al.  Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues , 2009, CSOC.

[36]  Izaak L Williams,et al.  Web-based tracking methods in longitudinal studies. , 2014, Evaluation and program planning.

[37]  David G. Schwartz The Internet in six words or less , 2010, Internet Res..