The precautionary principle as multi-period games where players have different thresholds for acceptable uncertainty

ABSTRACT The precautionary principle (PP) is formalized assuming multiple players (branches of government, interest groups, etc.). Each player has a different threshold for acceptable uncertainty. A flow chart illustrates how a threat impacts uncertainty. Thereafter each player, starting with the most precautionary, assesses whether the uncertainty is below its threshold. Replying yes implies no command and execution of action, and vice versa when replying no. One game is played in each time period through the flow chart, followed by a feedback loop causing a new and possibly lower threat and uncertainty. The process continues as long as at least one player experiences uncertainty above its threshold. The flow chart is illustrated with a 2  ×  2 game displaying equilibria through three time periods where both players, one player, and no players are precautionary. Illustrations are made involving pollution, climate change, genetically modified food, new drugs, and nuclear proliferation. A nuclear power example with three players illustrates equilibria with varying degrees of being precautionary.

[1]  P. Sandin Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle , 1999, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[2]  Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[3]  Kjell Hausken,et al.  Formalizing the Precautionary Principle Accounting for Strategic Interaction, Natural Factors, and Technological Factors , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Nathan S C Fahey,et al.  Is there a need to re-examine the approval of bismuth shotshell as a non-toxic alternative to lead based on the precautionary principle? , 2006, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[5]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk informed decision-making and its ethical basis , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Sandrine Blanchemanche,et al.  Enlisting Supervised Machine Learning in Mapping Scientific Uncertainty Expressed in Food Risk Analysis , 2019 .

[7]  Karim Bschir,et al.  Risk, Uncertainty and Precaution in Science: The Threshold of the Toxicological Concern Approach in Food Toxicology , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[8]  Jonathan Aldred,et al.  Justifying precautionary policies: Incommensurability and uncertainty , 2013 .

[9]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[10]  Eric van Damme,et al.  Non-Cooperative Games , 2000 .

[11]  Takao Asano,et al.  Precautionary Principle and the Optimal Timing of Environmental Policy Under Ambiguity , 2010 .

[12]  A G Renwick,et al.  Evaluation of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC)--challenges and approaches. , 2013, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  Jason Michael Woodruff,et al.  Consequence and likelihood in risk estimation: A matter of balance in UK health and safety risk assessment practice , 2005 .

[14]  J. Cameron,et al.  Interpreting the Precautionary Principle , 2013 .

[15]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Species preservation versus development: An experimental investigation under uncertainty , 2011 .

[16]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[17]  E. Persson What are the core ideas behind the Precautionary Principle? , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Endangered Species and Uncertainty: The Economics of a Safe Minimum Standard , 1978 .

[19]  Peter Wright,et al.  Assessment of London underground tube tunnels - investigation, monitoring and analysis , 2010 .

[20]  Paul Baybutt The ALARP principle in process safety , 2014 .

[21]  O E Goss,et al.  Management of particles detected on the Dounreay site. , 2007, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[22]  Ji-Eun Lee,et al.  Determining the Applicability of Threshold of Toxicological Concern Approaches to Substances Found in Foods , 2013, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[23]  Kjell Hausken,et al.  Principal-Agent Theory, Game Theory, and the Precautionary Principle , 2019, Decis. Anal..

[24]  M. Starkl,et al.  Design of an institutional decision-making process: the case of urban water management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[26]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Endangered Species and the Safe Minimum Standard , 1991 .

[28]  T. Crowards,et al.  Safe Minimum Standards: costs and opportunities , 1998 .

[29]  Dennis J. Palmini Uncertainty, risk aversion, and the game theoretic foundations of the safe minimum standard: a reassessment , 1999 .

[30]  Denys Yemshanov,et al.  Evaluating Critical Uncertainty Thresholds in a Spatial Model of Forest Pest Invasion Risk , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  Barbara Osimani,et al.  The precautionary principle in the pharmaceutical domain: a philosophical enquiry into probabilistic reasoning and risk aversion , 2013 .

[32]  Sven Ove Hansson The Limits of Precaution , 1997 .

[33]  Ben J. M. Ale,et al.  ALARP and CBA all in the same game , 2015 .

[34]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Five charges against the precautionary principle , 2002 .

[35]  Anastasios Xepapadeas,et al.  Pollution Control with Uncertain Stock Dynamics: When, and How, to be Precautious , 2012 .

[36]  Rod Troutbeck,et al.  Zero roadworker harm: Ethical and legal challenges , 2017 .

[37]  Jonathan Aldred,et al.  Climate change uncertainty, irreversibility and the precautionary principle , 2012 .

[38]  Maria Francesca Milazzo,et al.  Using the ALARP principle for safety management in the energy production sector of chemical industry , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[39]  Tracy Taylor,et al.  Mega Events, Fear, and Risk: Terrorism at the Olympic Games , 2008 .

[40]  Terje Aven,et al.  On Different Types of Uncertainties in the Context of the Precautionary Principle , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[41]  Kjell Hausken,et al.  A cost–benefit analysis of terrorist attacks , 2018 .