Design for Resourceful Ageing : Intervening in the Ethics of Gerontechnology

This paper discusses an innovative approach to the design of technologies for older people. The approach contains a critique of “gerontechnology” as taking decisions out of the hands of older people and materializing what it means to live healthily and well into “foolproof” designs that easily become inappropriate in the variety of situations in which older people end up using them. The proposed design approach focuses on re-delegating such ethical decisions to the point at which technology is used. It does so by considering technologies as resources that can complement the ageing competences of older people and adapt in a variety of ways. To gain design knowledge of the way existing technologies as well as prototypes function as resources across webs of practices, and the dimensions of ‘openness’ along which they may adapt within such practices, the approach enlists networks of everyday things as co-ethnographers.

[1]  Peter Laslett,et al.  A Fresh Map of Life: The Emergence of the Third Age , 1991 .

[2]  P. Verbeek,et al.  Materializing Morality , 2006 .

[3]  Daan van Eijk,et al.  Practices as a unit of design , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[4]  H. Kendig,et al.  Directions for ageing well in a healthy Australia , 2011 .

[5]  Alexander Peine,et al.  The rise of the “innosumer”—Rethinking older technology users , 2014 .

[6]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[7]  Jared Donovan,et al.  Moving from objects to possibilities , 2012 .

[8]  Imre Horváth,et al.  Differences between 'research in design context' and 'design inclusive research' in the domain of industrial design engineering , 2008 .

[9]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Meta-design: A Framework for the Future of End-User Development , 2006, End User Development.

[10]  Mili Docampo.  Technology generation and Age in using layered user interfaces , 2002 .

[11]  Alexander Peine,et al.  Social-structural lag revisited , 2011 .

[12]  Jared Donovan,et al.  Design anthropology: An introduction , 2012 .

[13]  Chris Speed,et al.  Thing Ethnography: Doing Design Research with Non-Humans , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[14]  P. Harvey,et al.  Ageing well, ageing productively: The essential contribution of Australia’s ageing population to the social and economic prosperity of the nation , 2009 .

[15]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Dispelling ageing myths in technology design , 2013, OZCHI.

[16]  Louis Neven,et al.  By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people's wish to live at home , 2015 .

[17]  Tim Cooper,et al.  What is broken? Expected lifetime, perception of brokenness and attitude towards maintenance and repair , 2015 .

[18]  van Jemh Annelies Bronswijk,et al.  Gerontechnology as a field of endeavour , 2009 .

[19]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Creativity and evolution: a metadesign perspective , 2008, Digit. Creativity.

[20]  Conny Bakker,et al.  Designing change by living change , 2012 .

[21]  Chris Speed,et al.  Listening to an everyday kettle: How can the data objects collect be useful for design research? , 2015 .

[22]  Louis Neven,et al.  'But obviously not for me': robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. , 2010, Sociology of health & illness.

[23]  Elisa Giaccardi.  Metadesign as an Emergent Design Culture , 2005, Leonardo.

[24]  Jorgen P. Bansler,et al.  GUEST EDITORIAL Special Issue: Drought in South African savannas , 2020 .

[25]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Habituated objects: everyday tangibles that foster the independent living of an elderly woman , 2013, INTR.

[26]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Manifestations of everyday design: guiding goals and motivations , 2013, Creativity & Cognition.

[27]  Andreas Reckwitz.  Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[28]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[29]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[30]  T. Ingold.  Toward an Ecology of Materials , 2012 .

[31]  Paul Thompson,et al.  ‘I Don't Feel Old’: Subjective Ageing and the Search for Meaning in Later Life , 1992, Ageing and Society.

[32]  Daniel Lopez Gomez.  Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life , 2015 .

[33]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[34]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[35]  Philip D. Gray,et al.  An integrated approach to supporting interaction evolution in home care systems , 2008, PETRA '08.

[36]  Jeannette Pols,et al.  Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life , 2015 .

[37]  S. Hyysalo.  Representations of Use and Practice-Bound Imaginaries in Automating the Safety of the Elderly , 2006 .

[38]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Aspects of Everyday Design: Resourcefulness, Adaptation, and Emergence , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[39]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .