Modifying Trust Dynamics through Cooperation and Defection in Evolving Social Networks

We present a model of social network that shows a dynamic emergent behavior simulating actors that exchange knowledge based on their preferences, expertise and friendship relations. The network presents a stochastic interaction behavior that tends to create communities, driven by the assortative mixing and triadic closures. Our first research goal is to investigate the features driving the formation of communities and their characteristics under different configurations of the network. In particular we focus on trust which we analyze qualitatively as dependent on the frequency and pattern of interactions. To this aim, we ran simulations of different network configurations and analyzed the resulting statistics. The second research goal is to study the effects of node deception and cooperation on the social network behavior; our primary metric is trust and we evaluated how, under specific conditions, it is possible to manipulate trust in some non trivial ways.

[1]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[2]  Stefano Battiston,et al.  A model of a trust-based recommendation system on a social network , 2006, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[3]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Newman,et al.  Why social networks are different from other types of networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Clark D. Thomborson.  Axiomatic and Behavioural Trust , 2010, TRUST.

[6]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing Patterns and Community Structure in Networks , 2002, cond-mat/0210146.

[7]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[8]  M Girvan,et al.  Structure of growing social networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Cooperation in Evolving Social Networks , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[10]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Email as spectroscopy: automated discovery of community structure within organizations , 2003 .

[12]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  The Structure and Dynamics of Networks: (Princeton Studies in Complexity) , 2006 .

[13]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Networks , 2009 .

[14]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[15]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks , 2009, TWEB.

[16]  R Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Dynamical and correlation properties of the internet. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[17]  B Skyrms,et al.  A dynamic model of social network formation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Francisco C. Santos,et al.  Cooperation Prevails When Individuals Adjust Their Social Ties , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Bandwidth and Echo: Trust, Information, and Gossip in Social Networks , 2001 .

[20]  S. Strogatz.  Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[21]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[22]  Beom Jun Kim,et al.  Attack vulnerability of complex networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.