When Is Honesty The Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism

Prior research suggests that consumers evaluate firms more negatively if they attribute the firm's business practices to firm-serving motivations rather than to motivations that serve the public good. The authors propose an alternative hypothesis: firm-serving attributions lower evaluation of the firm only when they are inconsistent with the firm's expressed motive. As such, the negative effect of consumer skepticism regarding a firm's motives can be inhibited by public acknowledgment of the strategic benefits to the firm. The power of this inhibition procedure was demonstrated in an experiment that manipulated the salience of firm-serving benefits and the firm's publicly stated motive. Consumer evaluation of the sponsoring firm was lowest in conditions when firm-serving benefits were salient and the firm outwardly stated purely public-serving motives. This experiment also revealed that the potential negative effects of skepticism were the most pronounced when individuals engaged in causal attribution prior to company evaluation. Finally, this study measured the different effects on attribution and evaluation of two distinct forms of skepticism: situational skepticism--a momentary state of distrust of an actor's motivations--and dispositional skepticism--an individual's ongoing tendency to be suspicious of other people's motives.

[1]  P. Murphy,et al.  Corporate Societal Marketing , 2001 .

[2]  M. Forehand.  Extending overjustification: the effect of perceived reward-giver intention on response to rewards. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Gregory T. Gundlach,et al.  Handbook of Marketing and Society , 2000 .

[4]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix? , 2000 .

[5]  Amna Kirmani,et al.  Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent , 2000 .

[6]  Terry Bristol,et al.  Socialization and Adolescents' Skepticism toward Advertising , 1998 .

[7]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned , 1998 .

[8]  Eric R. Spangenberg,et al.  Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism Toward Advertising , 1998 .

[9]  A. Andreasen,et al.  Profits for nonprofits: find a corporate partner. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[10]  Minette E. Drumwright,et al.  Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria , 1996 .

[11]  Neeli Bendapudi,et al.  Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning , 1996 .

[12]  Margaret C. Campbell.  When Attention-Getting Advertising Tactics Elicit Consumer Inferences of Manipulative Intent: The Importance of Balancing Benefits and Investments , 1995 .

[13]  John E. Calfee,et al.  The 70% Majority: Enduring Consumer Beliefs about Advertising , 1994 .

[14]  Gregory M. Rose,et al.  Adolescent Skepticism toward TV Advertising and Knowledge of Advertiser Tactics , 1994 .

[15]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[16]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  An Integrative Framework for Understanding Two-sided Persuasion , 1994 .

[17]  Craig Smith.  The new corporate philanthropy , 1994 .

[18]  John L. Swasy,et al.  Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information , 1990 .

[19]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context , 1989 .

[20]  J. Craig Andrews,et al.  The Dimensionality of Beliefs toward Advertising in General , 1989 .

[21]  V. Folkes.  Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions , 1988 .

[22]  E. E. Jones.  Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[23]  H. Kelley.  Attribution in social interaction. , 1987 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  B. Weiner,et al.  Spontaneous" causal thinking. , 1985 .

[26]  D. L. Kanter,et al.  CYNICISM AND ALIENATION AS MARKETING CONSIDERATIONS: SOME NEW WAYS TO APPROACH THE FEMALE CONSUMER , 1985 .

[27]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[28]  R. Hastie.  Causes and effects of causal attribution , 1984 .

[29]  Paul T. P. Wong,et al.  When people ask "why" questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. , 1981 .

[30]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[31]  William B. Locander,et al.  Attribution Theory and Advertising Effectiveness , 1980 .

[32]  A. Kruglanski.  The endogenous-exogenous partition in attribution theory. , 1975 .

[33]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[34]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .