Clustering Algorithms and Validation Indices for mmWave Radio Multipath Propagation

Transmissions in the mmWave spectrum benefit from a-priori knowledge of radio channel propagation models. This paper is concerned with one important task that helps provide a more accurate channel model, namely, the clustering of all multipath components arriving at the receiver. Our work focuses on directive transmissions in urban outdoor scenarios and shows the importance of the correct estimation of the number of clusters for mmWave radio channels simulated with a software ray-tracer tool. We investigate the effectiveness of k-means and k-power-means clustering algorithms in predicting the number of clusters through the use of cluster validity indices (CVIs) and score fusion techniques. Our investigation shows that clustering is a difficult task because the optimal number of clusters is not always given by one or by a combination of more CVIs. However, using score fusion methods, we find the optimal partitioning for the k-means algorithm based on the power and time of arrival of the multipath rays or based on their angle of arrival. When the k-power-means algorithm is used, the power of each arriving ray is the most important clustering factor, making the dominant received paths pull the other ones around them, to form a cluster. Thus, the number of clusters is smaller and the decision based on CVIs or score fusion factors easier to be taken.

[1]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  On mm-Wave Multipath Clustering and Channel Modeling , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[2]  Fernando Perez-Fontan,et al.  Estimation of the Number of Clusters in Multipath Radio Channel Data Sets , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[3]  Ujjwal Maulik,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Some Clustering Algorithms and Validity Indices , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[5]  Olatz Arbelaitz,et al.  An extensive comparative study of cluster validity indices , 2013, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Ernst Bonek,et al.  Improving clustering performance using multipath component distance , 2006 .

[7]  Greg Hamerly,et al.  Alternatives to the k-means algorithm that find better clusterings , 2002, CIKM '02.

[8]  D. Shutin Cluster analysis of wireless channel impulse responses , 2004, International Zurich Seminar on Communications, 2004.

[9]  Donald W. Bouldin,et al.  A Cluster Separation Measure , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Krzysztof Kryszczuk,et al.  Estimation of the Number of Clusters Using Multiple Clustering Validity Indices , 2010, MCS.

[11]  Ruiyuan Tian,et al.  Tracking Time-Variant Cluster Parameters in MIMO Channel Measurements , 2007, 2007 Second International Conference on Communications and Networking in China.

[12]  Ujjwal Maulik,et al.  Validity index for crisp and fuzzy clusters , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  André Hardy,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set , 1994 .

[14]  J. C. Dunn,et al.  A Fuzzy Relative of the ISODATA Process and Its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters , 1973 .

[15]  T. Caliński,et al.  A dendrite method for cluster analysis , 1974 .

[16]  Martine Lienard,et al.  Impact of clustering at mmW band frequencies , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting.

[17]  Ernst Bonek,et al.  A Framework for Automatic Clustering of Parametric MIMO Channel Data Including Path Powers , 2006, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[18]  Gerardo Beni,et al.  A Validity Measure for Fuzzy Clustering , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Some new indexes of cluster validity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.