Automated video enhancement from a stream of atmospherically-distorted images: the lucky-region fusion approach

An automated video enhancement technique capable of image fusion from a stream of randomly-distorted images of a still scene is presented in this paper. The technique is based on the "lucky-region" fusion (LRF) approach and aims to improve locally the image quality according to the following steps: (1) for each image of the video stream an image quality map (IQM) which characterizes locally the image quality is computed, (2) each IQM is compared to that of the current fused image leading to the selection of best quality regions (the "lucky-regions"), and (3) the selected regions are merged into the fused video stream. While the LRF approach succeeds in producing images with significantly improved image quality compared to the source images, its performance depends on the imaging conditions and requires adjustment of its fusion parameter - the fusion kernel size - in order to adapt to an evolving environment (e.g. a turbulent atmosphere). Parameter selection was so far performed manually using a trial-and-error approach which causes the technique to be impractical for a real world implementation. The automated LRF technique presented is relaxed from this requirement and selects automatically the fusion parameter based on the analysis of the source images making it more suitable for practical systems. The improved LRF technique is applied to imaging through atmospheric turbulence for various imaging conditions and scenes of interest. In each case automatically-fused video streams demonstrate increases in image quality comparable to that obtained with manual selection of the fusion parameter.

[1]  R. Muller,et al.  Real-time correction of atmospherically degraded telescope images through image sharpening , 1974 .

[2]  M A Vorontsov,et al.  Anisoplanatic imaging through turbulent media: image recovery by local information fusion from a set of short-exposure images. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  D. Fried Probability of getting a lucky short-exposure image through turbulence* , 1978 .

[4]  D. Fried Anisoplanatism in adaptive optics , 1982 .

[5]  Christine Pohl,et al.  Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications , 1998 .

[6]  D. Leckie Synergism of synthetic aperture radar and visible/infrared data for forest type discrimination. , 1990 .

[7]  Vladimir Petrovic,et al.  Objective image fusion performance measure , 2000 .

[8]  B. Welsh,et al.  Imaging Through Turbulence , 1996 .

[9]  S. John,et al.  Multiframe selective information fusion from robust error estimation theory , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  David L. Fried,et al.  Statistics of a Geometric Representation of Wavefront Distortion: Errata , 1965 .

[11]  Jong-Hyun Park,et al.  Comparison of four different methods to fuse multi-sensor and multi-resolution remotely sensed data for urban topographic mapping , 1999, IEEE 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS'99 (Cat. No.99CH36293).

[12]  C. Morandi,et al.  Registration of Translated and Rotated Images Using Finite Fourier Transforms , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  A. Lambert,et al.  Atmospheric turbulence visualization with wide-area motion-blur restoration , 1999 .

[14]  Wenzhong Shi,et al.  Multisource Image Fusion Method Using Support Value Transform , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Mikhail A. Vorontsov,et al.  Image enhancement by local information fusion with pre-processing and composed metric , 2008, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[16]  P Scheunders,et al.  Fusion and merging of multispectral images with use of multiscale fundamental forms. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  Mikhail A. Vorontsov,et al.  Atmospheric laser optics testbed (A_LOT): atmospheric propagation characterization, beam control, and imaging results , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[18]  S. Sides,et al.  Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data: Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic , 1991 .

[19]  M A Vorontsov,et al.  Synthetic imaging: nonadaptive anisoplanatic image correction in atmospheric turbulence. , 1998, Optics letters.

[20]  G. C. Cox,et al.  Diffraction-limited 800 nm imaging with the 2.56 m Nordic Optical Telescope , 2001, astro-ph/0101408.

[21]  Ivor W. Tsang,et al.  Fusing images with different focuses using support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[22]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Multisource classification of remotely sensed data: fusion of Landsat TM and SAR images , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  V. Karathanassi,et al.  A comparison study on fusion methods using evaluation indicators , 2007 .

[24]  Fabio Caparrelli,et al.  Vision-based closed-loop control of mobile microrobots for microhandling tasks , 2001, Optics East.

[25]  Andrew Lambert,et al.  Wide-area image restoration using a new iterative registration method , 2000, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[26]  Mikhail A. Vorontsov Parallel image processing based on an evolution equation with anisotropic gain: integrated optoelectronic architectures , 1999 .

[27]  Brian J. Thelen,et al.  Fine-resolution imagery of extended objects observed through volume turbulence using phase-diverse speckle , 1999, Optics + Photonics.

[28]  Michael C. Roggemann,et al.  Image-spectrum signal-to-noise-ratio improvements by statistical frame selection for adaptive-optics imaging through atmospheric turbulence , 1994 .

[29]  D. Yocky Image merging and data fusion by means of the discrete two-dimensional wavelet transform , 1995 .