Efficient Removal Lemmas for Matrices

It was recently proved in Alon et al. ( 2017 ) that any hereditary property of two-dimensional matrices (where the row and column order is not ignored) over a finite alphabet is testable with a constant number of queries, by establishing the following ordered matrix removal lemma: For any finite alphabet Γ, any hereditary property P $\mathcal {P}$ of matrices over Γ, and any 𝜖 > 0, there exists f P ( 𝜖 ) $f_{\mathcal {P}}(\epsilon )$ such that for any matrix M over Γ that is 𝜖 -far from satisfying P $\mathcal {P}$ , most of the f P ( 𝜖 ) × f P ( 𝜖 ) $f_{\mathcal {P}}(\epsilon ) \times f_{\mathcal {P}}(\epsilon )$ submatrices of M do not satisfy P $\mathcal {P}$ . Here being 𝜖 -far from P $\mathcal {P}$ means that one needs to modify at least an 𝜖 -fraction of the entries of M to make it satisfy P $\mathcal {P}$ . However, in the above general removal lemma, f P ( 𝜖 ) $f_{\mathcal {P}}(\epsilon )$ grows very quickly as a function of 𝜖 − 1 , even when P $\mathcal {P}$ is characterized by a single forbidden submatrix. In this work we establish much more efficient removal lemmas for several special cases of the above problem. In particular, we show the following, which can be seen as an efficient binary matrix analogue of the triangle removal lemma: For any fixed s × t binary matrix A and any 𝜖 > 0 there exists δ > 0 polynomial in 𝜖 , such that for any binary matrix M in which less than a δ -fraction of the s × t submatrices are equal to A , there exists a set of less than an 𝜖 -fraction of the entries of M that intersects every copy of A in M . We generalize the work of Alon et al. ( 2007 ) and make progress towards proving one of their conjectures. The proofs combine their efficient conditional regularity lemma for matrices with additional combinatorial and probabilistic ideas.

[1]  Jacob Fox,et al.  A new proof of the graph removal lemma , 2010, ArXiv.

[2]  Ronitt Rubinfeld,et al.  Robust Characterizations of Polynomials with Applications to Program Testing , 1996, SIAM J. Comput..

[3]  Noga Alon,et al.  Regular Languages are Testable with a Constant Number of Queries , 2000, SIAM J. Comput..

[4]  Noga Alon,et al.  Testing Hereditary Properties of Ordered Graphs and Matrices , 2017, 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[5]  Dana Ron,et al.  Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation , 1998, JACM.

[6]  Daniel Reichman,et al.  Deleting and Testing Forbidden Patterns in Multi-Dimensional Arrays , 2017, ICALP.

[7]  B. Szegedy,et al.  Regularity Partitions and The Topology of Graphons , 2010, 1002.4377.

[8]  Noga Alon,et al.  Easily Testable Graph Properties , 2015, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing.

[9]  Madhu Sudan Invariance in Property Testing , 2010, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[10]  F. Behrend On Sets of Integers Which Contain No Three Terms in Arithmetical Progression. , 1946, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Terence Tao A variant of the hypergraph removal lemma , 2006, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[12]  Vojtech Rödl,et al.  Regularity Lemma for k‐uniform hypergraphs , 2004, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[13]  Eldar Fischer,et al.  Earthmover Resilience and Testing in Ordered Structures , 2018, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[14]  Yuichi Yoshida,et al.  Limits of Ordered Graphs and Images , 2018, ArXiv.

[15]  Noga Alon Testing subgraphs in large graphs , 2002, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[16]  David Conlon,et al.  Bounds for graph regularity and removal lemmas , 2011, ArXiv.

[17]  W. T. Gowers,et al.  A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem , 2001 .

[18]  Noga Alon,et al.  Efficient Testing of Large Graphs , 2000, Comb..

[19]  Vojtech Rödl,et al.  The Algorithmic Aspects of the Regularity Lemma , 1994, J. Algorithms.

[20]  Noga Alon,et al.  A Characterization of the (Natural) Graph Properties Testable with One-Sided Error , 2008, SIAM J. Comput..

[21]  Eldar Fischer,et al.  Lower bounds for testing forbidden induced substructures in bipartite-graph-like combinatorial objects , 2007, APPROX-RANDOM.

[22]  V. Rödl,et al.  The counting lemma for regular k-uniform hypergraphs , 2006 .

[23]  Asaf Shapira,et al.  Removal lemmas with polynomial bounds , 2016, STOC.

[24]  Noga Alon,et al.  A characterization of easily testable induced subgraphs , 2004, SODA '04.

[25]  Noga Alon,et al.  Efficient Testing of Bipartite Graphs for Forbidden Induced Subgraphs , 2007, SIAM J. Comput..

[26]  Eldar Fischer,et al.  Testing of matrix-poset properties , 2007, Comb..