Inhibition of return in averaging saccades

Abstract. When subjects make a quick saccade to one of two stimuli that are presented closely and simultaneously in the peripheral visual field, their eyes often land at a midpoint somewhere between the stimuli (saccadic averaging). The present study investigates whether and how the inhibition-of-return phenomenon (IOR; slower reaction times for the previously attended locations) influences spatial parameters of averaging saccades. Subjects were asked to quickly move their eyes toward one of two stimuli that were presented closely and simultaneously. Most subjects showed a clear tendency toward saccadic averaging. When an uninformative cue was presented 600 ms before the two stimuli (long enough to produce IOR), saccadic averaging still occurred but the saccade landing locations were biased toward the uncued location. Thus, the present study demonstrates that the mechanisms responsible for IOR affect the metrics of averaging saccades and suggests that IOR can be manifested not only in the temporal aspects but also in the spatial aspects of oculomotor behaviors.

[1]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Parietal lobe mechanisms for directed visual attention. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  P. Siple,et al.  Spatial constraints on the voluntary control of attention across visual space. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  J. Pratt,et al.  Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  E Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of eccentric forms. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Effects of spatial attention on directional manual and ocular responses , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  R A Abrams,et al.  Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  F. Ottes,et al.  Metrics of saccade responses to visual double stimuli: Two different modes , 1984, Vision Research.

[11]  Peter H. Schiller,et al.  Paired stimulation of the frontal eye fields and the superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey , 1979, Brain Research.

[12]  H. Deubel ADAPTIVITY OF GAIN AND DIRECTION IN OBLIQUE SACCADES1 , 1987 .

[13]  R. Klein,et al.  Splitting versus sharing focal attention: comment on Castiello and Umiltà (1992). , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: Implications for “center-of-gravity” tendencies , 1989, Vision Research.

[15]  R. Rafal,et al.  Effects of inhibition of return on voluntary and visually guided saccades. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[16]  Elizabeth A. Maylor,et al.  Components of orienting in visual space , 1983 .

[17]  J. Pratt,et al.  Inhibition of return in a discrimination task , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Stimulus-driven facilitation and inhibition of visual information processing in environmental and retinotopic representations of space. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Monkey posterior parietal cortex neurons antidromically activated from superior colliculus. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  P S Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Callosal and intrahemispheric connectivity of the prefrontal association cortex in rhesus monkey: Relation between intraparietal and principal sulcal cortex , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  F. Ottes,et al.  Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system , 1985, Vision Research.

[22]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Spatial attention-determined modifications in saccade trajectories. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[25]  M. Schlag-Rey,et al.  How the frontal eye field can impose a saccade goal on superior colliculus neurons. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  M. Segraves Activity of monkey frontal eye field neurons projecting to oculomotor regions of the pons. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[29]  J. Bullier,et al.  Topography of visual cortex connections with frontal eye field in macaque: convergence and segregation of processing streams , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  D. Pandya,et al.  Projections to the frontal cortex from the posterior parietal region in the rhesus monkey , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  Amishi P. Jha,et al.  Promoting Novelty in Vision: Inhibition of Return Modulates Perceptual-Level Processing , 1999 .

[32]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Ipsilateral inhibition and contralateral facilitation of simple reaction time to non-foveal visual targets from non-informative visual cues. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[33]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  R Klein,et al.  The spatial distribution of attention during covert visual orienting. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[35]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Eye movements evoked by stimulation of frontal eye fields. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  A. Kramer,et al.  Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field , 1995 .

[38]  C. Bruce,et al.  Frontal eye field efferents in the macaque monkey: II. Topography of terminal fields in midbrain and pons , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[39]  J. Pratt,et al.  Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  Christian Coëffé,et al.  Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: Predictability and latency effects , 1987, Vision Research.

[41]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Orienting of Visual Attention , 1992 .

[42]  H J Müller,et al.  Disinhibition of return: Unnecessary and unlikely , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  S. Coren,et al.  Effect of Non-Target Stimuli upon Length of Voluntary Saccades , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[44]  R Klein,et al.  Covert visual orienting: hemifield-activation can be mimicked by zoom lens and midlocation placement strategies. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[45]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Functional properties of corticotectal neurons in the monkey's frontal eye field. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  What is inhibited in inhibition of return? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[49]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of visual attention in progressive supranuclear palsy. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[52]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[53]  W. Wolf,et al.  The Evaluation of the Oculomotor Error Signal , 1984 .

[54]  R Fendrich,et al.  Inhibitory tagging of locations in the blind field of hemianopic patients. , 1997, Consciousness and cognition.

[55]  L A Krubitzer,et al.  Frontal eye field as defined by intracortical microstimulation in squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, and macaque monkeys II. cortical connections , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[56]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  J Jonides,et al.  Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: new perceptual objects or visual masking? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of random dot targets , 1998, Vision Research.

[59]  C. Possamaï,et al.  A responding hand effect in a simple-RT precueing experiment: evidence for a late locus of facilitation. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[60]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Location vs Feature: Reaction Time Reveals Dissociation Between Two Visual Functions , 1996, Vision Research.

[61]  Goldberg Me,et al.  Higher centers concerned with eye movement and visual attention: cerebral cortex and thalamus. , 1988 .

[62]  D. Robinson Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey. , 1972, Vision research.

[63]  Tony Ro,et al.  Inhibition of return in saccadic eye movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[64]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? , 1994, Vision Research.

[65]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .

[67]  W C Schmidt,et al.  Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[68]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Composition and topographic organization of signals sent from the frontal eye field to the superior colliculus. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[69]  G. Leichnetz,et al.  The prefrontal corticotectal projection in the monkey; An anterograde and retrograde horseradish peroxidase study , 1981, Neuroscience.

[70]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[71]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Inhibition of Return in Newborn Infants , 1994 .

[72]  W. Fries Cortical projections to the superior colliculus in the macaque monkey: A retrograde study using horseradish peroxidase , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[73]  D. Henson Corrective saccades: Effects of altering visual feedback , 1978, Vision Research.

[74]  C T Scialfa,et al.  Age differences in saccadic averaging. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[75]  C. Bruce,et al.  Topography of projections to posterior cortical areas from the macaque frontal eye fields , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[76]  J. L. Conway,et al.  Deficits in eye movements following frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[77]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[78]  Christian Coëffé TWO WAYS OF IMPROVING SACCADE ACCURACY , 1987 .

[79]  H Egeth,et al.  Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[80]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Further Evidence for the Division of Attention Among Non-contiguous Locations , 1998 .

[81]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  On the time course of exogenous cueing effects: a commentary on Tassinari et al. (1994) , 1998, Vision research.

[82]  J M Findlay,et al.  Short Report: Scrutinization, Spatial Attention, and the Spatial Programming of Saccadic Eye Movements , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[83]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .

[84]  D P Munoz,et al.  Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[85]  S P Tipper,et al.  Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split-brain. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[86]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  The Development of Inhibition of Return in Early Infancy , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[87]  M. Saslow Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[88]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[89]  H. Deubel,et al.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[90]  D. Sparks,et al.  Population coding of saccadic eye movements by neurons in the superior colliculus , 1988, Nature.