Ecological assessment criteria for restoring anadromous salmonid habitat in Pacific Northwest estuaries

Restoration of estuarine habitats is essential for the conservation and recovery of depressed Pacific salmon populations. However, assessing the functions of recently restored habitat poses a number of problems because of the transitory occurrence of salmonids in any one location. We propose assessment criteria and metrics that are based on the habitat’s capacity, opportunity, and realized function to enhance survivability of juvenile salmon. Because of the paucity of data relating capacity and opportunity attributes to realized function (e.g. growth, consumption rate, survival), there continues to be a need for manipulative experiments to assess the developmental status of restoration sites. Such a self-monitoring approach of letting the fish diagnose the ecological state of restoration would effectively address the small-scale, site-specific assessment goals and criteria, but ignores the larger-scale issues relating to the ability of diverse salmon species and life histories to occupy estuarine habitat landscapes. If coastal restoration is going to contribute the recovery of anadromous salmonid populations, a landscape perspective is fundamental to restoration planning, implementation, and particularly assessment. © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  S. Bell,et al.  Linking Restoration and Landscape Ecology , 1997 .

[2]  Ernest O. Salo,et al.  THE ROLE OF PUGET SOUND AND WASHINGTON COASTAL ESTUARIES IN THE LIFE HISTORY OF PACIFIC SALMON: AN UNAPPRECIATED FUNCTION , 1982 .

[3]  S. Bell,et al.  Seagrass landscapes: a terrestrial approach to the marine subtidal environment. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  Jessica A. Miller,et al.  A comparative assessment of a natural and created estuarine slough as rearing habitat for juvenile chinook and coho salmon , 1997 .

[5]  William J. Mitsch,et al.  Improving the Success of Wetland Creation and Restoration with Know‐How, Time, and Self‐Design , 1996 .

[6]  William K. Michener,et al.  Quantitatively Evaluating Restoration Experiments: Research Design, Statistical Analysis, and Data Management Considerations , 1997 .

[7]  R. Kneib Early life stages of resident nekton in intertidal marshes , 1997 .

[8]  E. Irlandi,et al.  Landscape ecology and the marine environment : how spatial configuration of seagrass habitat influences growth and survival of the bay scallop , 1995 .

[9]  J. Zedler,et al.  Limited response of cordgrass (Spartina foliosa) to soil amendments in a constructed marsh , 1994 .

[10]  Loveday L. Conquest,et al.  Estuarine Habitat Assessment Protocol , 1989 .

[11]  C. Simenstad,et al.  Temporary Residence by Juvenile Salmon in a Restored Estuarine Wetland , 1990 .

[12]  R. Kneib The role of tidal marshes in the ecology of estuarine nekton , 1997 .

[13]  Jeffery R. Cordell,et al.  Duwamish River coastal America restoration and reference sites: Results and recommendations from Year One Pilot and Monitoring Studies , 1994 .

[14]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  Utilization of natural and transplanted Texas salt marshes by fish and decapod crustaceans , 1992 .

[15]  E. Wolf,et al.  The rain forests of home : profile of a North American bioregion , 1998 .

[16]  B. E. Feist,et al.  Ecological status of a created estuarine slough in the Chehalis river estuary: assessment of created and natural estuarine sloughs, January-December 1995 , 1996 .

[17]  T. Minello,et al.  Estimating densities of small fishes and decapod crustaceans in shallow estuarine habitats: A review of sampling design with focus on gear selection , 1997 .

[18]  Z. Naveh,et al.  From Biodiversity to Ecodiversity: A Landscape‐Ecology Approach to Conservation and Restoration , 1994 .

[19]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Ecological Issues in Wetland Mitigation: An Introduction to the Forum , 1996 .

[20]  Charles A. Simenstad,et al.  Functional Equivalency Trajectories of the Restored Gog‐Le‐Hi‐Te Estuarine Wetland , 1996 .

[21]  Jeffery R Cordell,et al.  Duwamish River coastal America restoration and reference sites: results from 1995 monitoring studies , 1996 .

[22]  C. Simenstad,et al.  Foraging by juvenile salmon in a restored estuarine wetland , 1992 .

[23]  M. Healey JUVENILE PACIFIC SALMON IN ESTUARIES: THE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM , 1982 .

[24]  B. D. Chang,et al.  Differential use of the Campbell River estuary, British Columbia, by wild and hatchery-reared juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) , 1986 .

[25]  Thomas P. Quinn,et al.  Pacific Salmon Life Histories , 1992 .

[26]  V. Thomas Parker,et al.  The Scale of Successional Models and Restoration Objectives , 1997 .

[27]  M. Palmer,et al.  Ecological Theory and Community Restoration Ecology , 1997 .

[28]  L. Levin,et al.  AreSpartina marshes a replaceable resource? A functional approach to evaluation of marsh creation efforts , 1991 .

[29]  L. Margolis,et al.  Pacific Salmon Life Histories , 1992 .

[30]  Jeffery R. Cordell,et al.  Biological status of fish and invertebrate assemblages in a breached-dike wetland site at Spencer Island, Washington , 1998 .

[31]  Mark M. Brinson,et al.  The Role of Reference Wetlands in Functional Assessment and Mitigation , 1996 .