Validation of a larval zebrafish locomotor assay for assessing the seizure liability of early-stage development drugs.

INTRODUCTION Seizure liability is an adverse property of new candidate drugs typically detected only in later stage pre-clinical safety studies. Consequently, pharmaceutical discovery needs small scale (microplate-based), rapid throughput screens to 'front-load' such adverse endpoints in order to reduce associated attrition rates. Of the potential methods available, previously published studies have shown that the quantification of seizure-associated locomotion in the larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) offers high potential for development into such a screen. Here, we present methodology and validation data (on 25 compounds) from a larval zebrafish (Zf) convulsant assay, based on the quantification of high speed locomotion after exposure to a range of test compounds. METHODS All assays were undertaken in 7 days post fertilization (dpf), WIK-strain Zf larvae, at 27+/-1 degrees C. The blinded validation test set consisted of 17 positive and 8 negative controls, based on literature evidence for seizure liability. Initially, a Maximum Tolerated Concentration (MTC) assay was undertaken on each compound to identify the maximum concentration not causing general toxicity, sedation or overt neuromuscular effects. Next, the convulsant assay was undertaken on 5 concentrations from the MTC down, plus a dilution water control. Exposed larvae were videotracked for 1 h, using the Viewpoint Videotrack for Zebrafish system, and high speed movements, typically associated with seizure-like locomotor activity, were quantified. RESULTS According to classification criteria proposed by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM), the data generated appeared to offer "sufficient" predictivity (72% overall), particularly considering the potential for throughput and likely positioning within a safety pharmacology front-loading screening cascade. DISCUSSION Possible reasons for the misclassifications are discussed, and potential improvements to increase sensitivity and specificity outlined. In all, these initial validation data suggest that this assay offers potential as a medium throughput screen aimed at the early drug discovery detection of this complex safety pharmacological endpoint.

[1]  J. Wille,et al.  Several Different Ion Channel Modulators Abrogate Contact Hypersensitivity in Mice , 1999, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[2]  D. W. Smith,et al.  Severe metabolic acidosis after acute naproxen sodium ingestion. , 1989, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  J. Jefferson,et al.  Bupropion for major depressive disorder: Pharmacokinetic and formulation considerations. , 2005, Clinical therapeutics.

[4]  K. Keller,et al.  Toxicological testing handbook : principles, applications, and data interpretation , 2006 .

[5]  I. Langmoen,et al.  Epileptogenic effect of antibiotic drugs. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  Paul Goldsmith,et al.  Zebrafish as a pharmacological tool: the how, why and when. , 2004, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[7]  Ralf Regenthal,et al.  Drug Levels: Therapeutic and Toxic Serum/Plasma Concentrations of Common Drugs , 1999, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[8]  C. Ton,et al.  The use of zebrafish for assessing ototoxic and otoprotective agents , 2005, Hearing Research.

[9]  Patricia McGrath,et al.  Zebrafish: a preclinical model for drug screening. , 2002, Assay and drug development technologies.

[10]  A. Camm,et al.  Relationships between preclinical cardiac electrophysiology, clinical QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes for a broad range of drugs: evidence for a provisional safety margin in drug development. , 2003, Cardiovascular research.

[11]  T. Hutchinson,et al.  Validation of the use of zebrafish larvae in visual safety assessment. , 2008, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[12]  E. Hess,et al.  L-type calcium channels contribute to the tottering mouse dystonic episodes. , 1999, Molecular pharmacology.

[13]  A. Roach,et al.  Zebrafish offer the potential for a primary screen to identify a wide variety of potential anticonvulsants , 2007, Epilepsy Research.

[14]  S. Baraban,et al.  A Large‐scale Mutagenesis Screen to Identify Seizure‐resistant Zebrafish , 2007, Epilepsia.

[15]  P. Popoli,et al.  Cromakalim (BRL 34915) counteracts the epileptiform activity elicited by diltiazem and verapamil in rats , 1991, British journal of pharmacology.

[16]  C. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Stability of benzylpenicillin during continuous home intravenous therapy. , 2004, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[17]  Sean C. Sweetman,et al.  Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference , 1999 .

[18]  Roger L. Black,et al.  Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics , 1991 .

[19]  Sarah Ross,et al.  Bupropion: risks and benefits , 2005, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[20]  T. Cooper,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of bupropion and metabolites in plasma and brain of rats, mice, and guinea pigs. , 1986, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[21]  D. Passal,et al.  Verapamil poisoning in an infant. , 1984, Pediatrics.

[22]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  Zebrafish assays for drug toxicity screening , 2006, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[23]  W. Stigelman,et al.  Goodman and Gilman's the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics , 1986 .

[24]  A Messori,et al.  Clinical Features, Pathogenesis and Management of Drug-Induced Seizures , 1990, Drug safety.

[25]  M. Leider Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics , 1985 .

[26]  Michael R. Taylor,et al.  Pentylenetetrazole induced changes in zebrafish behavior, neural activity and c-fos expression , 2005, Neuroscience.

[27]  U. Langheinrich,et al.  Zebrafish: a new model on the pharmaceutical catwalk. , 2003, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[28]  T. Hutchinson,et al.  Culturing of fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas L.) larvae for aquatic toxicity testing: An observational note , 1994 .

[29]  Massimo Avoli,et al.  Rat subicular networks gate hippocampal output activity in an in vitro model of limbic seizures , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  A. Goossens,et al.  Contact and photocontact allergy to ketoprofen. The Belgian experience , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[31]  Sten Grillner,et al.  Endogenous dopaminergic modulation of the lamprey spinal locomotor network , 2003, Brain Research.

[32]  E. Beghi,et al.  Epileptogenic drugs: a systematic review , 2006, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[33]  Aldert Piersma,et al.  The ECVAM International Validation Study on In Vitro Embryotoxicity Tests: Results of the Definitive Phase and Evaluation of Prediction Models , 2002, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[34]  M. Carvan,et al.  Strain-dependent effects of developmental ethanol exposure in zebrafish. , 2004, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[35]  Modulation of swimming in the lamprey, Petromyzon marinus, by serotonergic and dopaminergic drugs , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  J. Wold,et al.  Effect of Cefamandole Nafate on the Toxicity of Tobramycin , 1977, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[37]  A. Namiki,et al.  The Anticonvulsant Action of Propofol on Epileptiform Activity in Rat Hippocampal Slices , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[38]  R. Kast,et al.  Bupropion: pharmacology and therapeutic applications , 2006, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.