Enabling the Internet of Arctic Things With Freely-Drifting Small-Satellite Swarms

The widespread deployment of Internet-capable devices, also known as the Internet of Things (IoT), reaches even the most remote areas of the planet, including the Arctic. However, and despite the vast scientific and economic interest in this area, communication infrastructures are scarce. Nowadays, existing options rely on solutions such as Iridium, which can be limited and too costly. This paper proposes and evaluates an alternative to existing solutions, using small satellites deployed as a freely-drifting swarm. By combining these simpler and more affordable satellites with standard protocols, we show how IoT can be supported in the Arctic. Networking protocols and link characteristics are emulated for 3 different satellite orbits and 4 ground nodes. The impact of different protocols and communication conditions is assessed over a period of 49 days and a cross-layer routing approach proposed. The obtained results reveal that a communication overhead bellow 27 % can be achieved and that the implemented satellite-aware route selection allows reducing the end-to-end time of a request up to 93 min on average. This confirms that freely-drifting small-satellite swarms may enable the Internet of Things even in the most remote areas.

[1]  Joel Mueting,et al.  Propulsion trade studies for spacecraft swarm mission design , 2018, 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[2]  Vinton G. Cerf,et al.  Delay-Tolerant Networking Architecture , 2007, RFC.

[3]  Lambros Lambrinos,et al.  Applying delay tolerant networking routing algorithms in maritime communications , 2013, 2013 IEEE 14th International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM).

[4]  Carsten Bormann,et al.  The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) , 2014, RFC.

[5]  Roger Birkeland Freely drifting cubesat constellations for improving coverage for Arctic sensor networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[6]  Stephen E. Deering,et al.  Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification , 1995, RFC.

[7]  David Palma,et al.  Freely Drifting Small-Satellite Swarms for Sensor Networks in the Arctic , 2018, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.

[8]  Katharine Smith,et al.  Launch and deployment of distributed small satellite systems , 2015 .

[9]  Yves Mahéo,et al.  CoAP over BP for a Delay-Tolerant Internet of Things , 2015, 2015 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud.

[10]  Igor Bisio,et al.  Satellite Communications Supporting Internet of Remote Things , 2016, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[12]  David Palma,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles as Data Mules: An Experimental Assessment , 2017, IEEE Access.

[13]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  Survey on Communication and Networks for Autonomous Marine Systems , 2019, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[14]  Enzo Mingozzi,et al.  CoAPthon: Easy development of CoAP-based IoT applications with Python , 2015, 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[15]  Kanna Rajan,et al.  On small satellites for oceanography: A survey , 2015, 1512.07442.

[16]  Lloyd Wood,et al.  Sharing the dream , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications & Workshops.

[17]  David E. Culler,et al.  Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks , 2007, RFC.

[18]  Guo-Ping Liu,et al.  A Survey on Formation Control of Small Satellites , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Samita Chakrabarti,et al.  IPv6 over Constrained Node Networks(6lo) Applicability & Use cases , 2019 .

[20]  Martin N. Sweeting,et al.  Modern Small Satellites-Changing the Economics of Space , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.