TCRM_A_278454 1289..1296
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Moul,et al. Interrupted versus Continuous Suturing for Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2019, European urology focus.
[2] A. Kretschmer,et al. [Stricture of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy]. , 2018, Der Urologe (Ausg. A).
[3] F. Nickel,et al. Interrupted versus continuous suturing for vesicourethral anastomosis during radical prostatectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, BMJ Open.
[4] K. Brasso,et al. Anastomotic complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy , 2016, Scandinavian journal of urology.
[5] S. Jeon,et al. Effect of Continuous Urethro-Vesical Anastomosis Technique in Incontinence After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy, 1:1 Matching Study , 2015, International neurourology journal.
[6] Ju Hyun Lim,et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between running versus interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience , 2015, Korean journal of urology.
[7] H. Matsuyama,et al. Running suture versus interrupted suture for vesicourethral anastomosis in retropubic radical prostatectomy: A randomized study , 2015, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.
[8] M. Puntoni,et al. Age Is Predictive of Immediate Postoperative Urinary Continence after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy , 2013, Urologia Internationalis.
[9] G. Chatellier,et al. Does the use of a barbed polyglyconate absorbable suture have an impact on urethral anastomosis time, urethral stenosis rates, and cost effectiveness during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? , 2013, Urology.
[10] H. G. van der Poel,et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.
[11] J. J. Juan Escudero,et al. Use of a barbed suture for the urethro-vesical anastomosis during the learning curve of the endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. , 2012, Archivos españoles de urología.
[12] A. Haese*,et al. Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. , 2011, European urology.
[13] R. Herwig,et al. Urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: the patient perspective. , 2011, The Canadian journal of urology.
[14] N. Simforoosh,et al. Early continence after open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with sutureless vesicourethral alignment: an alternative technique, 8 years' experience. , 2009, Urology journal.
[15] A. Shalhav,et al. Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. , 2009, The Canadian journal of urology.
[16] I. Varkarakis,et al. Reducing the number of sutures for vesicourethral anastomosis in radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2009, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.
[17] D. Teber,et al. Analysis of three different vesicourethral anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2008, World Journal of Urology.
[18] R. Autorino,et al. Vesicourethral anastomosis during radical retropubic prostatectomy: does the number of sutures matter? , 2007, Urology.
[19] Jin‐Young Jang,et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison between the two pancreaticojejunostomy methods for approximating the pancreatic parenchyma to the jejunal seromuscular layer: interrupted vs continuous stitches. , 2006, World journal of gastroenterology.
[20] I. Tuerk,et al. Progression of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: improved outcomes with the extraperitoneal approach and a running anastomosis. , 2006, Journal of endourology.
[21] A. Morabito,et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2006, The Journal of urology.
[22] W. Dillenburg,et al. Vesicourethral anastomosis during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison between the single-knot running and interrupted technique. , 2006, Urology.
[23] J. Thüroff,et al. Technical advances in radical retropubic prostatectomy techniques for avoiding complications. Part II: vesico‐urethral anastomosis and nerve‐sparing prostatectomy , 2003, BJU international.
[24] Ralph V Clayman,et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method. , 2003, Urology.
[25] M. Litwin,et al. Urinary function and bother after radical prostatectomy or radiation for prostate cancer: a longitudinal, multivariate quality of life analysis from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor. , 2000, The Journal of urology.
[26] P. Walsh. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. , 1998, The Journal of urology.
[27] T. Kneib,et al. Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence. , 1998, Urology.
[28] R. Ferrigni,et al. Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1997, Urology.
[29] M. Steiner. The puboprostatic ligament and the male urethral suspensory mechanism: an anatomic study. , 1994, Urology.
[30] J. Goellner,et al. Prostate shape, external striated urethral sphincter and radical prostatectomy: the apical dissection. , 1987, The Journal of urology.
[31] P. Walsh,et al. An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini's plexus during radical retropubic surgery. , 1979, The Journal of urology.