Effects of total cochlear haircell loss on integrity of cochlear nucleus. A quantitative study.

In cochleas of chincillas treated with amikacin, cochlear sensory cells were totally destroyed in all new-born animals. In animals treated as adults some occasional haircells remained in apical turns. In the neonatally treated animals, the resulting auditory deprivation significantly affected the volume of the ventral cochlear nucleus and large-dark spherical cell area. The density of large-dark spherical cells increased significantly from normal in both neonatally and adult treated groups. Our results suggest that the VCN is more dependent on auditory stimulation for proper development than the DCN. In adult chinchillas treated with amikacin there was a significant change in large-dark spherical cell density without a change in total cell numbers or large-dark spherical cell area volume. Our study indicates that the mature cochlear nucleus is much more resistant to the effects of auditory deprivation than the developing cochlear nucleus and that the maintenance of the mature auditory system is not as dependent on auditory stimulation. Studies such as this examining the morphological effects of profound cochlear deafness on higher levels of the auditory system are essential in cochlear implant research.

[1]  H J Gundersen,et al.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction * , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  J. Aran,et al.  Progressive degeneration in the cochlear nucleus after chemical destruction of the cochlea. , 1986, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[3]  C. Sotelo,et al.  Degenerative patterns in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the rat after primary deafferentation. An ultra-structural study. , 1973, Brain research.

[4]  Nell B. Cant,et al.  The bushy cells in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. A study with the electron microscope , 1979, Neuroscience.

[5]  O. Steward,et al.  Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Cessation of amino acid incorporation as an antecedent to age‐dependent transneuronal degeneration , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  R. Harrison,et al.  Morphological changes to the cochlea in an animal model of profound deafness. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[7]  D. Hubel,et al.  Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  H. J. G. Gundersen,et al.  The impact of recent stereological advances on quantitative studies of the nervous system , 1986, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  H. Killackey,et al.  Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus following unilateral cochlear ablation in the neonatal gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  T. Mayhew,et al.  Inter‐animal variation and its influence on the overall precision of morphometric estimates based on nested sampling designs , 1983, Journal of microscopy.

[11]  D. Hubel,et al.  EFFECTS OF VISUAL DEPRIVATION ON MORPHOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF CELLS IN THE CATS LATERAL GENICULATE BODY. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  J. Brawer,et al.  Projections of the cochlea to the dorsal cochlear nucleus in the cat. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[13]  E. Rubel,et al.  Effects of unilateral cochlea removal on anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons in developing gerbils , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  E. Rubel,et al.  Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Effects of conductive and sensorineural hearing loss on N. Magnocellularis , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  T. Parks.  Morphology of axosomatic endings in an avian cochlear nucleus: Nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  R. Gulley,et al.  Non-primary afferents to the principal cells of the rostral anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea pig. , 1978, The American journal of anatomy.

[17]  E. Rubel,et al.  Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Changes in succinate dehydrogenase activity following cochlea removal , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  D. Born,et al.  Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Neuron number and size following cochlea removal , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  D R Moore,et al.  Auditory brainstem of the ferret: Effects of unilateral cochlear lesions on cochlear nucleus volume and projections to the inferior colliculus , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  R. Østerby,et al.  Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or ‘Do more less well!‘ , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[21]  N. Cant,et al.  Axons from non-cochlear sources in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. A study with the rapid golgi method , 1978, Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Harrison,et al.  Cytoarchitecture of cochlear nucleus in the chinchilla. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[23]  T P POWELL,et al.  Transneuronal cell degeneration in the auditory relay nuclei of the cat. , 1962, Journal of anatomy.

[24]  E C Kane,et al.  Patterns of degeneration in the caudal cochlear nucleus of the cat after cochlear ablation , 1974, The Anatomical record.

[25]  D. Moore.  Auditory brainstem of the ferret: Sources of projections to the inferior colliculus , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[26]  K. Osen.  Course and termination of the primary afferents in the cochlear nuclei of the cat. An experimental anatomical study. , 1970, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[27]  D. Trune,et al.  Influence of neonatal cochlear removal on the development of mouse cochlear nucleus: I. Number, size, and density of its neurons , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  N. Kiang,et al.  Spontaneous spike discharges from single units in the cochlear nucleus after destruction of the cochlea. , 1966, Experimental neurology.